越南因脓毒症休克和登革热休克导致灾难性医疗支出。
Catastrophic health care expenditure due to septic shock and dengue shock in Vietnam.
机构信息
Department of Global Health and Infection, Brighton and Sussex Medical School, Falmer, Brighton, England.
Oxford University Clinical Research Unit, 764 Vo Van Kiet, Quan 5, Ho Chi Minh City, Vietnam.
出版信息
Trans R Soc Trop Med Hyg. 2019 Oct 11;113(10):649-651. doi: 10.1093/trstmh/trz064.
Abstract
BACKGROUND
The cost of treatment for infectious shock in intensive care in Vietnam is unknown.
METHODS
We prospectively investigated hospital bills for adults treated for septic and dengue shock in Vietnam and calculated the proportion who faced catastrophic health care expenditures.
RESULTS
The median hospital bills were US$617 for septic shock (n=100) and US$57 for dengue shock (n=88). Catastrophic payments were incurred by 47% (47/100) and 13% (11/88) of patients with septic shock and dengue shock, respectively, and 56% (25/45) and 84% (5/6) fatal cases of septic shock and dengue shock respectively.
CONCLUSIONS
Further advocacy is required to moderate insurance co-payments for costly critical care interventions.
摘要
背景
越南重症监护室感染性休克治疗费用尚不清楚。
方法
我们前瞻性地调查了越南成人脓毒症和登革热休克治疗的住院费用，并计算了灾难性医疗支出的比例。
结果
脓毒症休克患者的住院费用中位数为 617 美元（n=100），登革热休克患者为 57 美元（n=88）。分别有 47%（47/100）和 13%（11/88）的脓毒症休克和登革热休克患者需要灾难性支付，分别有 56%（25/45）和 84%（5/6）的脓毒症休克和登革热休克死亡病例需要灾难性支付。
结论
需要进一步倡导适度降低昂贵的重症监护干预的保险共付额。
相似文献
1
Catastrophic health care expenditure due to septic shock and dengue shock in Vietnam.越南因脓毒症休克和登革热休克导致灾难性医疗支出。
Trans R Soc Trop Med Hyg. 2019 Oct 11;113(10):649-651. doi: 10.1093/trstmh/trz064.
2
Catastrophic household costs due to injury in Vietnam.因伤致贫的越南家庭。
Injury. 2013 May;44(5):684-90. doi: 10.1016/j.injury.2012.05.006. Epub 2012 May 31.
3
Severe injuries and household catastrophic health expenditure in Vietnam: findings from the Household Living Standard Survey 2014.越南的严重伤害和家庭灾难性卫生支出：2014 年家庭生活水平调查结果。
Public Health. 2019 Sep;174:145-153. doi: 10.1016/j.puhe.2019.06.006. Epub 2019 Jul 31.
4
Use of high-level health facilities and catastrophic expenditure in Vietnam: can health insurance moderate this relationship?越南对高级卫生机构的使用和灾难性支出：医疗保险能否缓和这种关系？
BMC Health Serv Res. 2019 May 21;19(1):318. doi: 10.1186/s12913-019-4115-0.
5
Catastrophic health expenditure.灾难性卫生支出
Lancet. 2003 Sep 20;362(9388):996; author reply 997. doi: 10.1016/S0140-6736(03)14375-9.
6
Inequalities in Household Catastrophic Health Expenditure and Impoverishment Associated With Noncommunicable Diseases in Chi Linh, Hai Duong, Vietnam.越南海阳省吉灵市家庭灾难性卫生支出及与非传染性疾病相关的贫困问题中的不平等现象。
Asia Pac J Public Health. 2017 Jul;29(5_suppl):35S-44S. doi: 10.1177/1010539517712919.
7
Cost of hospitalization for childbirth in India: how equitable it is in the post-NRHM era?印度分娩住院费用：在后国家农村卫生使命时代有多公平？
BMC Res Notes. 2017 Aug 15;10(1):409. doi: 10.1186/s13104-017-2729-z.
8
The importance of assessing out-of-pocket payments when the financing of antiretroviral therapy is transitioned to domestic funding: findings from Vietnam.当抗逆转录病毒疗法的资金来源转向国内资助时评估自费支付的重要性：越南的研究结果
Trop Med Int Health. 2017 Jul;22(7):908-916. doi: 10.1111/tmi.12897. Epub 2017 Jun 14.
9
Household costs of hospitalized dengue illness in semi-rural Thailand.泰国半农村地区登革热住院病例的家庭成本。
PLoS Negl Trop Dis. 2017 Sep 22;11(9):e0005961. doi: 10.1371/journal.pntd.0005961. eCollection 2017 Sep.
10
Disease-specific out-of-pocket and catastrophic health expenditure on hospitalization in India: Do Indian households face distress health financing?印度住院治疗的特定疾病自付费用和灾难性卫生支出：印度家庭面临困境性卫生筹资吗？
PLoS One. 2018 May 10;13(5):e0196106. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0196106. eCollection 2018.
引用本文的文献
1
Evidence based QUality Improvement for Prescribing Stewardship in ICU (EQUIPS-ICU): protocol for type III hybrid implementation-effectiveness study.重症监护病房处方管理的循证质量改进（EQUIPS-ICU）：III型混合实施-效果研究方案
Implement Sci. 2025 Feb 25;20(1):12. doi: 10.1186/s13012-024-01413-4.
2
Management of adult sepsis in resource-limited settings: global expert consensus statements using a Delphi method.资源有限环境下成人脓毒症的管理：采用德尔菲法的全球专家共识声明
Intensive Care Med. 2025 Jan;51(1):21-38. doi: 10.1007/s00134-024-07735-7. Epub 2024 Dec 23.
3
Magnitude of Septic Shock and its Associated Factors Among Critically Ill COVID-19 Patients at Addis Ababa COVID-19 Care Centers, Ethiopia.埃塞俄比亚亚的斯亚贝巴新冠病毒疾病护理中心危重症新冠病毒疾病患者的感染性休克严重程度及其相关因素
SAGE Open Nurs. 2024 Oct 3;10:23779608241281865. doi: 10.1177/23779608241281865. eCollection 2024 Jan-Dec.
4
Financial hardship among patients suffering from neglected tropical diseases: A systematic review and meta-analysis of global literature.被忽视的热带病患者的经济困难：全球文献的系统评价和荟萃分析。
PLoS Negl Trop Dis. 2024 May 13;18(5):e0012086. doi: 10.1371/journal.pntd.0012086. eCollection 2024 May.
5
Mapping patient pathways and understanding clinical decision-making in dengue management to inform the development of digital health tools.绘制登革热管理中的患者路径图并了解临床决策，以为数字健康工具的开发提供信息。
BMC Med Inform Decis Mak. 2023 Feb 2;23(1):24. doi: 10.1186/s12911-023-02116-4.
6
Direct Medical Costs of Tetanus, Dengue, and Sepsis Patients in an Intensive Care Unit in Vietnam.越南重症监护病房破伤风、登革热和脓毒症患者的直接医疗费用。
Front Public Health. 2022 Jun 20;10:893200. doi: 10.3389/fpubh.2022.893200. eCollection 2022.
7
Estimating the effectiveness of national health insurance in covering catastrophic health expenditure: Evidence from South Korea.估算国家健康保险在覆盖灾难性卫生支出方面的效果：来自韩国的证据。
PLoS One. 2021 Aug 19;16(8):e0255677. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0255677. eCollection 2021.
8
Microvascular dysfunction in septic and dengue shock: Pathophysiology and implications for clinical management.脓毒症和登革热休克中的微血管功能障碍：病理生理学及其对临床管理的意义。
Glob Cardiol Sci Pract. 2020 Nov 30;2020(2):e202029. doi: 10.21542/gcsp.2020.29.
本文引用的文献
1
Current challenges in the management of sepsis in ICUs in resource-poor settings and suggestions for the future.在资源匮乏环境下的 ICU 中脓毒症管理的当前挑战和未来建议。
Intensive Care Med. 2017 May;43(5):612-624. doi: 10.1007/s00134-017-4750-z. Epub 2017 Mar 27.
2
The Third International Consensus Definitions for Sepsis and Septic Shock (Sepsis-3).《脓毒症及脓毒性休克第三次国际共识定义（脓毒症-3）》
JAMA. 2016 Feb 23;315(8):801-10. doi: 10.1001/jama.2016.0287.
3
The direct costs of intensive care management and risk factors for financial burden of patients with severe sepsis and septic shock.重症脓毒症和感染性休克患者重症监护管理的直接成本及经济负担的风险因素。
J Crit Care. 2015 Oct;30(5):929-34. doi: 10.1016/j.jcrc.2015.05.011. Epub 2015 May 20.
Zotero 插件