From the Department of Anesthesiology, Intensive Care Medicine, Emergency Medicine and Pain Therapy, Armed Forces Hospital Ulm, Ulm, Germany.
Fachbereich Medizin, ADAC Luftrettung gGmbH, Munich, Germany.
Anesth Analg. 2020 Jan;130(1):176-186. doi: 10.1213/ANE.0000000000004334.
Oligoanalgesia, as well as adverse events related to the initiated pain therapy, is prevalent in out-of-hospital emergency medicine, even when a physician is present. We sought to identify factors involved in insufficient pain therapy of patients presenting with an initial Glasgow Coma Scale (GCS) score of ≥8 in the out-of-hospital phase, when therapy is provided by a physician-staffed helicopter emergency medical service (p-HEMS).
This was a multicenter, secondary data analysis of conscious patients treated in primary p-HEMS missions between January 1, 2005, and December 31, 2017. Patients with a numeric rating scale (NRS) pain score ≥4, GCS score ≥8 on the scene, without cardiopulmonary resuscitation (CPR), and a National Advisory Committee for Aeronautics (NACA) score <VI were included. Multivariable logistic binary regression analyses were used to identify characteristics of oligoanalgesia (NRS ≥4 at handover or pain reduction <3). Linear regression analysis was used to identify changes in pain treatment within the study period.
We analyzed data from 106,730 patients (3.6% missing data at variable level). Of these patients, 82.9% received some type of analgesic therapy on scene; 79.1% of all patients received analgesic drugs, and 38.6% received nonpharmacological interventions, while 37.4% received both types of intervention. Oligoanalgesia was identified in 18.4% (95% confidence interval [CI], 18.1-18.6) of patients. Factors associated with oligoanalgesia were a low NACA score and a low NRS score, as well as central nervous system or gynecological/obstetric complaints. The use of weak opioids (odds ratio [OR] = 1.05; 95% CI, 0.68-1.57) had no clinically relevant association with oligoanalgesia, in contrast to the use of strong or moderate opioids, nonopioid analgesics, or ketamine. We observed changes in the analgesic drugs used over the 12-year study period, particularly in the use of strong opioids (fentanyl or sufentanil), from 30.3% to 42.3% (P value <.001). Of all patients, 17.1% (95% CI, 16.9-17.3) did not receive any type of pain therapy.
In the studied p-HEMS cohort, oligoanalgesia was present in 18.4% of all cases. Special presenting complaints, low NACA scores, and low pain scores were associated with the occurrence of oligoanalgesia. However, 17.1% of patients received no type of pain therapy, which suggests a scope for further improvement in prehospital pain therapy. Pharmacological and nonpharmaceutical pain relief should be initiated whenever indicated.
即使有医生在场,院外急救医学中也普遍存在镇痛不足以及与启动的疼痛治疗相关的不良事件,即使有医生在场。我们试图确定在院外阶段出现初始格拉斯哥昏迷量表(GCS)评分≥8 的患者中,导致疼痛治疗不足的因素,此时由配备医生的直升机紧急医疗服务(p-HEMS)提供治疗。
这是一项对 2005 年 1 月 1 日至 2017 年 12 月 31 日期间在初级 p-HEMS 任务中接受治疗的意识患者进行的多中心、二次数据分析。纳入标准为数字评分量表(NRS)疼痛评分≥4、现场 GCS 评分≥8、无心肺复苏(CPR)和国家航空咨询委员会(NACA)评分<VI 的患者。采用多变量逻辑二元回归分析确定镇痛不足(交接时 NRS≥4 或疼痛缓解<3)的特征。采用线性回归分析确定研究期间疼痛治疗的变化。
我们分析了 106730 名患者的数据(变量水平有 3.6%的数据缺失)。这些患者中,82.9%在现场接受了某种类型的镇痛治疗;所有患者中有 79.1%接受了镇痛药物治疗,38.6%接受了非药物干预,而 37.4%同时接受了这两种干预。18.4%(95%置信区间[CI],18.1-18.6)的患者存在镇痛不足。与镇痛不足相关的因素包括较低的 NACA 评分和 NRS 评分,以及中枢神经系统或妇科/产科投诉。与使用弱阿片类药物(比值比[OR] = 1.05;95%CI,0.68-1.57)相比,使用强阿片类药物或中等阿片类药物、非阿片类镇痛药或氯胺酮与镇痛不足无临床相关关联。我们观察到在 12 年的研究期间使用的镇痛药物发生了变化,特别是强阿片类药物(芬太尼或舒芬太尼)的使用从 30.3%增加到 42.3%(P<.001)。在所有患者中,17.1%(95%CI,16.9-17.3)未接受任何类型的疼痛治疗。
在所研究的 p-HEMS 队列中,所有病例中镇痛不足的发生率为 18.4%。特殊的表现投诉、较低的 NACA 评分和较低的疼痛评分与镇痛不足的发生有关。然而,17.1%的患者未接受任何类型的疼痛治疗,这表明院前疼痛治疗仍有进一步改善的空间。应在有指征时启动药物和非药物止痛治疗。