Lewis Sharon R, Pritchard Michael W, Thomas Carmel M, Smith Andrew F
Lancaster Patient Safety Research Unit, Royal Lancaster Infirmary, Pointer Court 1, Ashton Road, Lancaster, UK, LA1 4RP.
Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2019 Jul 23;7(7):CD004477. doi: 10.1002/14651858.CD004477.pub3.
Acute respiratory distress syndrome (ARDS) is a life-threatening condition caused by direct or indirect injury to the lungs. Despite improvements in clinical management (for example, lung protection strategies), mortality in this patient group is at approximately 40%. This is an update of a previous version of this review, last published in 2004.
To evaluate the effectiveness of pharmacological agents in adults with ARDS on mortality, mechanical ventilation, and fitness to return to work at 12 months.
We searched CENTRAL, MEDLINE, Embase, and CINAHL on 10 December 2018. We searched clinical trials registers and grey literature, and handsearched reference lists of included studies and related reviews.
We included randomized controlled trials (RCTs) comparing pharmacological agents with control (placebo or standard therapy) to treat adults with established ARDS. We excluded trials of nitric oxide, inhaled prostacyclins, partial liquid ventilation, neuromuscular blocking agents, fluid and nutritional interventions and medical oxygen. We excluded studies published earlier than 2000, because of changes to lung protection strategies for people with ARDS since this date.
Two review authors independently assessed studies for inclusion, extracted data, and assessed risks of bias. We assessed the certainty of evidence with GRADE.
We included 48 RCTs with 6299 participants who had ARDS; two included only participants with mild ARDS (also called acute lung injury). Most studies included causes of ARDS that were both direct and indirect injuries. We noted differences between studies, for example the time of administration or the size of dose, and because of unclear reporting we were uncertain whether all studies had used equivalent lung protection strategies.We included five types of agents as the primary comparisons in the review: corticosteroids, surfactants, N-acetylcysteine, statins, and beta-agonists. We included 15 additional agents (sivelestat, mesenchymal stem cells, ulinastatin, anisodimine, angiotensin-converting enzyme (ACE) inhibitor, recombinant human ACE2 (palifermin), AP301, granulocyte-macrophage colony stimulating factor (GM-CSF), levosimendan, prostacyclins, lisofylline, ketaconazole, nitroglycerins, L-2-oxothiazolidine-4-carboxylic acid (OTZ), and penehyclidine hydrochloride).We used GRADE to downgrade outcomes for imprecision (because of few studies and few participants), for study limitations (e.g. high risks of bias) and for inconsistency (e.g. differences between study data).Corticosteroids versus placebo or standard therapyCorticosteroids may reduce all-cause mortality within three months by 86 per 1000 patients (with as many as 161 fewer to 19 more deaths); however, the 95% confidence interval (CI) includes the possibility of both increased and reduced deaths (risk ratio (RR) 0.77, 95% CI 0.57 to 1.05; 6 studies, 574 participants; low-certainty evidence). Due to the very low-certainty evidence, we are uncertain whether corticosteroids make little or no difference to late all-cause mortality (later than three months) (RR 0.99, 95% CI 0.64 to 1.52; 1 study, 180 participants), or to the duration of mechanical ventilation (mean difference (MD) -4.30, 95% CI -9.72 to 1.12; 3 studies, 277 participants). We found that ventilator-free days up to day 28 (VFD) may be improved with corticosteroids (MD 4.09, 95% CI 1.74 to 6.44; 4 studies, 494 participants; low-certainty evidence). No studies reported adverse events leading to discontinuation of study medication, or fitness to return to work at 12 months (FTR).Surfactants versus placebo or standard therapyWe are uncertain whether surfactants make little or no difference to early mortality (RR 1.08, 95% CI 0.91 to 1.29; 9 studies, 1338 participants), or whether they reduce late all-cause mortality (RR 1.28, 95% CI 1.01 to 1.61; 1 study, 418 participants). Similarly, we are uncertain whether surfactants reduce the duration of mechanical ventilation (MD -2.50, 95% CI -4.95 to -0.05; 1 study, 16 participants), make little or no difference to VFD (MD -0.39, 95% CI -2.49 to 1.72; 2 studies, 344 participants), or to adverse events leading to discontinuation of study medication (RR 0.50, 95% CI 0.17 to 1.44; 2 studies, 88 participants). We are uncertain of these effects because we assessed them as very low-certainty. No studies reported FTR.N-aceytylcysteine versus placeboWe are uncertain whether N-acetylcysteine makes little or no difference to early mortality, because we assessed this as very low-certainty evidence (RR 0.64, 95% CI 0.32 to 1.30; 1 study, 36 participants). No studies reported late all-cause mortality, duration of mechanical ventilation, VFD, adverse events leading to study drug discontinuation, or FTR.Statins versus placeboStatins probably make little or no difference to early mortality (RR 0.99, 95% CI 0.78 to 1.26; 3 studies, 1344 participants; moderate-certainty evidence) or to VFD (MD 0.40, 95% CI -0.71 to 1.52; 3 studies, 1342 participants; moderate-certainty evidence). Statins may make little or no difference to duration of mechanical ventilation (MD 2.70, 95% CI -3.55 to 8.95; 1 study, 60 participants; low-certainty evidence). We could not include data for adverse events leading to study drug discontinuation in one study because it was unclearly reported. No studies reported late all-cause mortality or FTR.Beta-agonists versus placebo controlBeta-blockers probably slightly increase early mortality by 40 per 1000 patients (with as many as 119 more or 25 fewer deaths); however, the 95% CI includes the possibility of an increase as well as a reduction in mortality (RR 1.14, 95% CI 0.91 to 1.42; 3 studies, 646 participants; moderate-certainty evidence). Due to the very low-certainty evidence, we are uncertain whether beta-agonists increase VFD (MD -2.20, 95% CI -3.68 to -0.71; 3 studies, 646 participants), or make little or no difference to adverse events leading to study drug discontinuation (one study reported little or no difference between groups, and one study reported more events in the beta-agonist group). No studies reported late all-cause mortality, duration of mechanical ventilation, or FTR.
AUTHORS' CONCLUSIONS: We found insufficient evidence to determine with certainty whether corticosteroids, surfactants, N-acetylcysteine, statins, or beta-agonists were effective at reducing mortality in people with ARDS, or duration of mechanical ventilation, or increasing ventilator-free days. Three studies awaiting classification may alter the conclusions of this review. As the potential long-term consequences of ARDS are important to survivors, future research should incorporate a longer follow-up to measure the impacts on quality of life.
急性呼吸窘迫综合征(ARDS)是一种由肺部直接或间接损伤导致的危及生命的病症。尽管临床管理有所改善(例如肺保护策略),但该患者群体的死亡率仍约为40%。这是本综述先前版本的更新,上次发表于2004年。
评估药物治疗对成人ARDS患者死亡率、机械通气以及12个月时恢复工作能力的有效性。
我们于2018年12月10日检索了Cochrane系统评价数据库、MEDLINE、Embase和护理学与健康领域数据库。我们检索了临床试验注册库和灰色文献,并手工检索了纳入研究及相关综述的参考文献列表。
我们纳入了比较药物治疗与对照(安慰剂或标准治疗)以治疗确诊ARDS成人患者的随机对照试验(RCT)。我们排除了一氧化氮、吸入性前列环素、部分液体通气、神经肌肉阻滞剂、液体和营养干预以及医用氧气的试验。我们排除了2000年以前发表的研究,因为自那时起ARDS患者的肺保护策略发生了变化。
两位综述作者独立评估研究是否纳入、提取数据并评估偏倚风险。我们使用GRADE评估证据的确定性。
我们纳入了48项RCT,共6299名ARDS患者;两项研究仅纳入了轻度ARDS(也称为急性肺损伤)患者。大多数研究纳入的ARDS病因既有直接损伤也有间接损伤。我们注意到研究之间存在差异,例如给药时间或剂量大小,并且由于报告不明确,我们不确定所有研究是否都采用了等效的肺保护策略。我们在综述中纳入了五种药物作为主要比较对象:皮质类固醇、表面活性剂、N-乙酰半胱氨酸、他汀类药物和β-受体激动剂。我们还纳入了另外15种药物(西维来司他、间充质干细胞、乌司他丁、山莨菪碱、血管紧张素转换酶(ACE)抑制剂、重组人ACE2(帕利夫明)、AP301、粒细胞-巨噬细胞集落刺激因子(GM-CSF)、左西孟旦、前列环素、利索茶碱、酮康唑、硝酸甘油、L-2-氧代噻唑烷-4-羧酸(OTZ)和盐酸戊乙奎醚)。我们使用GRADE因不精确性(研究和参与者较少)、研究局限性(例如高偏倚风险)和不一致性(例如研究数据之间的差异)而对结果进行了降级。
皮质类固醇与安慰剂或标准治疗
皮质类固醇可能使每1000名患者在三个月内的全因死亡率降低86例(死亡人数减少多达161例至增加19例);然而,95%置信区间(CI)包括死亡人数增加和减少的可能性(风险比(RR)0.77,95%CI 0.57至1.05;6项研究,574名参与者;低确定性证据)。由于证据确定性非常低,我们不确定皮质类固醇对晚期全因死亡率(三个月后)几乎没有影响还是没有影响(RR 0.99,95%CI 0.64至1.52;1项研究,180名参与者),或者对机械通气时间(平均差(MD)-4.30,95%CI -9.72至1.12;3项研究,277名参与者)。我们发现使用皮质类固醇可能会改善至第28天的无呼吸机天数(VFD)(MD 4.09,95%CI 1.74至6.44;4项研究,494名参与者;低确定性证据)。没有研究报告导致停止研究药物的不良事件,或12个月时恢复工作能力(FTR)。
表面活性剂与安慰剂或标准治疗
我们不确定表面活性剂对早期死亡率几乎没有影响还是没有影响(RR 1.08,95%CI 0.91至1.29;9项研究,1338名参与者),或者它们是否会降低晚期全因死亡率(RR 1.28,95%CI 1.01至1.61;1项研究,418名参与者)。同样,我们不确定表面活性剂是否会缩短机械通气时间(MD -2.50,95%CI -4.95至-0.05;1项研究,16名参与者),对VFD几乎没有影响还是没有影响(MD -0.39,95%CI -2.49至1.72;2项研究,344名参与者),或者对导致停止研究药物的不良事件(RR 0.50,95%CI 0.17至1.44;2项研究,88名参与者)。我们不确定这些影响,因为我们将它们评估为非常低确定性。没有研究报告FTR。
N-乙酰半胱氨酸与安慰剂
我们不确定N-乙酰半胱氨酸对早期死亡率几乎没有影响还是没有影响,因为我们将此评估为非常低确定性证据(RR 0.64,95%CI 0.32至1.30;1项研究,36名参与者)。没有研究报告晚期全因死亡率、机械通气时间