Rongkaumpan Ganittha, Amsbury Sam, Andablo-Reyes Efren, Linford Holly, Connell Simon, Knox J Paul, Sarkar Anwesha, Benitez-Alfonso Yoselin, Orfila Caroline
Nutritional Sciences and Epidemiology Group, School of Food Science and Nutrition, University of Leeds, Leeds, United Kingdom.
Centre for Plant Sciences, Faculty of Biological Sciences, University of Leeds, Leeds, United Kingdom.
Front Plant Sci. 2019 Jul 9;10:858. doi: 10.3389/fpls.2019.00858. eCollection 2019.
Banana () and mango () are two of the most popular fruits eaten worldwide. They both soften during ripening but their textural attributes are markedly different. This study aimed to elucidate the molecular mechanism underpinning textural differences between banana and mango. We used a novel combination of methods at different scales to analyse the surface properties of fruit cells and the potential contribution of cells and cell wall components to oral processing and texture perception. The results indicated that cell separation occurred easily in both organs under mild mechanical stress. Banana cells showed distinctively elongated shapes with distinct distribution of pectin and hemicellulose epitopes at the cell surface. In contrast, mango had relatively spherical cells that ruptured during cell separation. Atomic force microscopy detected soft surfaces indicative of middle lamella remnants on banana cells, while mango cells had cleaner, smoother surfaces, suggesting absence of middle lamellae and more advanced cell wall disassembly. Comparison of solubilized polymers by cell wall glycome analysis showed abundance of mannan and feruylated xylan in separation exudate from banana but not mango, but comparable levels of pectin and arabinogalactan proteins. Bulk rheology experiments showed that both fruits had similar apparent viscosity and hence might be extrapolated to have similar "oral thickness" perception. On the other hand, oral tribology experiments showed significant differences in their frictional behavior at orally relevant speeds. The instrumental lubrication behavior can be interpreted as "smooth" mouthfeel for mango as compared to "astringent" or "dry" for banana in the later stages of oral processing. The results suggest that cell wall surface properties contribute to lubricating behavior associated with textural perception in the oral phase.
香蕉()和芒果()是全球最受欢迎的两种水果。它们在成熟过程中都会变软,但质地特性明显不同。本研究旨在阐明香蕉和芒果质地差异背后的分子机制。我们采用了不同尺度的新方法组合,来分析果实细胞的表面特性以及细胞和细胞壁成分对口腔加工和质地感知的潜在贡献。结果表明,在温和的机械应力下,两个器官中的细胞都很容易分离。香蕉细胞呈现出明显细长的形状,细胞表面果胶和半纤维素表位分布独特。相比之下,芒果细胞相对呈球形,在细胞分离过程中会破裂。原子力显微镜检测到香蕉细胞表面有柔软表面,表明存在中层薄片残余物,而芒果细胞表面更干净、更光滑,这表明不存在中层薄片且细胞壁分解更深入。通过细胞壁糖组分析对溶解聚合物进行比较,结果显示香蕉分离渗出物中富含甘露聚糖和阿魏酸木聚糖,而芒果中没有,但果胶和阿拉伯半乳聚糖蛋白水平相当。整体流变学实验表明,两种水果的表观粘度相似,因此可以推断它们的“口腔厚度”感知相似。另一方面,口腔摩擦学实验表明,在与口腔相关的速度下,它们的摩擦行为存在显著差异。仪器润滑行为可以解释为,在口腔加工后期,芒果的口感“顺滑”,而香蕉的口感“涩”或“干”。结果表明,细胞壁表面特性有助于口腔阶段与质地感知相关的润滑行为。