Pfund Rory A, Ginley Meredith K, Boness Cassandra L, Rash Carla J, Zajac Kristyn, Witkiewitz Katie
Center on Alcohol, Substance use, And Addictions, University of New Mexico.
Department of Psychology, East Tennessee State University.
Clin Psychol (New York). 2024 Jun;31(2):136-150. doi: 10.1037/cps0000121. Epub 2022 Nov 10.
Several professional organizations and federal agencies recommend contingency management (CM) as an empirically supported treatment for drug use disorder. However, the release of the "Tolin criteria" warrants an updated recommendation. Using this methodology, five meta-analyses (84 studies, 11,000 participants) were reviewed. Two meta-analyses were rated moderate quality, and three were rated low or critically low quality. Comparator conditions included active treatment, placebo, treatment as usual, and no treatment. The primary outcome was abstinence. Considering only the moderate quality meta-analyses, the effect of CM versus control on posttreatment abstinence was = 0.54 [0.43, 0.64] and follow-up abstinence was =0.08 [0.00, 0.16]. A "strong" recommendation was provided for CM as an empirically supported treatment for drug use disorder.
几个专业组织和联邦机构推荐应急管理(CM)作为药物使用障碍的一种经实证支持的治疗方法。然而,“托林标准”的发布需要更新这一推荐。采用这种方法,对五项荟萃分析(84项研究,11000名参与者)进行了审查。两项荟萃分析被评为中等质量,三项被评为低质量或极低质量。对照条件包括积极治疗、安慰剂、常规治疗和不治疗。主要结果是戒断。仅考虑中等质量的荟萃分析,CM与对照相比对治疗后戒断的效应为=0.54[0.43,0.64],随访戒断效应为=0.08[0.00,0.16]。对应急管理作为药物使用障碍的一种经实证支持的治疗方法给出了“强烈”推荐。