Suppr超能文献

同种异体间充质基质细胞治疗中重度急性呼吸窘迫综合征(START 研究):一项随机 2a 期安全性试验。

Treatment with allogeneic mesenchymal stromal cells for moderate to severe acute respiratory distress syndrome (START study): a randomised phase 2a safety trial.

机构信息

Department of Medicine and Anesthesia, University of California, San Francisco, CA, USA; Cardiovascular Research Institute, University of California, San Francisco, CA, USA.

Department of Medicine and Anesthesia, University of California, San Francisco, CA, USA; Cardiovascular Research Institute, University of California, San Francisco, CA, USA.

出版信息

Lancet Respir Med. 2019 Feb;7(2):154-162. doi: 10.1016/S2213-2600(18)30418-1. Epub 2018 Nov 16.

Abstract

BACKGROUND

Treatment with bone-marrow-derived mesenchymal stromal cells (MSCs) has shown benefits in preclinical models of acute respiratory distress syndrome (ARDS). Safety has not been established for administration of MSCs in critically ill patients with ARDS. We did a phase 2a trial to assess safety after administration of MSCs to patients with moderate to severe ARDS.

METHODS

We did a prospective, double-blind, multicentre, randomised trial to assess treatment with one intravenous dose of MSCs compared with placebo. We recruited ventilated patients with moderate to severe ARDS (ratio of partial pressure of oxygen to fractional inspired oxygen <27 kPa and positive end-expiratory pressure [PEEP] ≥8 cm HO) in five university medical centres in the USA. Patients were randomly assigned 2:1 to receive either 10 × 10/kg predicted bodyweight MSCs or placebo, according to a computer-generated schedule with a variable block design and stratified by site. We excluded patients younger than 18 years, those with trauma or moderate to severe liver disease, and those who had received cancer treatment in the previous 2 years. The primary endpoint was safety and all analyses were done by intention to treat. We also measured biomarkers in plasma. MSC viability was tested in a post-hoc analysis. This trial is registered with ClinicalTrials.gov, number NCT02097641.

FINDINGS

From March 24, 2014, to Feb 9, 2017 we screened 1038 patients, of whom 60 were eligible for and received treatment. No patient experienced any of the predefined MSC-related haemodynamic or respiratory adverse events. One patient in the MSC group died within 24 h of MSC infusion, but death was judged to be probably unrelated. 28-day mortality did not differ between the groups (30% in the MSC group vs 15% in the placebo group, odds ratio 2·4, 95% CI 0·5-15·1). At baseline, the MSC group had numerically higher mean scores than the placebo group for Acute Physiology and Chronic Health Evaluation III (APACHE III; 104 [SD 31] vs 89 [33]), minute ventilation (11·1 [3·2] vs 9·6 [2·4] L/min), and PEEP (12·4 [3·7] vs 10·8 [2·6] cm HO). After adjustment for APACHE III score, the hazard ratio for mortality at 28 days was 1·43 (95% CI 0·40-5·12, p=0·58). Viability of MSCs ranged from 36% to 85%.

INTERPRETATION

One dose of intravenous MSCs was safe in patients with moderate to severe ARDS. Larger trials are needed to assess efficacy, and the viability of MSCs must be improved.

FUNDING

National Heart, Lung, and Blood Institute.

摘要

背景

骨髓间充质基质细胞(MSCs)的治疗在急性呼吸窘迫综合征(ARDS)的临床前模型中显示出益处。在患有 ARDS 的危重病患者中给予 MSCs 的安全性尚未确定。我们进行了一项 2a 期试验,以评估给予中度至重度 ARDS 患者 MSCs 后的安全性。

方法

我们进行了一项前瞻性、双盲、多中心、随机试验,以评估与安慰剂相比,单次静脉注射 MSCs 的治疗效果。我们在美国的五所大学医疗中心招募了患有中度至重度 ARDS(氧分压与吸入氧分数之比<27 kPa 和呼气末正压[PEEP]≥8 cm H2O)的需要通气的患者。根据计算机生成的具有可变分组设计的方案,并按地点分层,患者被随机分配 2:1 接受 10×10/kg 预测体重的 MSCs 或安慰剂。我们排除了年龄<18 岁、有创伤或中度至重度肝病的患者,以及在过去 2 年内接受过癌症治疗的患者。主要终点是安全性,所有分析均按意向治疗进行。我们还测量了血浆中的生物标志物。在事后分析中测试了 MSC 的活力。这项试验在 ClinicalTrials.gov 注册,编号为 NCT02097641。

结果

从 2014 年 3 月 24 日至 2017 年 2 月 9 日,我们筛选了 1038 名患者,其中 60 名符合条件并接受了治疗。没有患者出现任何预先定义的与 MSC 相关的血流动力学或呼吸不良事件。MSC 组中有 1 名患者在 MSC 输注后 24 小时内死亡,但死亡被认为可能与 MSC 无关。两组 28 天死亡率无差异(MSC 组 30%,安慰剂组 15%,比值比 2.4,95%CI 0.5-15.1)。在基线时,MSC 组的急性生理学和慢性健康评估 III(APACHE III)评分、分钟通气量和 PEEP 均高于安慰剂组(104[31] vs 89[33]、11.1[3.2] vs 9.6[2.4]L/min 和 12.4[3.7] vs 10.8[2.6]cm H2O)。调整 APACHE III 评分后,28 天死亡率的危险比为 1.43(95%CI 0.40-5.12,p=0.58)。MSC 的活力范围为 36%至 85%。

解释

在患有中度至重度 ARDS 的患者中,单次静脉注射 MSCs 是安全的。需要更大规模的试验来评估疗效,并且必须提高 MSC 的活力。

资助

美国国立心肺血液研究所。

相似文献

引用本文的文献

8
Tissue Engineering and Regenerative Medicine: Perspectives and Challenges.组织工程与再生医学:前景与挑战
MedComm (2020). 2025 Apr 24;6(5):e70192. doi: 10.1002/mco2.70192. eCollection 2025 May.

本文引用的文献

4
Acute Respiratory Distress Syndrome.急性呼吸窘迫综合征
N Engl J Med. 2017 Aug 10;377(6):562-572. doi: 10.1056/NEJMra1608077.
7
Angiopoietins and Tie2 in vascular inflammation.血管生成素与Tie2在血管炎症中的作用
Curr Opin Hematol. 2017 Sep;24(5):432-438. doi: 10.1097/MOH.0000000000000361.

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验