Calhoun Cardiology Center.
Department of Psychology.
Psychol Addict Behav. 2020 Feb;34(1):128-135. doi: 10.1037/adb0000494. Epub 2019 Jul 25.
Lesbian, gay, and bisexual (LGB) individuals have elevated rates of substance use disorders and present to treatment with more severe substance use problems. Despite this health disparity, recent reviews highlight the paucity of studies reporting sexual orientation in substance use research (e.g., Flentje, Bacca, & Cochran, 2015). Using data from 5 clinical trials of contingency management (CM), the current study investigated the impact of sexual orientation on 3 substance use outcomes: treatment retention, longest duration of abstinence, and percent negative samples submitted. Participants (N = 912; mean age = 36.6 years; 51.1% female; 45% African American, 42.2% Caucasian) were randomized to standard care in community-based intensive outpatient treatment (IOP) or the same plus CM. Patients identifying as LGB made up 10.6% of the sample. A significant proportion identified as bisexual (8.2% of the total sample). Regardless of sexual orientation, participants receiving CM achieved better treatment outcomes than those receiving IOP alone. There were no statistically significant differences between LGB and heterosexual participants in their response to IOP in general, and CM specifically, across all 3 treatment outcomes (ps > .05). However, equivalence testing revealed that outcomes were not statistically equivalent for LGB and heterosexual participants, with the exception of percentage of negative samples, which was equivalent within the CM group only. Differences in treatment response to CM and standard community-based IOP do not reach the level of statistical significance; however, in most cases, we cannot conclude that treatment response is equivalent for LGB and heterosexual individuals. (PsycINFO Database Record (c) 2020 APA, all rights reserved).
女同性恋、男同性恋和双性恋(LGB)个体的物质使用障碍发生率较高,并且在接受治疗时存在更严重的物质使用问题。尽管存在这种健康差异,但最近的综述强调了报告物质使用研究中性取向的研究很少(例如,Flentje、Bacca 和 Cochran,2015)。本研究使用来自 5 项基于条件管理(CM)的临床试验的数据,调查了性取向对 3 项物质使用结果的影响:治疗保留率、最长禁欲时间和提交的阴性样本百分比。参与者(N = 912;平均年龄 = 36.6 岁;51.1%为女性;45%为非裔美国人,42.2%为白种人)被随机分配到社区强化门诊治疗(IOP)中的标准护理或相同的标准护理加 CM。10.6%的样本被认定为 LGB。相当一部分人被认定为双性恋(占总样本的 8.2%)。无论性取向如何,接受 CM 的参与者的治疗结果均优于仅接受 IOP 的参与者。在一般的 IOP 和具体的 CM 治疗中,LGB 和异性恋参与者的反应在所有 3 个治疗结果方面(ps >.05)均无统计学差异。然而,等效性检验表明,LGB 和异性恋参与者的结果在统计学上并不等效,除了阴性样本的百分比,仅在 CM 组中等效。对 CM 和基于社区的标准 IOP 的治疗反应的差异没有达到统计学意义;然而,在大多数情况下,我们不能得出结论认为 LGB 和异性恋个体的治疗反应是等效的。(PsycINFO 数据库记录(c)2020 APA,保留所有权利)。