Suppr超能文献

健康中国成年人中右旋兰索拉唑输注注射液与兰索拉唑的药代动力学/药效学评价。

Pharmacokinetic/Pharmacodynamic Evaluation of Dexlansoprazole Infusion Injection Compared with Lansoprazole in Healthy Chinese Adults.

机构信息

Research Center of Clinical Pharmacy, First Affliated Hospital, College of Medicine, Zhejiang University, #79 Qingchun Road, Hangzhou, 310003, China.

Zhejiang Provincial Key Laboratory for Drug Evaluation and Clinical Research, Hangzhou, China.

出版信息

Clin Drug Investig. 2019 Oct;39(10):953-965. doi: 10.1007/s40261-019-00824-2.

Abstract

BACKGROUND AND OBJECTIVE

This study was performed in healthy Chinese subjects to evaluate the safety and pharmacokinetic/pharmacodynamic characteristics of a novel injection formulation of dexlansoprazole in the context of single and multiple administration, compared with the original lansoprazole injection.

METHODS

Helicobacter pylori-negative healthy volunteers were recruited, and 70 participants were enrolled into five dosing groups (seven males and seven females in each group), including 15 mg once daily (qd), 15 mg every 12 h (q12h), 30 mg qd and 30 mg q12h of dexlansoprazole treatment for 5 days, as well as 30 mg q12h of lansoprazole treatment for 5 days. Blood samples were collected at scheduled time spots postdose on day 1 (first dose) and day 5 (last dose). Twenty-four-hour intragastric pH was continuously monitored on day 0 (baseline) and days 1 and 5. Dexlansoprazole and S-lansoprazole in human plasma were determined by validated chiral liquid chromatography with tandem mass spectrometry, and the pharmacokinetic parameters were determined by a non-compartmental method using Phoenix WinNonlin software. Safety assessment included changes in vital signs and laboratory tests, physical examination findings, and incidence or reports of adverse events.

RESULTS

The half-life (t) and clearance (CL) of dexlansoprazole were 1.76-2.06 h and 4.52-5.40 L/h, respectively, while the t and CL of S-lansoprazole were 0.87-1.02 h and 34.66-35.98 L/h, respectively. No drug accumulation after repeated administration was noted. Administration of lansoprazole 30 mg resulted in higher area under the concentration-time curve from time zero to the last measurable concentration (AUC) of dexlansoprazole than that of dexlansoprazole 15 mg (p = 0.026). Zero to 24 h after q12h multiple dosing, median and mean intragastric pH, percentage of time with the intragastric pH above 4.0 [TpH ≥ 4.0(%)] and percentage of time with the intragastric pH above 6.0 [TpH ≥ 6.0(%)] in the dexlansoprazole 15 mg q12h group were 6.07 ± 0.61, 5.70 ± 0.76, 83.58 ± 12.34, and 53.70 ± 17.06, respectively, which was similar to the lansoprazole 30 mg q12h group, i.e. 6.15 ± 0.62, 5.88 ± 0.67, 87.26 ± 12.08 and 57.00 ± 16.35, respectively. A weak positive correlation between dexlansoprazole AUC and baseline-adjusted TpH ≥ 4.0(%) over 0-24 h was observed, with Pearson correlation coefficients of 0.437 (p = 0.029), while no correlation was observed between AUC and baseline-adjusted TpH ≥ 6.0(%) over 0-24 h.

CONCLUSION

Every 12 h intravenous dosing of dexlansoprazole up to 30 mg for 5 days was safe and well-tolerated in healthy Chinese subjects. Every 12 h dosing of dexlansoprazole 15 mg has a comparable effect of gastric acid inhibition as lansoprazole 30 mg q12h.

TRIAL REGISTRATION

ClinicalTrials.gov ID NCT03120273.

摘要

背景和目的

本研究在中国健康受试者中进行,旨在评估新型注射用右旋兰索拉唑相对于原研兰索拉唑注射剂的单次和多次给药的安全性和药代动力学/药效学特征。

方法

招募了幽门螺杆菌阴性的健康志愿者,将 70 名参与者纳入五个给药组(每组 7 名男性和 7 名女性),包括 15mg 每日一次(qd)、15mg 每 12 小时(q12h)、30mg qd 和 30mg q12h 的治疗 5 天,以及 30mg q12h 的兰索拉唑治疗 5 天。在第 1 天(第 1 次剂量)和第 5 天(最后一次剂量),在给药后预定时间点采集血样。在第 0 天(基线)和第 1 天和第 5 天连续监测 24 小时胃内 pH 值。通过验证的手性液相色谱-串联质谱法测定人血浆中的右旋兰索拉唑和 S-兰索拉唑,并使用 Phoenix WinNonlin 软件非房室法计算药代动力学参数。安全性评估包括生命体征和实验室检查、体格检查结果以及不良事件的发生或报告。

结果

右旋兰索拉唑的半衰期(t)和清除率(CL)分别为 1.76-2.06h 和 4.52-5.40L/h,而 S-兰索拉唑的 t 和 CL 分别为 0.87-1.02h 和 34.66-35.98L/h。重复给药后未观察到药物蓄积。兰索拉唑 30mg 给药后,与右旋兰索拉唑 15mg 相比,右旋兰索拉唑的 AUC0-t 更高(p=0.026)。在 q12h 多次给药后 0-24 小时,右旋兰索拉唑 15mg q12h 组的中位和平均胃内 pH 值、胃内 pH 值高于 4.0 [TpH≥4.0(%)]的时间百分比和胃内 pH 值高于 6.0 [TpH≥6.0(%)]的时间百分比分别为 6.07±0.61、5.70±0.76、83.58±12.34 和 53.70±17.06,与兰索拉唑 30mg q12h 组相似,即 6.15±0.62、5.88±0.67、87.26±12.08 和 57.00±16.35。观察到右旋兰索拉唑 AUC 与 0-24 小时内基线调整后的 TpH≥4.0(%)之间存在弱正相关,Pearson 相关系数为 0.437(p=0.029),而 AUC 与 0-24 小时内基线调整后的 TpH≥6.0(%)之间无相关性。

结论

在中国健康受试者中,连续 5 天每天静脉注射右旋兰索拉唑高达 30mg,每 12 小时给药 1 次,是安全且耐受良好的。右旋兰索拉唑 15mg 每 12 小时给药与兰索拉唑 30mg q12h 给药的抑酸作用相当。

试验注册

ClinicalTrials.gov ID NCT03120273。

https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/c97a/6765692/fd2e9a545435/40261_2019_824_Fig1_HTML.jpg

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验