• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

经皮椎间孔镜下椎间盘切除术治疗腰椎管狭窄症合并骨质疏松症的疗效及安全性

Efficacy and safety of percutaneous transforaminal endoscopic discectomy in the treatment of lumbar spinal stenosis combined with osteoporosis.

作者信息

Gu Xiaobin, Zhu Wenhui, He Haiyi, Wang Zili, Ding Shaolong, Guo Gaosheng

机构信息

Department of Orthopedics, Sanmenxia Central Hospital, Sanmenxia 472000, China.

出版信息

Rev Assoc Med Bras (1992). 2019 Jul 22;65(6):779-785. doi: 10.1590/1806-9282.65.6.779.

DOI:10.1590/1806-9282.65.6.779
PMID:31340304
Abstract

OBJECTIVE

To investigate the efficacy and safety of percutaneous transforaminal endoscopic discectomy (PTED) in the treatment of lumbar spinal stenosis (LSS) combined with osteoporosis.

METHODS

Eighty patients with LSS combined with osteoporosis were divided into a control and PTED group, which received conventional transforaminal lumbar interbody fusion and PTED, respectively. The surgical indications, incision visual analogue scale (VAS), lumbar and leg pain VAS, lumbar Japanese Orthopaedic Association (JOA) and Oswestry disability index (ODI) scores, bone mineral density (BMD), and adverse reactions were observed.

RESULTS

Compared with the control group, in the PTED group, the operation time, bleeding loss and hospitalization duration, incision VAS scores at postoperative 12, 24 and 48 h and lumbar and leg pain VAS and lumbar ODI scores on postoperative 6 months were significantly decreased (P < 0.01), and the lumbar JOA score on postoperative 6 months was significantly increased (P < 0.05). There was no significant difference in BMD between two groups (P > 0.05). Compared with the control group, in the PTED group, the total effective rate was significantly higher (P < 0.05), and the incidence of adverse reactions was significantly lower (P < 0.05).

CONCLUSIONS

PTED is safe and effective in the treatment of LSS combined with osteoporosis.

摘要

目的

探讨经皮椎间孔镜下椎间盘切除术(PTED)治疗腰椎管狭窄症(LSS)合并骨质疏松症的疗效及安全性。

方法

将80例LSS合并骨质疏松症患者分为对照组和PTED组,分别接受传统经椎间孔腰椎椎间融合术和PTED。观察手术适应证、切口视觉模拟评分(VAS)、腰腿痛VAS、腰椎日本骨科协会(JOA)和Oswestry功能障碍指数(ODI)评分、骨密度(BMD)及不良反应。

结果

与对照组相比,PTED组手术时间、失血量及住院时间、术后12、24和48小时切口VAS评分以及术后6个月腰腿痛VAS和腰椎ODI评分均显著降低(P < 0.01),术后6个月腰椎JOA评分显著升高(P < 0.05)。两组BMD差异无统计学意义(P > 0.05)。与对照组相比,PTED组总有效率显著更高(P < 0.05),不良反应发生率显著更低(P < 0.05)。

结论

PTED治疗LSS合并骨质疏松症安全有效。

相似文献

1
Efficacy and safety of percutaneous transforaminal endoscopic discectomy in the treatment of lumbar spinal stenosis combined with osteoporosis.经皮椎间孔镜下椎间盘切除术治疗腰椎管狭窄症合并骨质疏松症的疗效及安全性
Rev Assoc Med Bras (1992). 2019 Jul 22;65(6):779-785. doi: 10.1590/1806-9282.65.6.779.
2
Evaluation of Percutaneous Transforaminal Endoscopic Discectomy in the Treatment of Lumbar Disc Herniation: A Retrospective Study.经皮椎间孔内镜下椎间盘切除术治疗腰椎间盘突出症的疗效评价:一项回顾性研究。
Orthop Surg. 2021 Apr;13(2):599-607. doi: 10.1111/os.12839. Epub 2020 Dec 14.
3
Transforaminal Endoscopic Discectomy and Foraminoplasty for Treating Central Lumbar Stenosis.经椎间孔内镜下椎间盘切除术和椎间孔成形术治疗中央型腰椎管狭窄症。
Orthop Surg. 2019 Dec;11(6):1093-1100. doi: 10.1111/os.12559. Epub 2019 Nov 12.
4
Percutaneous transforaminal endoscopic discectomy compared with microendoscopic discectomy for lumbar disc herniation: 1-year results of an ongoing randomized controlled trial.经皮椎间孔镜下椎间盘切除术与显微内镜下椎间盘切除术治疗腰椎间盘突出症的比较:一项正在进行的随机对照试验的1年结果
J Neurosurg Spine. 2018 Mar;28(3):300-310. doi: 10.3171/2017.7.SPINE161434. Epub 2018 Jan 5.
5
Comparison of percutaneous endoscopic transforaminal discectomy, microendoscopic discectomy, and microdiscectomy for symptomatic lumbar disc herniation: minimum 2-year follow-up results.经皮内镜下经椎间孔椎间盘切除术、显微内镜下椎间盘切除术和显微椎间盘切除术治疗症状性腰椎间盘突出症的比较:至少2年的随访结果
J Neurosurg Spine. 2018 Mar;28(3):317-325. doi: 10.3171/2017.6.SPINE172. Epub 2018 Jan 5.
6
Comparison of Percutaneous Transforaminal Endoscopic Discectomy and Microscope-Assisted Tubular Discectomy for Lumbar Disc Herniation.经皮椎间孔内镜下椎间盘切除术与显微镜辅助管状椎间盘切除术治疗腰椎间盘突出症的比较。
Orthop Surg. 2021 Jul;13(5):1587-1595. doi: 10.1111/os.12909. Epub 2021 Jun 10.
7
[A comparison of results between percutaneous transforaminal endoscopic discectomy and fenestration discectomy for lumbar disc herniation in the adolscents].青少年腰椎间盘突出症经皮椎间孔镜下椎间盘切除术与开窗髓核摘除术疗效比较
Zhonghua Yi Xue Za Zhi. 2015 Dec 15;95(47):3852-5.
8
Linical efficacy of percutaneous endoscopic lumbar discectomy for the treatment of lumbar spinal stenosis in elderly patients: a retrospective study.经皮内镜腰椎间盘切除术治疗老年腰椎管狭窄症的临床疗效:一项回顾性研究。
J Orthop Surg Res. 2020 Sep 24;15(1):441. doi: 10.1186/s13018-020-01968-0.
9
Percutaneous Transforaminal Endoscopic Discectomy and Fenestration Discectomy to Treat Posterior Ring Apophyseal Fractures: A Retrospective Cohort Study.经皮椎间孔内镜下椎间盘切除术和开窗式椎间盘切除术治疗后环椎弓根骨折:一项回顾性队列研究。
Orthop Surg. 2020 Aug;12(4):1092-1099. doi: 10.1111/os.12698. Epub 2020 Jun 24.
10
[Clinical study of exercise rehabilitation and gait analysis during the perioperative period of lumbar percutaneous transforaminal endoscopic discectomy].腰椎经皮椎间孔镜下椎间盘切除术围手术期运动康复与步态分析的临床研究
Zhongguo Gu Shang. 2018 Apr 25;31(4):311-316. doi: 10.3969/j.issn.1003-0034.2018.04.004.

引用本文的文献

1
Use of the Oswestry Disability Index in ankylosing spondylitis.使用 Oswestry 残疾指数评估强直性脊柱炎。
Rev Assoc Med Bras (1992). 2023 Nov 13;69(12):e20230927. doi: 10.1590/1806-9282.20230927. eCollection 2023.
2
Diagnostic, Surgical, and Technical Considerations for Lumbar Interbody Fusion in Patients with Osteopenia and Osteoporosis: A Systematic Review.骨质疏松症和骨质减少患者腰椎椎间融合术的诊断、手术及技术考量:一项系统综述
Brain Sci. 2021 Feb 14;11(2):241. doi: 10.3390/brainsci11020241.
3
Astragaloside IV protects against iron loading-induced abnormal differentiation of bone marrow mesenchymal stem cells (BMSCs).
黄芪甲苷可防止铁负荷诱导的骨髓间充质干细胞(BMSCs)异常分化。
FEBS Open Bio. 2021 Apr;11(4):1223-1236. doi: 10.1002/2211-5463.13082. Epub 2021 Mar 17.