Suppr超能文献

心力衰竭患者及其照护者的预先治疗指令偏好与预先指令知识、态度和障碍/获益相关因素的关联。

Associations of Advance Directive Knowledge, Attitudes, and Barriers/Benefits With Preferences for Advance Treatment Directives Among Patients With Heart Failure and Their Caregivers.

机构信息

Gachon University, College of Nursing, Incheon, Korea.

Division of Cardiology, Department of Internal Medicine, Gil Medical Center, Gachon University, College of Medicine, Incheon, Korea.

出版信息

J Card Fail. 2020 Jan;26(1):61-69. doi: 10.1016/j.cardfail.2019.07.011. Epub 2019 Jul 22.

Abstract

BACKGROUND

Patients with heart failure (HF) have not been considered as major beneficiaries of advance directives (ADs). We analyzed factors affecting the preferences for the adoption of ADs by patients with HF and their caregivers.

METHODS AND RESULTS

Seventy-one patient (mean age: 68 years)-caregiver (mean age: 55 years) dyads were enrolled during clinic visits for routine care at a single institution and completed questionnaires during in-person visits. Cohen's kappa coefficients and generalized estimating equation models were used to analyze the data. The agreement on dyadic perspectives for aggressive treatments was poor or fair, whereas agreement relative to hospice care was moderate (k = 0.42, 95% confidence interval = 0.087-0.754). Both patients and caregivers demonstrated poor knowledge of ADs and similar levels of perceived benefits and barriers to advance care planning. However, the caregivers had more positive attitudes toward ADs than patients. Patients and caregivers who were older and/or males had greater odds of preferring aggressive treatments and/or hospice care. Further, those with depressive symptoms had lower odds of preferring hospice care.

CONCLUSION

The dyadic agreement was moderately high only for hospice care preferences. Both patients and caregivers demonstrated knowledge of shortfalls regarding ADs. Timely AD discussions could increase dyadic agreement and enhance informed and shared decision-making regarding medical care.

摘要

背景

心力衰竭(HF)患者并未被认为是预先指示(AD)的主要受益者。我们分析了影响 HF 患者及其护理人员对 AD 采用偏好的因素。

方法和结果

在一家机构的常规就诊期间,对 71 对患者(平均年龄:68 岁)-护理人员(平均年龄:55 岁)进行了研究,并在面对面访问期间完成了问卷调查。采用 Cohen's kappa 系数和广义估计方程模型来分析数据。在关于积极治疗的对偶观点上,一致性差或一般,而对临终关怀的一致性为中等(k=0.42,95%置信区间=0.087-0.754)。患者和护理人员对 AD 的了解都很差,对预先护理计划的好处和障碍的感知相似。然而,护理人员对 AD 的态度比患者更为积极。年龄较大和/或男性的患者和护理人员更有可能选择积极的治疗方法和/或临终关怀。此外,有抑郁症状的人选择临终关怀的可能性较低。

结论

只有在临终关怀偏好上,对偶协议才具有中等高度的一致性。患者和护理人员都对 AD 的知识存在不足。及时进行 AD 讨论可以增加对偶协议,并增强对医疗护理的知情和共同决策。

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验