Suppr超能文献

不同年龄段人群模拟长时间工作后的血液动力学反应。

Haemodynamic responses to simulated long working hours in different age groups.

机构信息

Research Center for Overwork-related Disorders, National Institute of Occupational Safety and Health, Kawasaki, Japan

Research Center for Overwork-related Disorders, National Institute of Occupational Safety and Health, Kawasaki, Japan.

出版信息

Occup Environ Med. 2019 Oct;76(10):754-757. doi: 10.1136/oemed-2019-105915. Epub 2019 Jul 24.

Abstract

OBJECTIVES

This study aimed to clarify haemodynamic responses of different age groups to simulated long working hours.

METHODS

Men of three age groups participated in this study (16 in their 30s (mean 33.9±2.7 years old), 15 in their 40s (45.5±2.9) and 16 in their 50s (54.1±2.7)). All participants conducted 12 45-min personal computer-based tasks from 09:00 to 22:00. Nine 10-min to 15-min breaks between task periods, a 1-hour break at noon, and a 50-min break in the evening were provided. Haemodynamic responses were measured during task periods. All participants had normal resting systolic blood pressure (SBP <140 mm Hg) and diastolic blood pressure (DBP<90 mm Hg), which were measured before tasks started in the morning. Two-way repeated-measures analysis of variances and multiple comparisons (Bonferroni) were conducted.

RESULTS

No haemodynamic indices were significantly different among groups at baseline. Compared with baseline, SBP was almost unchanged for the 30s group but increased for the 40s and 50s groups during task periods. The 50s group showed higher SBP compared with the 30s group especially in the latter half of the working hours (p<0.05). In addition, the 50s group also showed higher total peripheral resistance (TPR) than the 30s group (p<0.1).

CONCLUSION

The 50s group showed higher SBP and TPR responses than the 30s group, especially in the latter half of working hours. These results suggest that older workers might suffer more cardiovascular damage related to long working hours.

摘要

目的

本研究旨在阐明不同年龄组对模拟长时间工作的血液动力学反应。

方法

三组年龄的男性(30 多岁 16 人,平均年龄 33.9±2.7 岁;40 多岁 15 人,平均年龄 45.5±2.9 岁;50 多岁 16 人,平均年龄 54.1±2.7 岁)参加了这项研究。所有参与者从 09:00 到 22:00 进行 12 个 45 分钟的个人计算机任务。在任务期间,每 10-15 分钟休息一次,中午休息 1 小时,晚上休息 50 分钟。在任务期间测量血液动力学反应。所有参与者静息收缩压(SBP<140mmHg)和舒张压(DBP<90mmHg)正常,均在早晨开始任务前测量。进行了双向重复测量方差分析和多重比较(Bonferroni)。

结果

各组在基线时的血液动力学指标没有显著差异。与基线相比,30 多岁组的 SBP 几乎不变,但 40 多岁和 50 多岁组在任务期间增加。与 30 多岁组相比,50 多岁组在工作时间的后半段 SBP 更高(p<0.05)。此外,50 多岁组的总外周阻力(TPR)也高于 30 多岁组(p<0.1)。

结论

与 30 多岁组相比,50 多岁组的 SBP 和 TPR 反应更高,尤其是在工作时间的后半段。这些结果表明,年长的工人可能会因长时间工作而遭受更多与心血管有关的损害。

相似文献

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验