• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

谁是公共自行车共享的“超级用户”?对不列颠哥伦比亚省温哥华市公共自行车共享会员的分析。

Who are the 'super-users' of public bike share? An analysis of public bike share members in Vancouver, BC.

作者信息

Winters Meghan, Hosford Kate, Javaheri Sana

机构信息

Faculty of Health Sciences, Simon Fraser University, 8888 University Drive, Burnaby, BC V5A1S6, Canada.

Centre for Hip Health and Mobility, 2635 Laurel Street, Vancouver, BC V5Z 1M9, Canada.

出版信息

Prev Med Rep. 2019 Jul 5;15:100946. doi: 10.1016/j.pmedr.2019.100946. eCollection 2019 Sep.

DOI:10.1016/j.pmedr.2019.100946
PMID:31338286
原文链接:https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC6627413/
Abstract

Public bike share programs have been critiqued for serving those who already bicycle, or more well-off individuals who already have a multitude of transportation options. While substantial research focuses on characteristics of public bike share members, it often overlooks their intensity of use which may relate more directly to transport and health gains. In this study we link system data with member survey data to characterize "super-users" of Vancouver's public bike share system. We used system data from September 1, 2016-August 31, 2017 to calculate member-specific trip rates (trips/month). We linked system data to demographic and travel data for members who completed an online survey in 2017 (1232 members who had made 89,945 trips). We defined super-users as those who made 20 or more trips/month. We used a logistic regression to model demographic and travel characteristics associated with super-users as compared to regular users. Of the 1232 members, 204 were super-users. Super-users made 47% of the trips and had a median trip rate of 29.3 trips/month. In adjusted models, super-users were more likely to be young, male, have household incomes below $75,000, and live and work near bike share docking stations. Super-users had fewer transportation options than regular users, with lower odds of having a personal bike or car share membership. Amongst members, we found a distinct demographic profile for super-users relative to regular users, suggesting that usage is an important consideration when quantifying transport and health gains, and the resulting equity implications of public bike share programs.

摘要

公共自行车共享项目因服务于那些已经骑自行车出行的人,或者是那些已经拥有多种交通选择的富裕人群而受到批评。虽然大量研究聚焦于公共自行车共享项目成员的特征,但往往忽视了他们的使用强度,而使用强度可能与交通和健康收益更直接相关。在本研究中,我们将系统数据与成员调查数据相结合,以描述温哥华公共自行车共享系统的“超级用户”特征。我们使用了2016年9月1日至2017年8月31日的系统数据来计算特定成员的出行率(每月出行次数)。我们将系统数据与2017年完成在线调查的成员的人口统计和出行数据相链接(1232名成员,共出行89945次)。我们将超级用户定义为每月出行20次或更多次的人。我们使用逻辑回归模型来模拟与普通用户相比,超级用户的人口统计和出行特征。在这1232名成员中,有204名是超级用户。超级用户完成了47%的出行,每月出行率中位数为29.3次。在调整后的模型中,超级用户更有可能是年轻人、男性,家庭收入低于75000美元,并且居住和工作地点靠近自行车共享停靠站。超级用户比普通用户的交通选择更少,拥有个人自行车或汽车共享会员资格的几率更低。在成员中,我们发现超级用户相对于普通用户有明显不同的人口统计特征,这表明在量化交通和健康收益以及公共自行车共享项目由此产生的公平影响时,使用情况是一个重要的考虑因素。

https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/8915/6627413/3c3abd936819/gr1.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/8915/6627413/3c3abd936819/gr1.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/8915/6627413/3c3abd936819/gr1.jpg

相似文献

1
Who are the 'super-users' of public bike share? An analysis of public bike share members in Vancouver, BC.谁是公共自行车共享的“超级用户”?对不列颠哥伦比亚省温哥华市公共自行车共享会员的分析。
Prev Med Rep. 2019 Jul 5;15:100946. doi: 10.1016/j.pmedr.2019.100946. eCollection 2019 Sep.
2
Helmet Use Among Personal Bicycle Riders and Bike Share Users in Vancouver, BC.不列颠哥伦比亚省温哥华市个人自行车骑手和共享单车使用者的头盔使用情况。
Am J Prev Med. 2017 Oct;53(4):465-472. doi: 10.1016/j.amepre.2017.04.013. Epub 2017 Jun 29.
3
Who is in the near market for bicycle sharing? Identifying current, potential, and unlikely users of a public bicycle share program in Vancouver, Canada.谁是共享单车的潜在市场?识别加拿大温哥华公共自行车共享计划的当前、潜在和不太可能的用户。
BMC Public Health. 2018 Nov 29;18(1):1326. doi: 10.1186/s12889-018-6246-3.
4
Helmet-Wearing Practices and Barriers in Toronto Bike-Share Users: a Case-Control Study.多伦多共享单车用户佩戴头盔的行为及障碍:一项病例对照研究。
CJEM. 2016 Jan;18(1):28-36. doi: 10.1017/cem.2015.22. Epub 2015 Jun 1.
5
Correlates of bike share use and its association with weight status at an urban university.城市大学校园内共享单车使用情况的相关因素及其与体重状况的关联。
PLoS One. 2022 Aug 3;17(8):e0270870. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0270870. eCollection 2022.
6
Identifying the factors affecting bike-sharing usage and degree of satisfaction in Ningbo, China.识别影响中国宁波共享单车使用情况和满意度的因素。
PLoS One. 2017 Sep 21;12(9):e0185100. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0185100. eCollection 2017.
7
Insights in Public Health: Initiating Bicycle Sharing in Hawai'i: Lessons Learned from a Small Pilot Bike Share Program.公共卫生洞察:在夏威夷启动共享单车项目:小型共享单车试点项目的经验教训
Hawaii J Med Public Health. 2015 Oct;74(10):348-51.
8
Evaluation of the impact of a public bicycle share program on population bicycling in Vancouver, BC.评估不列颠哥伦比亚省温哥华市公共自行车共享计划对居民骑行的影响。
Prev Med Rep. 2018 Oct 3;12:176-181. doi: 10.1016/j.pmedr.2018.09.014. eCollection 2018 Dec.
9
Changes in public bike usage after the COVID-19 outbreak: A survey of Seoul public bike sharing users.新冠疫情爆发后公共自行车使用情况的变化:一项对首尔公共自行车共享用户的调查。
Sustain Cities Soc. 2023 Sep;96:104716. doi: 10.1016/j.scs.2023.104716. Epub 2023 Jun 10.
10
Socio-Ecological Predictors of Frequent Bike Share Trips: Do Purposes Matter?社会生态因素对共享单车高频使用的预测作用:目的重要吗?
Int J Environ Res Public Health. 2020 Oct 20;17(20):7640. doi: 10.3390/ijerph17207640.

引用本文的文献

1
Behavior change interventions to promote adoption of e-bike shared mobility in a rural area: evidence from a mixed-method field trial.促进农村地区采用电动自行车共享出行的行为改变干预措施:来自一项混合方法现场试验的证据。
Front Psychol. 2025 May 20;16:1569176. doi: 10.3389/fpsyg.2025.1569176. eCollection 2025.
2
The effects of COVID-19 on female and male bike sharing users: Insights from Lisbon's .新冠疫情对共享单车男女用户的影响:来自里斯本的见解 。 (原文句子不完整,推测后面可能还有关于里斯本的具体内容)
Cities. 2023 Jan;132:104058. doi: 10.1016/j.cities.2022.104058. Epub 2022 Oct 25.
3
Changes in physical activity after joining a bikeshare program: a cohort of new bikeshare users.

本文引用的文献

1
The unrealised potential of bike share schemes to influence population physical activity levels - A narrative review.共享单车计划对影响人群体力活动水平的未实现潜力-叙事性综述。
Prev Med. 2017 Oct;103S:S7-S14. doi: 10.1016/j.ypmed.2017.02.015. Epub 2017 Feb 20.
2
Impact evaluation of a public bicycle share program on cycling: a case example of BIXI in Montreal, Quebec.公共自行车共享计划对骑行影响的评估:以魁北克省蒙特利尔的 BIXI 为例。
Am J Public Health. 2013 Mar;103(3):e85-92. doi: 10.2105/AJPH.2012.300917. Epub 2013 Jan 17.
3
Inequalities in usage of a public bicycle sharing scheme: socio-demographic predictors of uptake and usage of the London (UK) cycle hire scheme.
加入共享单车计划后身体活动的变化:一组新的共享单车使用者的队列研究。
Int J Behav Nutr Phys Act. 2022 Oct 4;19(1):132. doi: 10.1186/s12966-022-01353-6.
4
Equity implications of electric bikesharing in Philadelphia.费城电动共享单车的公平性影响
GeoJournal. 2023;88(2):1559-1617. doi: 10.1007/s10708-022-10698-1. Epub 2022 Jul 6.
5
Socio-Ecological Predictors of Frequent Bike Share Trips: Do Purposes Matter?社会生态因素对共享单车高频使用的预测作用:目的重要吗?
Int J Environ Res Public Health. 2020 Oct 20;17(20):7640. doi: 10.3390/ijerph17207640.
6
Evaluation of free-floating bike-share on a university campus using a multi-method approach.使用多方法途径对大学校园中的共享单车进行评估。
Prev Med Rep. 2019 Aug 28;16:100981. doi: 10.1016/j.pmedr.2019.100981. eCollection 2019 Dec.
公共自行车共享计划使用不平等:伦敦(英国)自行车租赁计划使用和使用的社会人口预测因素。
Prev Med. 2012 Jul;55(1):40-5. doi: 10.1016/j.ypmed.2012.05.002. Epub 2012 May 14.