Kim Shinmi, Koh Sujin, Park Kwonoh, Kim Jinshil
Department of Nursing,Changwon National University,Changwon,Republic of Korea.
Department of Hematology and Oncology,University of Ulsan College of Medicine, Ulsan University Hospital,Ulsan,Republic of Korea.
Palliat Support Care. 2017 Feb;15(1):77-87. doi: 10.1017/S1478951516000808. Epub 2016 Nov 2.
The Korean advance directive (K-AD) comprises a value statement, treatment directives, preferences for cardiopulmonary resuscitation (CPR), artificial ventilation, tube feeding, and hospice care, as well as a proxy appointment. The K-AD can facilitate a patient's decision making with respect to end-of-life (EoL) care. The present study aimed to examine the extent to which patient-caregiver dyads would use the K-AD and agree on EoL care decisions.
Using a descriptive study design, 81 cancer patients were invited to participate. The final sample consisted of 44 patient-caregiver dyads who completed survey questionnaires, including the K-AD. One patient did not complete all parts of the questionnaire, and 36 (44.4%) declined to participate. Content analysis was conducted to examine the K-AD value statements. Cohen's kappa coefficient was calculated to determine the degree of patient-caregiver dyadic agreement on K-AD treatment directives (Sudore & Fried, 2010).
Our patient participants had the following cancer diagnoses: colorectal 29.5%, breast 29.5%, and liver/biliary tract cancers, 15.9%. Half of the sample had advanced-stage disease. Spouses (70.5%) or adult children (20.4%) were the primary caregivers, with perceived bonding rated as fair (31.8%) or good (65.9%). Rejection of the K-AD was mainly due to the difficulty involved in deciding on EoL care (50%). Comfort while dying was the most common theme expressed by patients (73.8%) and caregivers (66.7%). In terms of treatment directives, dyads advocated for hospice care (66.7%) and reduced support for aggressive treatments of CPR or artificial ventilation. The use of CPR (κ = 0.43, p = 0.004) and artificial ventilation (κ = 0.28, p = 0.046) showed significantly mild to moderate concordance among the dyads. Some 16 of the 21 dyads identified their spouses as a proxy, with others designating their adult children.
The degree of patient-caregiver concordance on the K-AD seemed applicable, and achieved mild to moderate concordance. Our findings are exploratory but suggest the need for EoL discussions where patient-caregiver dyads are encouraged to participate in EoL care decision making.
韩国预立医疗指示(K-AD)包括一份价值观声明、治疗指示、关于心肺复苏(CPR)、人工通气、管饲和临终关怀的偏好,以及指定代理人。K-AD有助于患者做出关于临终(EoL)护理的决策。本研究旨在探讨患者-照顾者二元组使用K-AD并就EoL护理决策达成一致的程度。
采用描述性研究设计,邀请81名癌症患者参与。最终样本包括44对完成调查问卷(包括K-AD)的患者-照顾者二元组。1名患者未完成问卷的所有部分,36名(44.4%)拒绝参与。进行内容分析以检查K-AD价值观声明。计算科恩kappa系数以确定患者-照顾者二元组在K-AD治疗指示上的一致程度(Sudore & Fried,2010)。
我们的患者参与者有以下癌症诊断:结直肠癌29.5%、乳腺癌29.5%、肝/胆道癌15.9%。一半的样本患有晚期疾病。配偶(70.5%)或成年子女(20.4%)是主要照顾者,感知到的情感联系被评为一般(31.8%)或良好(65.9%)。拒绝K-AD主要是由于难以决定EoL护理(50%)。安详离世是患者(73.8%)和照顾者(66.7%)表达的最常见主题。在治疗指示方面,二元组主张临终关怀(66.7%),并减少对CPR或人工通气等积极治疗的支持。CPR(κ = 0.43,p = 0.004)和人工通气(κ = 0.28,p = 0.046)的使用在二元组中显示出显著的轻度至中度一致性。21对二元组中有16对指定其配偶为代理人,其他则指定其成年子女。
患者-照顾者在K-AD上的一致程度似乎是适用的,并达到了轻度至中度的一致性。我们的研究结果具有探索性,但表明需要进行EoL讨论,鼓励患者-照顾者二元组参与EoL护理决策。