• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

促进农村地区采用电动自行车共享出行的行为改变干预措施:来自一项混合方法现场试验的证据。

Behavior change interventions to promote adoption of e-bike shared mobility in a rural area: evidence from a mixed-method field trial.

作者信息

Wilson Mark, Whitmarsh Lorraine

机构信息

Department of Psychology, University of Bath, Bath, United Kingdom.

Centre for Climate Change and Social Transformations (CAST), University of Bath, Bath, United Kingdom.

出版信息

Front Psychol. 2025 May 20;16:1569176. doi: 10.3389/fpsyg.2025.1569176. eCollection 2025.

DOI:10.3389/fpsyg.2025.1569176
PMID:40463296
原文链接:https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC12131865/
Abstract

Encouraging a shift to sustainable travel modes is essential for achieving net zero goals. This mixed-method study investigates the adoption of e-bike shared mobility in a rural context. Partnering with Cornwall Council and the shared e-bike provider Beryl, the study trialed two behavior change interventions to encourage people to use active modes; 151 residents and 14 Council staff took part. The two interventions were: (1) free Beryl bike credits, so people gain experience of using the e-bike share scheme on a trial basis, and (2) the 'Pen portraits' visioning tool, which uses evidence-based narratives to motivate people to consider how they could reduce car use in their daily lives. The effectiveness of the interventions was assessed over a four-week period through comparison to a control condition. During the study, uptake of e-bike share increased from 7 to 31% for residents, and from 29 to 71% for Council staff. Commuting and leisure or exercise were the most common journey purposes, although the bikes were also used as a component of multimodal travel. Beryl bikes encouraged mode shift for short journeys (1-2 miles), with 28% of e-bike share journeys substituting private car use, resulting in estimated carbon emission savings of 96-626 g CO per journey. Relative to the control group, more people in each of the three intervention groups used a Beryl bike (Control group = 21% of residents used Beryl, compared to: the visioning tool = 31%; Beryl bike credits = 37%; and Beryl bike credits plus the visioning tool = 36%). However, these differences are not statistically significant. Participants reported strong agreement that e-bike share provides a range of practical benefits such as reduced concern about bike maintenance and theft, as well as co-benefits such as providing exercise and improving mental health. The article concludes with a discussion of the practical and analytical challenges for conducting behavior change interventions in real-world settings. These findings are relevant for local authorities who are interested in tools and behavioral approaches for engaging with the public on low-carbon travel.

摘要

鼓励向可持续出行方式转变对于实现净零目标至关重要。这项混合方法研究调查了农村地区电动自行车共享出行的采用情况。该研究与康沃尔郡议会以及电动自行车共享提供商贝丽尔合作,试验了两种行为改变干预措施,以鼓励人们使用主动出行方式;151名居民和14名议会工作人员参与其中。这两种干预措施分别是:(1)免费的贝丽尔自行车积分,让人们在试用基础上获得使用电动自行车共享计划的体验;(2)“人物特写”愿景工具,该工具使用基于证据的叙述来激励人们思考如何在日常生活中减少汽车使用。通过与对照条件进行比较,在为期四周的时间内评估了这些干预措施的有效性。在研究期间,居民对电动自行车共享的使用率从7%提高到了31%,议会工作人员的使用率从29%提高到了71%。通勤以及休闲或锻炼是最常见的出行目的,不过这些自行车也被用作多模式出行的一部分。贝丽尔自行车鼓励在短途出行(1 - 2英里)中实现出行方式转变,28%的电动自行车共享出行替代了私家车使用,估计每次出行可节省96 - 626克二氧化碳排放量。相对于对照组,三个干预组中的每一组使用贝丽尔自行车的人数都更多(对照组 = 21%的居民使用贝丽尔自行车,相比之下:愿景工具组 = 31%;贝丽尔自行车积分组 = 37%;贝丽尔自行车积分加愿景工具组 = 36%)。然而,这些差异在统计学上并不显著。参与者强烈认同电动自行车共享提供了一系列实际益处,如减少对自行车维护和盗窃的担忧,以及诸如提供锻炼和改善心理健康等协同效益。文章最后讨论了在现实环境中开展行为改变干预措施所面临的实际和分析挑战。这些研究结果对于那些对与公众就低碳出行进行互动的工具和行为方法感兴趣的地方当局具有参考价值。

https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/6ccb/12131865/769899209565/fpsyg-16-1569176-g007.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/6ccb/12131865/67e2f0021f1d/fpsyg-16-1569176-g001.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/6ccb/12131865/358f2a521fee/fpsyg-16-1569176-g002.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/6ccb/12131865/daafdde60e32/fpsyg-16-1569176-g003.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/6ccb/12131865/7ead530085ec/fpsyg-16-1569176-g004.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/6ccb/12131865/4032ba1bfa6f/fpsyg-16-1569176-g005.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/6ccb/12131865/c377be57a35f/fpsyg-16-1569176-g006.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/6ccb/12131865/769899209565/fpsyg-16-1569176-g007.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/6ccb/12131865/67e2f0021f1d/fpsyg-16-1569176-g001.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/6ccb/12131865/358f2a521fee/fpsyg-16-1569176-g002.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/6ccb/12131865/daafdde60e32/fpsyg-16-1569176-g003.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/6ccb/12131865/7ead530085ec/fpsyg-16-1569176-g004.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/6ccb/12131865/4032ba1bfa6f/fpsyg-16-1569176-g005.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/6ccb/12131865/c377be57a35f/fpsyg-16-1569176-g006.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/6ccb/12131865/769899209565/fpsyg-16-1569176-g007.jpg

相似文献

1
Behavior change interventions to promote adoption of e-bike shared mobility in a rural area: evidence from a mixed-method field trial.促进农村地区采用电动自行车共享出行的行为改变干预措施:来自一项混合方法现场试验的证据。
Front Psychol. 2025 May 20;16:1569176. doi: 10.3389/fpsyg.2025.1569176. eCollection 2025.
2
Folic acid supplementation and malaria susceptibility and severity among people taking antifolate antimalarial drugs in endemic areas.在流行地区,服用抗叶酸抗疟药物的人群中,叶酸补充剂与疟疾易感性和严重程度的关系。
Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2022 Feb 1;2(2022):CD014217. doi: 10.1002/14651858.CD014217.
3
The impact of e-cycling on travel behaviour: A scoping review.电子自行车对出行行为的影响:一项范围综述。
J Transp Health. 2020 Dec;19:100910. doi: 10.1016/j.jth.2020.100910. Epub 2020 Aug 29.
4
5
Exploring the factors influencing the use of electrically assisted bikes (e-bikes) by stroke survivors: a mixed methods multiple case study.探索影响中风幸存者使用电动助力自行车(电动自行车)的因素:一项混合方法多案例研究。
Disabil Rehabil. 2022 Apr;44(8):1389-1398. doi: 10.1080/09638288.2020.1817986. Epub 2020 Sep 18.
6
Impacts of COVID-19 on Bike-Share Usage: The case of Daejeon, Korea.新冠疫情对共享单车使用情况的影响:以韩国大田市为例。
Transp Res Interdiscip Perspect. 2023 Jun 9:100856. doi: 10.1016/j.trip.2023.100856.
7
Evaluating the impacts of new walking and cycling infrastructure on carbon dioxide emissions from motorized travel: a controlled longitudinal study.评估新的步行和自行车基础设施对机动化出行二氧化碳排放的影响:一项对照纵向研究。
Appl Energy. 2014 Sep 1;128:284-295. doi: 10.1016/j.apenergy.2014.04.072.
8
Spatiotemporal variability and prediction of e-bike battery levels in bike-sharing systems.共享单车系统中电动自行车电池电量的时空变化及预测
Sci Rep. 2025 Feb 28;15(1):7171. doi: 10.1038/s41598-025-88952-y.
9
Exploring built environment factors on e-bike travel behavior in urban China: A case study of Jinan.探究中国城市电动自行车出行行为的建成环境因素:以济南为例。
Front Public Health. 2022 Sep 12;10:1013421. doi: 10.3389/fpubh.2022.1013421. eCollection 2022.
10
Promoting cycling: a review of interventions.促进自行车出行:干预措施综述。
Clin J Sport Med. 2011 Nov;21(6):542-4. doi: 10.1097/01.jsm.0000407931.13102.0b.

引用本文的文献

1
Helmet (Health impact of e-bikes and e-scooters) study: Data collection methods and information gathered for the evaluation of the introduction of share hire schemes.头盔(电动自行车和电动滑板车对健康的影响)研究:为评估共享租赁计划的引入而收集的数据收集方法和信息。
NIHR Open Res. 2025 May 7;5:44. doi: 10.3310/nihropenres.13857.1. eCollection 2025.

本文引用的文献

1
Behaviour change to address climate change.为应对气候变化而进行的行为改变。
Curr Opin Psychol. 2021 Dec;42:76-81. doi: 10.1016/j.copsyc.2021.04.002. Epub 2021 Apr 14.
2
Two Birds, One Stone: The Effectiveness of Health and Environmental Messages to Reduce Meat Consumption and Encourage Pro-environmental Behavioral Spillover.一石二鸟:健康与环境信息对减少肉类消费及促进环保行为溢出效应的有效性。
Front Psychol. 2020 Oct 7;11:577111. doi: 10.3389/fpsyg.2020.577111. eCollection 2020.
3
How psychology can help limit climate change.
心理学如何帮助限制气候变化。
Am Psychol. 2021 Jan;76(1):130-144. doi: 10.1037/amp0000624. Epub 2020 Mar 23.
4
Meta-analysis of randomised controlled trials testing behavioural interventions to promote household action on climate change.随机对照试验的荟萃分析,以测试促进家庭采取行动应对气候变化的行为干预措施。
Nat Commun. 2019 Oct 4;10(1):4545. doi: 10.1038/s41467-019-12457-2.
5
Who are the 'super-users' of public bike share? An analysis of public bike share members in Vancouver, BC.谁是公共自行车共享的“超级用户”?对不列颠哥伦比亚省温哥华市公共自行车共享会员的分析。
Prev Med Rep. 2019 Jul 5;15:100946. doi: 10.1016/j.pmedr.2019.100946. eCollection 2019 Sep.
6
Dealing with the positive publication bias: Why you should really publish your negative results.应对阳性发表偏倚:为什么您真的应该发表阴性结果。
Biochem Med (Zagreb). 2017 Oct 15;27(3):030201. doi: 10.11613/BM.2017.030201.
7
Treatment effects in randomized longitudinal trials with different types of nonignorable dropout.具有不同类型不可忽略缺失的随机纵向试验中的处理效应。
Psychol Methods. 2014 Jun;19(2):188-210. doi: 10.1037/a0033804. Epub 2013 Sep 30.
8
The behaviour change wheel: a new method for characterising and designing behaviour change interventions.行为改变轮:一种描述和设计行为改变干预措施的新方法。
Implement Sci. 2011 Apr 23;6:42. doi: 10.1186/1748-5908-6-42.