• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

美国急需法律和政策的改变,以增加阿片类激动剂治疗的可及性。

Legal and policy changes urgently needed to increase access to opioid agonist therapy in the United States.

机构信息

Network for Public Health Law, 3701 Wilshire Blvd. #750, Los Angeles, CA 90010, United States.

ChangeLab Solutions, 2201 Broadway, Suite 502, Oakland, CA 94612, United States.

出版信息

Int J Drug Policy. 2019 Nov;73:42-48. doi: 10.1016/j.drugpo.2019.07.006. Epub 2019 Jul 20.

DOI:10.1016/j.drugpo.2019.07.006
PMID:31336293
Abstract

The United States continues to face a public health crisis of opioid-related harm, the effects of which could be dramatically reduced through increased access to opioid agonist therapy with the medications methadone and buprenorphine. Despite overwhelming evidence of their efficacy, unduly restrictive federal, state, and local regulation significantly impedes access to these life-saving medications. We outline immediate, concrete steps that federal, state, and local governments can take to change law from barrier to facilitator of evidence-based treatment for opioid use disorder. These include removing onerous restrictions on the prescription and dispensing of buprenorphine and methadone for opioid agonist therapy, requiring insurance coverage of these medications, and mandating that they be provided in correctional settings and promoted by drug courts. Finally, we argue that jurisdictions should proactively offer opioid agonist therapy to individuals at high risk of overdose, remove barriers to establishing methadone treatment facilities, and address underlying social determinants and barriers to treatment. These changes have the ability to save thousands of lives annually.

摘要

美国持续面临阿片类药物相关伤害的公共卫生危机,而通过增加美沙酮和丁丙诺啡等阿片类激动剂治疗的可及性,这些影响可以得到显著减轻。尽管有压倒性的证据表明这些药物的疗效,但联邦、州和地方法律规定过度限制,严重阻碍了这些救命药物的可及性。我们概述了联邦、州和地方政府可以采取的立即采取的具体步骤,将法律从阿片类药物使用障碍的基于证据的治疗的障碍转变为促进因素。这些措施包括取消对阿片类激动剂治疗中丁丙诺啡和美沙酮处方和配药的繁琐限制,要求这些药物纳入医疗保险范围,并规定在惩教场所提供这些药物,并由毒品法庭推广。最后,我们认为,各辖区应主动向有过量风险的个人提供阿片类激动剂治疗,消除建立美沙酮治疗设施的障碍,并解决潜在的社会决定因素和治疗障碍。这些变化有能力每年挽救数千条生命。

相似文献

1
Legal and policy changes urgently needed to increase access to opioid agonist therapy in the United States.美国急需法律和政策的改变,以增加阿片类激动剂治疗的可及性。
Int J Drug Policy. 2019 Nov;73:42-48. doi: 10.1016/j.drugpo.2019.07.006. Epub 2019 Jul 20.
2
Comparing Canadian and United States opioid agonist therapy policies.比较加拿大和美国的阿片类激动剂治疗政策。
Int J Drug Policy. 2019 Dec;74:257-265. doi: 10.1016/j.drugpo.2019.01.020. Epub 2019 Feb 11.
3
Methadone Matters: What the United States Can Learn from the Global Effort to Treat Opioid Addiction.美沙酮至关重要:美国可从全球治疗阿片类药物成瘾工作中学到什么。
J Gen Intern Med. 2019 Jun;34(6):1039-1042. doi: 10.1007/s11606-018-4801-3. Epub 2019 Feb 6.
4
Policies related to opioid agonist therapy for opioid use disorders: The evolution of state policies from 2004 to 2013.与阿片类物质使用障碍的阿片类激动剂治疗相关的政策:2004年至2013年各州政策的演变
Subst Abus. 2016;37(1):63-9. doi: 10.1080/08897077.2015.1080208. Epub 2015 Nov 13.
5
Deploying science to change hearts and minds: Responding to the opioid crisis.运用科学改变观念:应对阿片类药物危机。
Prev Med. 2019 Nov;128:105780. doi: 10.1016/j.ypmed.2019.105780. Epub 2019 Jul 15.
6
The disparate treatment of medications and opiate pain medications under the law: permitting the proliferation of opiates and limiting access to treatment.法律对药物和阿片类止痛药的差别对待:允许阿片类药物扩散并限制治疗途径。
Seton Hall Law Rev. 2012;42(2):741-67.
7
Comparing methadone policy and practice in France and the US: Implications for US policy reform.比较法国和美国的美沙酮政策和实践:对美国政策改革的启示。
Int J Drug Policy. 2024 Jul;129:104487. doi: 10.1016/j.drugpo.2024.104487. Epub 2024 Jun 14.
8
Responses among substance abuse treatment providers to the opioid epidemic in the USA: Variations in buprenorphine and methadone treatment by geography, operational, and payment characteristics, 2007-16.美国阿片类药物泛滥背景下药物滥用治疗提供者的反应:2007-2016 年,按地理位置、运营和支付特征划分的丁丙诺啡和美沙酮治疗的差异。
PLoS One. 2020 Mar 3;15(3):e0229787. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0229787. eCollection 2020.
9
Fatal and non-fatal opioid overdose in opioid dependent patients treated with methadone, buprenorphine or implant naltrexone.接受美沙酮、丁丙诺啡或植入式纳曲酮治疗的阿片类药物依赖患者的致命和非致命阿片类药物过量情况。
Int J Drug Policy. 2017 Aug;46:54-60. doi: 10.1016/j.drugpo.2017.05.039. Epub 2017 Jun 10.
10
Underutilization of medications to treat opioid use disorder: What role does stigma play?阿片类药物使用障碍治疗药物的未充分利用:污名化起了什么作用?
Subst Abus. 2019;40(4):459-465. doi: 10.1080/08897077.2019.1640833. Epub 2019 Sep 24.

引用本文的文献

1
Features of drug addiction treatment programs in Atlantic Canada that help (or not) with access and retention: A qualitative study.加拿大大西洋地区药物成瘾治疗项目中有助于(或无助于)治疗可及性和留存率的特征:一项定性研究
PLoS One. 2025 Aug 4;20(8):e0328524. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0328524. eCollection 2025.
2
Growth in Suicide Rates Among Children During the Illicit Opioid Crisis.儿童自杀率在非法阿片类药物危机期间上升。
Demography. 2023 Dec 1;60(6):1843-1875. doi: 10.1215/00703370-11077660.
3
In-Hospital Methadone Enrollment: a Novel Program to Facilitate Linkage from the Hospital to the Opioid Treatment Program for Vulnerable Patients with Opioid Use Disorder.
住院美沙酮入组:一种为阿片类药物使用障碍的脆弱患者从医院到阿片类药物治疗项目进行衔接的新方案。
J Gen Intern Med. 2024 Feb;39(3):385-392. doi: 10.1007/s11606-023-08411-0. Epub 2023 Sep 15.
4
A Call for an Evidence-Based Strategy Against the Overdose Crisis.呼吁制定基于证据的应对药物过量危机的策略。
Can J Psychiatry. 2024 Jan;69(1):5-9. doi: 10.1177/07067437231188202. Epub 2023 Jul 12.
5
Clinics Optimizing MEthadone Take-homes for opioid use disorder (COMET): Protocol for a stepped-wedge randomized trial to facilitate clinic level changes.诊所优化美沙酮出院带药治疗阿片类药物使用障碍(COMET):促进诊所层面改变的阶梯式随机试验方案。
PLoS One. 2023 Jun 9;18(6):e0286859. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0286859. eCollection 2023.
6
A qualitative exploration of barriers and facilitators to drug treatment services among people who inject drugs in west Virginia.西弗吉尼亚州注射吸毒者获得药物治疗服务的障碍和促进因素的定性探索。
Harm Reduct J. 2023 Jun 1;20(1):69. doi: 10.1186/s12954-023-00795-w.
7
Association of Selected State Policies and Requirements for Buprenorphine Treatment With Per Capita Months of Treatment.州政策与丁丙诺啡治疗要求对人均治疗月数的关联。
JAMA Health Forum. 2023 May 5;4(5):e231102. doi: 10.1001/jamahealthforum.2023.1102.
8
Opioid agonist treatment take-home doses ('carries'): Are current guidelines resulting in low treatment coverage among high-risk populations in Canada and the USA?阿片类激动剂治疗带药回家剂量(“carries”):加拿大和美国的现行指南是否导致高危人群的治疗覆盖率较低?
Harm Reduct J. 2022 Aug 10;19(1):89. doi: 10.1186/s12954-022-00671-z.
9
Assessment of State and Federal Health Policies for Opioid Use Disorder Treatment During the COVID-19 Pandemic and Beyond.评估新冠疫情期间及之后的州和联邦阿片类药物使用障碍治疗政策。
JAMA Health Forum. 2021 Nov;2(11):e213833. doi: 10.1001/jamahealthforum.2021.3833. Epub 2021 Nov 19.
10
A bifurcated opioid treatment system and widening insidious disparities.一种二元化的阿片类药物治疗体系与日益扩大的潜在差异。
Addict Behav. 2022 Jul;130:107296. doi: 10.1016/j.addbeh.2022.107296. Epub 2022 Mar 2.