Centro de Investigación Apícola y Agroambiental (CIAPA), Instituto Regional de Investigación y Desarrollo Agroalimentario y Forestal (IRIAF), Honey Bee Pathology Laboratory, Marchamalo, Guadalajara, Spain.
Department of Veterinary Medicine and Surgery, Faculty of Veterinary Medicine, Universidad Complutense de Madrid, Madrid, Spain.
Vet Pathol. 2020 Jan;57(1):132-138. doi: 10.1177/0300985819864302. Epub 2019 Jul 25.
The microsporidia and are major honey bee pathogens that possess different characteristics in terms of the signs they produce, as well as disease development and transmission. Although the ventricular epithelium is generally considered the target tissue, indirect observations led to speculation that may also target other structures, possibly explaining at least some of the differences between these 2 species. To investigate the tropism of for honey bee tissues, we performed controlled laboratory infections by orally administering doses of 50 000 or 100 000 fresh mature spores of either species. The fat body was isolated from the infected bees, as well as organs from the digestive (esophagus, ventriculus, ileum, rectum), excretory (Malpighian tubules), circulatory (aorta, heart), respiratory (thoracic tracheas), exocrine (hypopharyngeal, mandibular and labial, cephalic, thoracic salivary glands), and sensory/nervous (brain, eyes and associated nerve structures, thoracic nerve ganglia) systems. Tissues were examined by light and electron microscopy at 7, 10, and 15 days postinfection. Both species were found to infect epithelial cells and clusters of regenerative cells in the ventriculus, and while the ileum and rectum contained spores of the microsporidia in the lumen, these structures did not show overt lesions. No stages of the parasites or cellular lesions were detected in the other organs tested, confirming the high tropism of both species for the ventricular epithelium cells. Thus, these direct histopathological observations indicate that neither of these 2 species exhibit tropism for honey bee organs other than the ventriculus.
微孢子虫和是主要的蜜蜂病原体,它们在产生的症状、疾病发展和传播方式上具有不同的特征。尽管心室上皮通常被认为是靶组织,但间接观察导致人们猜测可能也针对其他结构,这可能至少部分解释了这两种 之间的一些差异。为了研究对蜜蜂组织的趋向性,我们通过口服给予 50,000 或 100,000 个新鲜成熟孢子,对这两个物种进行了受控的实验室感染。从感染蜜蜂中分离出脂肪体,以及来自消化(食管、心室、回肠、直肠)、排泄(马氏管)、循环(大动脉、心脏)、呼吸(胸部气管)、外分泌(咽、下颌和唇、头)、感觉/神经(脑、眼和相关神经结构、胸部神经节)系统的器官。在感染后 7、10 和 15 天,通过光镜和电子显微镜检查组织。两种 都被发现感染了心室中的上皮细胞和再生细胞簇,而回肠和直肠中的腔内容纳了微孢子虫的孢子,但这些结构没有明显的病变。在测试的其他器官中未检测到寄生虫的阶段或细胞病变,这证实了这两个物种对心室上皮细胞的高度趋向性。因此,这些直接组织病理学观察表明,这两种 都不表现出对除心室以外的蜜蜂器官的趋向性。