Centre for the Assessment of Natural Hazards and Proactive Planning & Laboratory of Reclamation Works and Water Resources Management, School of Rural and Surveying Engineering, National Technical University οf Athens, 9 Iroon Polytechniou St., Zografou, 157 80, Athens, Greece.
Laboratory of Ecological Engineering and Technology, Department of Environmental Engineering, School of Engineering, Democritus University of Thrace, 67100, Xanthi, Greece.
Environ Monit Assess. 2019 Jul 24;191(8):505. doi: 10.1007/s10661-019-7652-4.
The comparative performance of seven widely used Water Quality Indices (WQIs) is evaluated in a fluvial water body. The computation of the individual WQIs was based on bi-weekly measurements of eleven water quality parameters in Vosvozis River situated in Rhodope Prefecture, North Greece. The sampling campaign lasted 16 months (from August 2005 to November 2006), and over this period, the individual parameters were measured at three gauging stations along the river. The indices which were applied were the Prati's Index of Pollution, Bhargava's Index, Oregon WQI, National Sanitation Foundation (NSF) WQI, Canadian Council of Ministers of Environment (CCME) WQI, Dinius' Second Index, and the Weighted Arithmetic WQI. Apart from the computation of the above WQIs and the subsequent qualitative classification of the water body, the most important quality parameters per methodology were determined through the calculation of the correlation coefficient between each water quality parameter and the final WQI value. The results showed that Bhargava's Index along with NSF WQI tend to classify water bodies into superior quality classes, Prati's Index into slightly lower categories, whereas Oregon and CCME WQIs were found to be relatively "stricter," giving results ranging between the lowest classes of the qualitative ranking. These findings confirm those emerged by our previous studies while they are also partially in line with similar studies comparing a smaller number of indices. CCME WQI is suggested as the most appropriate, among the examined indices, since it is both "conservative" and adequately "sensitive" to reflect changes in water quality.
在一条河流中评估了七种常用水质指数(WQIs)的比较性能。个体 WQI 的计算基于北希腊罗多彼州沃斯沃齐斯河 11 个水质参数的双周测量。采样活动持续了 16 个月(从 2005 年 8 月到 2006 年 11 月),在此期间,个体参数在河流的三个测量站进行了测量。应用的指数有 Prati 的污染指数、Bhargava 的指数、俄勒冈 WQI、国家卫生基金会(NSF)WQI、加拿大部长理事会环境(CCME)WQI、Dinius 的第二指数和加权算术 WQI。除了计算上述 WQIs 和随后对水体进行定性分类外,还通过计算每个水质参数与最终 WQI 值之间的相关系数,确定每种方法的最重要质量参数。结果表明,Bhargava 的指数和 NSF WQI 倾向于将水体分类为优质类别,Prati 的指数为略低类别,而俄勒冈和 CCME WQIs 则被认为相对“更严格”,结果介于定性排名的最低类别之间。这些发现证实了我们之前的研究结果,同时也与比较少数指数的类似研究部分一致。CCME WQI 被建议作为最适合的指数,因为它既“保守”又对水质变化具有足够的“敏感性”。