Suppr超能文献

预测初产妇引产的持续时间。

Predicting the duration of induction of labour in nulliparous women.

作者信息

Jung Albert, Beckmann Michael

机构信息

Mater Mothers' Hospital, Queensland, Australia.

出版信息

J Obstet Gynaecol. 2020 Feb;40(2):167-170. doi: 10.1080/01443615.2019.1606173. Epub 2019 Jul 25.

Abstract

This study examined if the modified Bishops score (MBS) at the start of an induction of labour (IOL) (VE-1) or if the MBS after pharmacological/mechanical ripening (VE-2) was the better predictor of the duration of induced labour and whether there was one component of the score that was most predictive of time to delivery.The measures at VE-2 were correlated more strongly with the time to birth, than VE-1 measures. At both VE-1 and VE-2, component measures (especially position of the cervix) showed weak correlation compared to composite measures. Omitting position from the composite score resulted in a simplified modified Bishops score (sMBS) that had the highest correlation coefficients. A model comprising sMBS and 5 clinical variables explained ∼73% of the variance.The vaginal examination findings prior to an IOL do not impact how long the labour may take. A more favourable cervix ∼12 h later (measured using a 4-item composite of dilatation, length, consistency and station) predicts a quicker induced labour.Impact statement Induction of labour (IOL) is a common obstetric intervention in Australia. The IOL process can be a protracted and sometimes frustrating experience for women, and it may not result in a vaginal birth. A 'failed induction' or 'failure to progress' are relatively common indications for caesarean section (CS) in this setting where, despite many hours of an oxytocin infusion, the woman does not establish or progress in the active phase of labour. The measures at VE-2 were correlated more strongly with the time to birth, than VE-1 measures. At both VE-1 and VE-2, component measures (especially position of the cervix) showed weak correlation compared to composite measures. Omitting position from the composite score resulted in a simplified modified Bishops score (sMBS) that had the highest correlation coefficients. A model comprising sMBS and 5 clinical variables explained ∼73% of the variance. It is not the initial VE that is most predictive of the duration of labour but rather the VE after cervical ripening (mechanical or pharmacological). Simplified MBS (without the component of position of cervix) is most predictive of labour duration.

摘要

本研究探讨了引产(IOL)开始时的改良Bishop评分(MBS)(VE-1)或药物/机械促宫颈成熟后的MBS(VE-2)是否能更好地预测引产持续时间,以及该评分的一个组成部分是否最能预测分娩时间。与VE-1的测量值相比,VE-2的测量值与出生时间的相关性更强。在VE-1和VE-2时,与综合测量值相比,各组成测量值(尤其是宫颈位置)显示出较弱的相关性。从综合评分中剔除宫颈位置后,得到了相关系数最高的简化改良Bishop评分(sMBS)。一个包含sMBS和5个临床变量的模型解释了约73%的方差。引产之前的阴道检查结果不会影响产程的长短。约12小时后更有利的宫颈情况(使用扩张、长度、质地和胎位的4项综合指标测量)预示着引产更快。影响声明引产在澳大利亚是一种常见的产科干预措施。引产过程对女性来说可能是漫长的,有时令人沮丧,而且可能无法实现阴道分娩。在这种情况下,“引产失败”或“产程无进展”是剖宫产(CS)相对常见的指征,即尽管输注缩宫素数小时,但女性在产程活跃期仍未发动或进展。与VE-1的测量值相比,VE-2的测量值与出生时间的相关性更强。在VE-1和VE-2时,与综合测量值相比,各组成测量值(尤其是宫颈位置)显示出较弱的相关性。从综合评分中剔除宫颈位置后,得到了相关系数最高的简化改良Bishop评分(sMBS)。一个包含sMBS和5个临床变量的模型解释了约73%的方差。最能预测产程长短的不是最初的阴道检查,而是宫颈成熟(机械或药物)后的阴道检查。简化的MBS(不包括宫颈位置这一组成部分)最能预测产程长短。

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验