1Department of Psychology, University of California, Los Angeles, Los Angeles, California.
2Department of Psychology, Washington State University, Pullman, Washington.
Cyberpsychol Behav Soc Netw. 2019 Aug;22(8):529-534. doi: 10.1089/cyber.2019.0135. Epub 2019 Jul 24.
Studies on narcissism in social media have been numerous. Manifestations of narcissistic behaviors are typically viewed negatively by others online. However, previous study is limited by only examining agentic narcissism. This study investigated perceptions of both agentic and communal narcissism in the context of Facebook. Two hundred and sixty undergraduate students viewed fictitious Facebook profiles with narcissistic or neutral status updates and rated the target on likeability, successfulness, and whether they would want to be friends with the target. Narcissistic statuses were viewed more negatively than neutral statuses across domains. Agentic narcissistic statuses were viewed most harshly. Some gender differences emerged. Female participants rated agentic narcissistic statements from female targets and communal narcissistic statements from male targets more negatively than did male participants. Participants' self-reported communal narcissism was related to their ratings of others, whereas self-reported agentic narcissism was not. Implications of these findings are discussed.
社交媒体上的自恋研究层出不穷。他人在网上对自恋行为的表现通常持负面看法。然而,之前的研究仅限于考察代理型自恋。本研究在 Facebook 背景下考察了代理型和共众型自恋的认知。260 名本科生观看了带有自恋或中性状态更新的虚构 Facebook 个人资料,并根据喜好程度、成功度以及是否愿意与目标成为朋友对目标进行了评价。在各个领域,自恋状态都比中性状态受到更负面的评价。代理型自恋状态受到的评价最为苛刻。一些性别差异显现出来。女性参与者对来自女性目标的代理型自恋陈述和来自男性目标的共众型自恋陈述的评价比对男性参与者的评价更为负面。参与者的共众型自恋自评与其对他人的评价有关,而代理型自恋自评则不然。这些发现的意义将在下文进行讨论。