• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

将绘图作为一种编码策略的益处(及成本)。

The benefit (and cost) of drawing as an encoding strategy.

作者信息

Meade Melissa E, Klein Michael D, Fernandes Myra A

机构信息

Department of Psychology, University of Waterloo, Waterloo, ON, Canada.

出版信息

Q J Exp Psychol (Hove). 2020 Feb;73(2):199-210. doi: 10.1177/1747021819869188. Epub 2019 Aug 17.

DOI:10.1177/1747021819869188
PMID:31342856
Abstract

Drawing, as an encoding strategy for to-be-remembered words, has previously been shown to provide robust memory benefits. In the current study, we investigated the effect of drawing on false memory endorsements during a recognition test. We found that while drawing led to higher hit rates relative to writing (Experiment 1) and creating visual mental imagery (Experiment 2), it also led to higher false alarm (FA) rates to critical lures in a variant of the Deese-Roediger-McDermott (DRM) paradigm. When compared with an encoding strategy requiring listing of object features (Experiment 3), drawing led to a lower FA rate. We suggest that drawing enhances memory by promoting recollection of rich visual contextual information during retrieval, and this leads to the unintended side effect of increasing FA rates to related information.

摘要

绘图作为一种用于记忆单词的编码策略,此前已被证明能带来强大的记忆益处。在当前的研究中,我们调查了绘图在识别测试中对错误记忆认可的影响。我们发现,虽然相对于书写(实验1)和创建视觉心理意象(实验2),绘图导致了更高的命中率,但在Deese-Roediger-McDermott(DRM)范式的一个变体中,它也导致了对关键诱饵的更高误报(FA)率。与要求列出物体特征的编码策略(实验3)相比,绘图导致了更低的误报率。我们认为,绘图通过在检索过程中促进对丰富视觉背景信息的回忆来增强记忆,而这会导致对相关信息的误报率增加这一意外的副作用。

相似文献

1
The benefit (and cost) of drawing as an encoding strategy.将绘图作为一种编码策略的益处(及成本)。
Q J Exp Psychol (Hove). 2020 Feb;73(2):199-210. doi: 10.1177/1747021819869188. Epub 2019 Aug 17.
2
Creating a recollection-based memory through drawing.通过绘画创建基于回忆的记忆。
J Exp Psychol Learn Mem Cogn. 2018 May;44(5):734-751. doi: 10.1037/xlm0000445. Epub 2017 Nov 2.
3
Drawing pictures at encoding enhances memory in healthy older adults and in individuals with probable dementia.在编码时画画可增强健康老年人和疑似痴呆症患者的记忆力。
Neuropsychol Dev Cogn B Aging Neuropsychol Cogn. 2020 Nov;27(6):880-901. doi: 10.1080/13825585.2019.1700899. Epub 2019 Dec 13.
4
Eye-closure & the retrieval of item-specific information in recognition memory.眼闭合与再认记忆中项目特异性信息的提取。
Conscious Cogn. 2020 Jan;77:102858. doi: 10.1016/j.concog.2019.102858. Epub 2019 Dec 11.
5
Drawing individual images benefits recognition accuracy in the Deese-Roediger-McDermott paradigm.抽取单个图片有益于德西-罗德里格-麦克德莫特范式中的识别准确性。
Q J Exp Psychol (Hove). 2022 Aug;75(8):1571-1582. doi: 10.1177/17470218211056498. Epub 2021 Nov 10.
6
The drawing effect: Evidence for reliable and robust memory benefits in free recall.绘图效应:自由回忆中可靠且强大的记忆益处的证据。
Q J Exp Psychol (Hove). 2016;69(9):1752-76. doi: 10.1080/17470218.2015.1094494. Epub 2016 Feb 16.
7
"Identify-to-reject": a specific strategy to avoid false memories in the DRM paradigm.“识别拒绝”:一种在 DRM 范式中避免错误记忆的特定策略。
Mem Cognit. 2012 Feb;40(2):252-65. doi: 10.3758/s13421-011-0152-6.
8
Working memory differences in illusory recollection of critical lures.虚假关联记忆中工作记忆的差异
Mem Cognit. 2013 Jul;41(5):716-25. doi: 10.3758/s13421-013-0293-x.
9
Comparing the influence of doodling, drawing, and writing at encoding on memory.比较编码时涂鸦、绘画和书写对记忆的影响。
Can J Exp Psychol. 2019 Mar;73(1):28-36. doi: 10.1037/cep0000170.
10
The drawing effect: Evidence for costs and benefits using pure and mixed lists.绘图效应:使用纯列表和混合列表的成本和收益证据。
Mem Cognit. 2024 Aug;52(6):1408-1421. doi: 10.3758/s13421-024-01551-6. Epub 2024 Mar 22.

引用本文的文献

1
Reactivity from judgments of learning is not only due to memory forecasting: evidence from associative memory and frequency judgments.学习判断中的反应性不仅源于记忆预测:来自联想记忆和频率判断的证据。
Metacogn Learn. 2022;17(2):589-625. doi: 10.1007/s11409-022-09301-2. Epub 2022 Apr 29.