Suppr超能文献

随着时间的推移,加拿大人口中阿片类药物(可待因、吗啡或哌替啶)使用模式的变化:对 1994-2011 年全国纵向人口健康调查的分析。

Patterns of opioid use (codeine, morphine or meperidine) in the Canadian population over time: analysis of the Longitudinal National Population Health Survey 1994-2011.

机构信息

Arthritis Program, Krembil Research Institute, University Health Network, Toronto, Ontario, Canada.

Arthritis Community Research and Evaluation Unit, Krembil Research Institute, University Health Network, Toronto, Ontario, Canada.

出版信息

BMJ Open. 2019 Jul 24;9(7):e029613. doi: 10.1136/bmjopen-2019-029613.

Abstract

OBJECTIVE

This study aimed to investigate cohort effects in selected opioids use and determine whether cohort differences were associated with changes in risk factors for use over time.

DESIGN

This study presents secondary analyses of a longitudinal survey panel of the general population that collected data biannually.

SETTING

Data from the Canadian Longitudinal National Population Health Survey 1994-2011.

POPULATION

This study included 12 542 participants from the following birth cohorts: post-World War I (born 1915-1924), pre-World War II (born 1925-1934), World War II (born 1935-1944), Older Baby Boom (born 1945-1954), Younger Baby Boom (born 1955-1964), Older Generation X (born 1965-1974) and Younger Generation X (born 1975-1984).

MAIN OUTCOME

Responses to a single question asking about the use of codeine, morphine or meperidine in the past month (yes/no) were examined.

RESULTS

Over and above age and period effects, there were significant cohort differences in selected opioids use: each succeeding recent cohort had greater use than their predecessors (eg, Gen Xers had greater use than younger baby boomers). Selected opioids use increased significantly from 1994 to 2002, plateauing between 2002 and 2006 and then declining until 2011. After accounting for cohort and period effects, there was a decline in use of these opioids with increasing age. Although pain was significantly associated with greater selected opioids use (OR=3.63, 95% CI 3.39 to 3.94), pain did not explain cohort differences. Cohort and period effects were no longer significant after adjusting for the number of chronic conditions. Cohort differences in selected opioids use mirrored cohort differences in multimorbidity. Use of these opioids was significantly associated with taking antidepressants or tranquillisers (OR=2.52, 95% CI 2.27 to 2.81 and OR=1.60, 95% CI 1.46 to 1.75, respectively).

CONCLUSIONS

The findings underscore the need to consider multimorbidity including possible psychological disorders and associated medications when prescribing opioids (codeine, morphine, meperidine), particularly for recent birth cohorts. Continued efforts to monitor prescription patterns and develop specific opioid use guidelines for multimorbidity appear warranted.

摘要

目的

本研究旨在探讨选定阿片类药物使用中的队列效应,并确定队列差异是否与随时间推移使用风险因素的变化有关。

设计

本研究是对一般人群纵向调查面板的二次分析,该面板每两年收集一次数据。

地点

加拿大 1994-2011 年全国人口健康纵向调查的数据。

人群

本研究包括以下出生队列的 12542 名参与者:一战后(1915-1924 年出生)、二战前(1925-1934 年出生)、二战期间(1935-1944 年出生)、老婴儿潮一代(1945-1954 年出生)、年轻婴儿潮一代(1955-1964 年出生)、老 X 一代(1965-1974 年出生)和年轻 X 一代(1975-1984 年出生)。

主要结果

检查了过去一个月内使用可待因、吗啡或哌替啶的单一问题(是/否)的回答。

结果

除年龄和时期效应外,在选定的阿片类药物使用方面还存在显著的队列差异:每个最近的队列使用量都大于其前辈(例如,X 世代的使用量大于年轻的婴儿潮一代)。从 1994 年到 2002 年,选定的阿片类药物使用量显著增加,在 2002 年至 2006 年期间达到峰值,然后下降,直到 2011 年。在考虑了队列和时期效应后,随着年龄的增长,这些阿片类药物的使用量有所下降。尽管疼痛与更大剂量的选定阿片类药物使用显著相关(OR=3.63,95%CI 3.39-3.94),但疼痛并不能解释队列差异。在调整慢性疾病数量后,队列和时期效应不再显著。选定阿片类药物使用中的队列差异反映了多种合并症的队列差异。这些阿片类药物的使用与服用抗抑郁药或镇静剂显著相关(OR=2.52,95%CI 2.27-2.81 和 OR=1.60,95%CI 1.46-1.75)。

结论

研究结果强调了在开具阿片类药物(可待因、吗啡、哌替啶)处方时,特别是为最近的出生队列,需要考虑多种合并症,包括可能的心理障碍和相关药物。似乎有必要继续努力监测处方模式并为多种合并症制定特定的阿片类药物使用指南。

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验