Suppr超能文献

青少年腰椎间盘突出症经皮椎间孔镜下椎间盘切除术与开窗髓核摘除术疗效比较

[A comparison of results between percutaneous transforaminal endoscopic discectomy and fenestration discectomy for lumbar disc herniation in the adolscents].

作者信息

Li Jie, Ma Chao, Li Yiming, Liu Guangwang, Wang Dong, Dai Weixiang, Tian Jiwei

出版信息

Zhonghua Yi Xue Za Zhi. 2015 Dec 15;95(47):3852-5.

Abstract

OBJECTIVE

To compare the preliminary clinical outcomes of percutaneous transforaminal endoscopic discectomy (PTED) and fenestration discectomy (FD) for lumbar disc herniation in the adolscents and further to summarize the clinical experience.

METHODS

The data of 56 patients with single segment lumbar disc herniation who were adopted by our department from January 2011 to December 2013 were retrospectively studied. All patients were divided into 2 groups, including 30 patients undergoing PTED and 26 patients undergoing FD respectively. The factors including the length of skin incision, amount of intraoperative bleeding, operation time and duration of hospitalization were compared. Pfirrmann grading system was used for assessment of lumbar disc degeneration preoperatively and 1 year later. The visual analogue scale (VAS), Oswestry Disability Index (ODI) and Japanese Orthopedic Association (JOA) scores were used to measure the clinical outcomes.

RESULTS

There were significant differences in the observation factors such as the skin incision length, amount of intraoperative bleeding, operation time and duration of hospitalization between the PTED and FD groups (P < 0.05). After surgery, the patients in both groups were followed up for 12 months on average respectively. The postoperative lumbar disc degeneration in PTED group was decreased than that of in FD group. The postoperative VAS scores, ODI and JOA scores at each follow-up time point in both groups were significantly improved when compared with the preoperative ones (P < 0.05). There were no statistically significant differences between the 2 groups in the JOA score improvement rate (P > 0.05). According to 'the modified MacNab criteria, there were no statistically significant differences between the 2 groups in the excellent and good rate (P > 0.05).

CONCLUSIONS

The preliminary clinical efficacy of both PTED and FD in the treatment of single segment lumbar disc herniation in the adolscents is satisfactory. However, PTED is a better minimally invasive surgical method with such advantages as less trauma, less blood loss, early function recovery, less effect on lumbar spinal stability and so on. The short-term outcomes of PTED are similar to that of FD.

摘要

目的

比较经皮椎间孔镜下椎间盘切除术(PTED)与开窗髓核摘除术(FD)治疗青少年腰椎间盘突出症的初步临床疗效,并总结临床经验。

方法

回顾性分析2011年1月至2013年12月我科收治的56例单节段腰椎间盘突出症患者的资料。所有患者分为2组,分别为接受PTED的30例患者和接受FD的26例患者。比较两组患者的皮肤切口长度、术中出血量、手术时间和住院时间等因素。采用Pfirrmann分级系统对术前及术后1年的腰椎间盘退变情况进行评估。采用视觉模拟评分法(VAS)、Oswestry功能障碍指数(ODI)和日本骨科学会(JOA)评分来衡量临床疗效。

结果

PTED组与FD组在皮肤切口长度、术中出血量、手术时间和住院时间等观察指标上存在显著差异(P<0.05)。术后两组患者平均随访12个月。PTED组术后腰椎间盘退变程度较FD组减轻。两组各随访时间点的术后VAS评分、ODI和JOA评分与术前相比均显著改善(P<0.05)。两组JOA评分改善率差异无统计学意义(P>0.05)。根据改良MacNab标准,两组优良率差异无统计学意义(P>0.05)。

结论

PTED和FD治疗青少年单节段腰椎间盘突出症的初步临床疗效均满意。然而,PTED是一种更好的微创手术方法,具有创伤小、出血少、功能恢复早、对腰椎稳定性影响小等优点。PTED的短期疗效与FD相似。

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验