• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

常规与改良 COOK 宫颈扩张球囊用于足月引产的随机对照试验。

Conventional versus modified application of COOK Cervical Ripening Balloon for induction of labor at term: a randomized controlled trial.

机构信息

Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, Shengjing Hospital of China Medical University, Shenyang, Liaoning, China.

出版信息

BMC Pregnancy Childbirth. 2022 Oct 2;22(1):739. doi: 10.1186/s12884-022-05035-w.

DOI:10.1186/s12884-022-05035-w
PMID:36184583
原文链接:https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC9526905/
Abstract

BACKGROUND

This study aims to evaluate the efficacy and safety of the modified application of COOK Cervical Ripening Balloon (CCRB) for induction of labor (IOL) at term in primipara.

METHODS

A total of 227 singleton full-term pregnancies with indications of IOL were enrolled and randomly divided into the control and study groups in our hospital from January 2021 to December 2021. In the control group, a conventional method was used. Both the uterine and vaginal balloons were filled to 80 mL and removed after 12 h. In the study group, a modified method was used. The uterine and vaginal balloons were filled to 120 mL and 40 mL respectively. Light traction was given to help CCRB to be discharged after 12 h placement. Oxytocin was administered in both groups after CCRB was discharged before labor starting. The improved Bishop scores, duration of labor, and spontaneous delivery rate were evaluated in the two groups.

RESULTS

The improved Bishop scores in the study group were 3.06 ± 0.97 at 12 h placement of CCRB and 4.37 ± 0.87 when CCRB was discharged, which were significantly higher compared to the control group (2.52 ± 0.79, p < 0.05). Duration of the first stage of labor and the full labor in the study group were significantly shorter than those in the control group ((6.17 ± 2.85) h vs. (7.27 ± 2.90) h, p = 0.010; (7.07 ± 3.18) h vs. (8.09 ± 3.11) h, p = 0.028). No difference in spontaneous delivery rate between the two groups was observed. But the delivery rate within 24 h between the two groups was significantly different (79.79% vs. 55.91%, p < 0.05). For the cases with initial Bishop scores ≤ 3, the improved score was significantly increased, the first stage of labor and the full labor were significantly shorter in the study group than those in the control group (p < 0.05). Those results were not observed in cases with initial Bishop scores of 4-6.

CONCLUSIONS

The modified application of CCRB could benefit cervical ripening, shorten the duration of labor, especially for cases with poor cervical maturity, and improve the delivery rate within 24 h.

TRIAL REGISTRATION

Retrospectively registered: ChiCTR2200058270. Registered 04/04/2022.

摘要

背景

本研究旨在评估改良 COOK 宫颈扩张球囊(CCRB)在初产妇足月引产中的疗效和安全性。

方法

2021 年 1 月至 12 月,我院收治的 227 例有引产指征的单胎足月妊娠患者,随机分为对照组和观察组。对照组采用常规方法,子宫和阴道球囊分别充液至 80mL 和 40mL,12h 后取出。观察组采用改良方法,子宫和阴道球囊分别充液至 120mL 和 40mL,放置 12h 后轻拉协助 CCRB 排出,球囊排出后两组均给予缩宫素引产。比较两组改良 Bishop 评分、产程时间及自然分娩率。

结果

观察组 CCRB 放置 12h 时的改良 Bishop 评分为 3.06±0.97,球囊排出时为 4.37±0.87,均显著高于对照组的 2.52±0.79(均 P<0.05)。观察组第一产程和总产程时间均显著短于对照组[(6.17±2.85)h 比(7.27±2.90)h,P=0.010;(7.07±3.18)h 比(8.09±3.11)h,P=0.028]。两组自然分娩率差异无统计学意义,但观察组 24h 内分娩率显著高于对照组[79.79%比 55.91%,P<0.05]。对于初始 Bishop 评分≤3 的患者,观察组改良评分显著增加,第一产程和总产程时间显著短于对照组(均 P<0.05),而初始 Bishop 评分 4-6 的患者则无此差异。

结论

改良 CCRB 应用可促进宫颈成熟,缩短产程时间,尤其对宫颈成熟度较差的患者,可提高 24h 内分娩率。

试验注册

回顾性注册,ChiCTR2200058270,于 2022 年 4 月 4 日注册。

https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/dc29/9526905/d2c93448037c/12884_2022_5035_Fig4_HTML.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/dc29/9526905/581bf5422a9d/12884_2022_5035_Fig1_HTML.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/dc29/9526905/bb7fcfbb93ce/12884_2022_5035_Fig2_HTML.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/dc29/9526905/94219a37852b/12884_2022_5035_Fig3_HTML.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/dc29/9526905/d2c93448037c/12884_2022_5035_Fig4_HTML.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/dc29/9526905/581bf5422a9d/12884_2022_5035_Fig1_HTML.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/dc29/9526905/bb7fcfbb93ce/12884_2022_5035_Fig2_HTML.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/dc29/9526905/94219a37852b/12884_2022_5035_Fig3_HTML.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/dc29/9526905/d2c93448037c/12884_2022_5035_Fig4_HTML.jpg

相似文献

1
Conventional versus modified application of COOK Cervical Ripening Balloon for induction of labor at term: a randomized controlled trial.常规与改良 COOK 宫颈扩张球囊用于足月引产的随机对照试验。
BMC Pregnancy Childbirth. 2022 Oct 2;22(1):739. doi: 10.1186/s12884-022-05035-w.
2
Comparison of the Cook vaginal cervical ripening balloon with prostaglandin E2 insert for induction of labor in late pregnancy.比较 Cook 阴道宫颈成熟球囊与前列腺素 E2 栓用于晚期妊娠引产。
Arch Gynecol Obstet. 2020 Sep;302(3):579-584. doi: 10.1007/s00404-020-05597-0. Epub 2020 Jul 2.
3
Cervical dilation balloon combined with intravenous drip of oxytocin for induction of term labor: a multicenter clinical trial.宫颈扩张球囊联合静脉滴注缩宫素用于足月引产:一项多中心临床试验。
Arch Gynecol Obstet. 2018 Jan;297(1):77-83. doi: 10.1007/s00404-017-4564-9. Epub 2017 Oct 17.
4
Use of the Foley catheter versus a double balloon cervical ripening catheter in pre-induction cervical ripening in postdate primigravidae.在过期初产妇引产术前宫颈成熟过程中使用Foley导管与双球囊宫颈成熟导管的比较。
J Obstet Gynaecol Res. 2016 Nov;42(11):1489-1494. doi: 10.1111/jog.13086. Epub 2016 Jul 19.
5
[Double-balloon catheter compared to vaginal dinoprostone for cervical ripening in obese women at term].[足月肥胖女性宫颈成熟:双球囊导管与阴道用米索前列醇的比较]
Gynecol Obstet Fertil Senol. 2017 Oct;45(10):521-527. doi: 10.1016/j.gofs.2017.06.012. Epub 2017 Jul 27.
6
Cervical ripening balloon with and without oxytocin in multiparas: a randomized controlled trial.多产妇中使用和不使用催产素的宫颈成熟球囊:一项随机对照试验。
Am J Obstet Gynecol. 2018 Sep;219(3):294.e1-294.e6. doi: 10.1016/j.ajog.2018.05.009. Epub 2018 May 12.
7
Randomized comparison of misoprostol and dinoprostone for preinduction cervical ripening and labor induction.米索前列醇与地诺前列酮用于引产术前宫颈成熟和引产的随机对照比较。
J Formos Med Assoc. 1997 May;96(5):366-9.
8
[Evaluation of the efficacy and safety of Foley catheter pre-induction of labor].[ Foley 导尿管引产的有效性和安全性评估]
Ginekol Pol. 2013 Mar;84(3):180-5. doi: 10.17772/gp/1560.
9
Mifepristone vs balloon catheter for labor induction in previous cesarean: a randomized controlled trial.米非司酮与球囊导管用于既往剖宫产术后引产的比较:一项随机对照试验
Arch Gynecol Obstet. 2017 Aug;296(2):241-248. doi: 10.1007/s00404-017-4431-8. Epub 2017 Jun 17.
10
Balloon catheter vs oxytocin alone for induction of labor in women with a previous cesarean section: A randomized controlled trial.球囊导管与单独使用催产素用于有剖宫产史妇女引产的比较:一项随机对照试验。
Acta Obstet Gynecol Scand. 2020 Feb;99(2):259-266. doi: 10.1111/aogs.13712. Epub 2019 Sep 6.

引用本文的文献

1
Postpartum indicators of stress injury and inflammatory factors in high-risk pregnancies by oxytocin combined with cervical balloon dilators.缩宫素联合宫颈球囊扩张器对高危妊娠产后应激损伤及炎症因子指标的影响
Clinics (Sao Paulo). 2025 Jul 10;80:100668. doi: 10.1016/j.clinsp.2025.100668.
2
Double balloon catheter induction of labor in pregnant women with COVID-19 infection.COVID-19感染孕妇的双球囊导管引产
BMC Pregnancy Childbirth. 2025 Mar 15;25(1):287. doi: 10.1186/s12884-025-07388-4.
3
Effect of cervical Bishop score on induction of labor at term in primiparas using Foley catheter balloon: a retrospective study.

本文引用的文献

1
Multicentre randomised controlled trial comparing the safety in the first 12 h, efficacy and maternal satisfaction of a double balloon catheter and prostaglandin pessary for induction of labour.多中心随机对照试验比较双球囊导管和前列腺素栓在诱导分娩的前 12 小时内的安全性、疗效和产妇满意度。
Arch Gynecol Obstet. 2022 Jan;305(1):11-18. doi: 10.1007/s00404-021-06090-y. Epub 2021 May 11.
2
Induction of labour in mid-trimester pregnancy using double-balloon catheter placement within 12 h versus within 12-24 h.在妊娠中期使用双球囊导管在 12 小时内与在 12-24 小时内放置诱导分娩。
BMC Pregnancy Childbirth. 2021 Jan 6;21(1):17. doi: 10.1186/s12884-020-03513-7.
3
足月产妇应用 Foley 导管球囊行引产时宫颈 Bishop 评分的影响:一项回顾性研究。
BMC Pregnancy Childbirth. 2024 May 31;24(1):401. doi: 10.1186/s12884-024-06600-1.
Effectiveness of Dinoprostone and Cook's Balloon for Labor Induction in Primipara Women at Term.
足月初产妇应用地诺前列酮与库克导尿管促宫颈成熟引产的效果。
Curr Med Sci. 2020 Oct;40(5):951-959. doi: 10.1007/s11596-020-2274-1. Epub 2020 Oct 29.
4
Elective Labor Induction at 39 Weeks of Gestation Compared With Expectant Management: Factors Associated With Adverse Outcomes in Low-Risk Nulliparous Women.选择性 39 孕周分娩与期待管理比较:低风险初产妇不良结局相关因素。
Obstet Gynecol. 2020 Oct;136(4):692-697. doi: 10.1097/AOG.0000000000004055.
5
Comparison of the Cook vaginal cervical ripening balloon with prostaglandin E2 insert for induction of labor in late pregnancy.比较 Cook 阴道宫颈成熟球囊与前列腺素 E2 栓用于晚期妊娠引产。
Arch Gynecol Obstet. 2020 Sep;302(3):579-584. doi: 10.1007/s00404-020-05597-0. Epub 2020 Jul 2.
6
Predicting the duration of induction of labour in nulliparous women.预测初产妇引产的持续时间。
J Obstet Gynaecol. 2020 Feb;40(2):167-170. doi: 10.1080/01443615.2019.1606173. Epub 2019 Jul 25.
7
Maternal and newborn outcomes with elective induction of labor at term.足月选择性引产的母婴结局。
Am J Obstet Gynecol. 2019 Mar;220(3):273.e1-273.e11. doi: 10.1016/j.ajog.2019.01.223. Epub 2019 Feb 17.
8
Double-balloon catheter versus dinoprostone insert for labour induction: a meta-analysis.双球囊导管与地诺前列酮栓用于引产的比较:一项荟萃分析。
Arch Gynecol Obstet. 2019 Jan;299(1):7-12. doi: 10.1007/s00404-018-4929-8. Epub 2018 Oct 12.
9
Patient satisfaction with the cervical ripening balloon as a method for induction of labour: a randomised controlled trial.患者对宫颈成熟球囊作为引产方法的满意度:一项随机对照试验。
Singapore Med J. 2018 Aug;59(8):419-424. doi: 10.11622/smedj.2018097.
10
Increased single-balloon Foley catheter volume for induction of labor and time to delivery: a systematic review and meta-analysis.增加单球囊 Foley 导管容量以诱导分娩和分娩时间:系统评价和荟萃分析。
Acta Obstet Gynecol Scand. 2018 Sep;97(9):1051-1060. doi: 10.1111/aogs.13353. Epub 2018 Apr 25.