• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

乌拉圭大麻社会俱乐部:从激进主义到药房?

Uruguayan Cannabis Social Clubs: From activism to dispensaries?

机构信息

Institute for Social Drug Research, Ghent University, Belgium.

Department of Social and Political Sciences, Catholic University of Uruguay, Uruguay.

出版信息

Int J Drug Policy. 2019 Nov;73:49-57. doi: 10.1016/j.drugpo.2019.06.022. Epub 2019 Jul 20.

DOI:10.1016/j.drugpo.2019.06.022
PMID:31336294
Abstract

BACKGROUND

In 2013 Uruguay regulated three models for the supply of cannabis for recreational use (Law 19.172), including Cannabis Social Clubs (CSCs). According to the Cannabis Regulation and Control Institute, 110 CSCs are active at the time of writing.

OBJECTIVES

This paper has a twofold goal. Firstly, it aims to take stock of how the CSC model has continued to be implemented in practice, drawing on the first-hand accounts of those involved in its management. Secondly, our analysis seeks to contribute to the understanding of the CSC model by considering the different variants of the model that have emerged in Uruguay.

METHODOLOGY

Our analysis draws on qualitative research conducted in Uruguay between June and October of 2018. We conducted 15 semi-structured and face-to-face interviews with representatives of registered Uruguayan CSCs and with 13 other stakeholders.

RESULTS/CONCLUSIONS: CSCs' role as cannabis suppliers is perceived positively in terms of the type of cannabis produced and the means of distribution. We found that truly social CSCs co-exist with, and may be losing ground to, quasi-dispensary clubs. A number of factors may have contributed to this, including the Uruguayan regulatory framework, institutional context, and disengagement of members and/or CSC managers. This raises potential new challenges as to the contribution of the CSC model from a harm reduction perspective.

摘要

背景

2013 年,乌拉圭规范了三种用于娱乐用大麻供应的模式(第 19.172 号法律),包括大麻社会俱乐部(CSC)。据大麻监管和控制研究所称,在撰写本文时,有 110 个 CSC 活跃。

目的

本文有两个目标。首先,它旨在根据参与管理的人员的第一手资料,评估 CSC 模式在实践中是如何继续实施的。其次,我们的分析旨在通过考虑在乌拉圭出现的 CSC 模型的不同变体,来促进对 CSC 模型的理解。

方法

我们的分析借鉴了 2018 年 6 月至 10 月在乌拉圭进行的定性研究。我们对注册的乌拉圭 CSC 的代表以及 13 名其他利益相关者进行了 15 次半结构化和面对面的访谈。

结果/结论:从生产的大麻类型和分销方式来看,CSC 作为大麻供应商的角色受到了积极的评价。我们发现,真正的社交 CSC 与准药房俱乐部共存,并且可能处于劣势。有几个因素可能促成了这一点,包括乌拉圭的监管框架、制度背景以及成员和/或 CSC 经理的退出。这就从减少伤害的角度对 CSC 模式的贡献提出了新的潜在挑战。

相似文献

1
Uruguayan Cannabis Social Clubs: From activism to dispensaries?乌拉圭大麻社会俱乐部:从激进主义到药房?
Int J Drug Policy. 2019 Nov;73:49-57. doi: 10.1016/j.drugpo.2019.06.022. Epub 2019 Jul 20.
2
Regulating Cannabis Social Clubs: A comparative analysis of legal and self-regulatory practices in Spain, Belgium and Uruguay.规范大麻社交俱乐部:西班牙、比利时和乌拉圭的法律和自律实践比较分析。
Int J Drug Policy. 2017 May;43:44-56. doi: 10.1016/j.drugpo.2016.12.020. Epub 2017 Feb 10.
3
Cannabis clubs in Uruguay: The challenges of regulation.乌拉圭的大麻俱乐部:监管面临的挑战。
Int J Drug Policy. 2016 Aug;34:41-8. doi: 10.1016/j.drugpo.2016.05.015. Epub 2016 Jul 15.
4
Cannabis social clubs in Belgium: organizational strengths and weaknesses, and threats to the model.比利时的大麻社交俱乐部:组织的优势和劣势,以及对该模式的威胁。
Int J Drug Policy. 2015 Feb;26(2):122-30. doi: 10.1016/j.drugpo.2014.07.016. Epub 2014 Aug 1.
5
An analysis of Belgian Cannabis Social Clubs' supply practices: A shapeshifting model?比利时大麻社会俱乐部供应实践分析:一种不断变化的模式?
Int J Drug Policy. 2018 Jul;57:32-41. doi: 10.1016/j.drugpo.2018.03.027. Epub 2018 Apr 13.
6
Qualitative research in Spanish cannabis social clubs: "The moment you enter the door, you are minimising the risks".西班牙大麻社交俱乐部的定性研究:“你一进门,就在将风险最小化”。
Int J Drug Policy. 2016 Aug;34:49-57. doi: 10.1016/j.drugpo.2016.04.009. Epub 2016 Apr 20.
7
"The difference is in the tomato at the end": Understanding the motivations and practices of cannabis growers operating within Belgian Cannabis Social Clubs.“区别在于最后的番茄”:了解在比利时大麻社交俱乐部内经营的大麻种植者的动机和做法。
Int J Drug Policy. 2018 Jun;56:21-29. doi: 10.1016/j.drugpo.2018.02.016. Epub 2018 Mar 11.
8
Consumer agency in cannabis supply - Exploring auto-regulatory documents of the cannabis social clubs in Spain.消费者在大麻供应中的作用 - 探索西班牙大麻社交俱乐部的自我监管文件。
Int J Drug Policy. 2018 Apr;54:26-34. doi: 10.1016/j.drugpo.2017.12.018. Epub 2018 Feb 8.
9
How will cannabis legalization affect health, safety, and social equity outcomes? It largely depends on the 14 Ps.大麻合法化将如何影响健康、安全和社会公平结果?这在很大程度上取决于 14 个 P。
Am J Drug Alcohol Abuse. 2019;45(6):664-672. doi: 10.1080/00952990.2019.1611841. Epub 2019 Jul 2.
10
Cannabis Social Clubs in Contemporary Legalization Reforms: Talking Consumption Sites and Social Justice.当代合法化改革中的大麻社交俱乐部:论消费场所与社会正义
Clin Ther. 2023 Jun;45(6):551-559. doi: 10.1016/j.clinthera.2023.03.017.

引用本文的文献

1
Harm reduction strategies for cannabis-related problems: a literature review and typology.大麻相关问题的危害减少策略:文献综述与类型学分析
Eur Arch Psychiatry Clin Neurosci. 2025 Mar;275(2):379-388. doi: 10.1007/s00406-024-01839-3. Epub 2024 Jun 27.
2
Conflicting forces in the implementation of medicinal cannabis regulation in Uruguay.乌拉圭医用大麻监管实施过程中的冲突力量。
J Cannabis Res. 2023 Jul 12;5(1):26. doi: 10.1186/s42238-023-00189-6.
3
The costs and benefits of cannabis control policies
.大麻管制政策的成本与效益。
Dialogues Clin Neurosci. 2020 Sep;22(3):281-287. doi: 10.31887/DCNS.2020.22.3/whall.
4
Facing the option for the legalisation of cannabis use and supply in New Zealand: An overview of relevant evidence, concepts and considerations.面对新西兰大麻使用和供应合法化的选择:相关证据、概念和考虑因素概述。
Drug Alcohol Rev. 2020 Jul;39(5):555-567. doi: 10.1111/dar.13087. Epub 2020 May 20.