Geneva University Hospitals, Ch, du Petit Bel-Air 2, 1225, Chêne-Bourg, Switzerland.
Faculty of Medicine, Geneva University, Geneva, Switzerland.
Psychiatr Q. 2019 Dec;90(4):693-702. doi: 10.1007/s11126-019-09659-8.
Delusional beliefs and their behavioral consequences are predominant symptoms in patients with psychosis and play an important role in the treatment. Delusional beliefs are a multidimensional concept which can be divided into three components: distress, preoccupation and conviction of delusions. These can be measured using Peters delusions inventory (PDI-21). We question, whether changes in delusional beliefs over time during treatment measured with the PDI-21 can predict changes in belief flexibility measured with the Maudsley assessment of delusions schedule (MADS). We used a group of patients from a randomized controlled trial for a cognitive intervention for psychosis or psychotic symptoms. Aside standard treatment for psychosis, half of the patients took part in a group treatment "Michael's game". Patients were assessed at baseline (T1), at 3 months (T2), and at 9 months (T3). We measured delusional beliefs using PDI-21 and belief flexibility with the MADS. One hundred seventy-two patients were included in the analysis. We measured a main effect of PDI-21scores on belief flexibility measured with MADS. PDI-21 Conviction scores predicted outcomes for all measured MADS items. Increasing PDI Distress and Preoccupation scores were predictors for being more likely to dismiss beliefs and change conviction. Time itself was a predictor for changing conviction and being able to plan a behavioral experiment. Overall the changes in PDI scores predicted outcomes for belief flexibility measured with MADS items. The PDI-21 could be a simple and effective way to measure progress in treatment on delusional beliefs.
妄想信念及其行为后果是精神病患者的主要症状,在治疗中起着重要作用。妄想信念是一个多维概念,可以分为三个组成部分:困扰、关注和妄想的坚信。这些可以用彼得斯妄想量表(PDI-21)来衡量。我们质疑,在治疗过程中使用 PDI-21 测量的妄想信念随时间的变化是否可以预测使用莫兹利妄想量表(MADS)测量的信念灵活性的变化。我们使用了一项针对精神分裂症或精神病症状认知干预的随机对照试验的患者群体。除了精神病的标准治疗外,一半的患者参加了一个名为“迈克尔游戏”的小组治疗。患者在基线(T1)、3 个月(T2)和 9 个月(T3)进行评估。我们使用 PDI-21 测量妄想信念,使用 MADS 测量信念灵活性。172 名患者纳入分析。我们测量了 PDI-21 评分对 MADS 测量的信念灵活性的主要影响。PDI-21 坚信评分预测了所有测量的 MADS 项目的结果。PDI 困扰和关注评分的增加是更有可能放弃信念和改变坚信的预测因素。时间本身是改变信念和能够进行行为实验的预测因素。总的来说,PDI 评分的变化预测了 MADS 项目测量的信念灵活性的结果。PDI-21 可以是一种简单有效的方法来衡量治疗中妄想信念的进展。