Suppr超能文献

腹腔镜单孔手术(LESS)与传统多孔腹腔镜手术(CMPL)行子宫切除术的比较:腹部切口瘢痕的长期结局

Comparison of laparoendoscopic single-site (LESS) surgery and conventional multiport laparoscopic (CMPL) surgery for hysterectomy: long-term outcomes of abdominal incisional scar.

作者信息

Demirayak Gökhan, Özdemir İsa Aykut, Comba Cihan, Aslan Çetin Berna, Aydogan Mathyk Begüm, Yıldız Mustafa, Mihmanlı Veli, Karaca İbrahim, Öztürk Mustafa, Güralp Onur

机构信息

Department of Gynecologic Oncology, Health Sciences University, Bakırköy Dr Sadi Konuk Education and Research Hospital, Istanbul, Turkey.

Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, Health Sciences University, Kanuni Sultan Suleyman Education and Research Hospital, Istanbul, Turkey.

出版信息

J Obstet Gynaecol. 2020 Feb;40(2):217-221. doi: 10.1080/01443615.2019.1606183. Epub 2019 Jul 26.

Abstract

There is scarcity of data about the long-term results such as port-site hernia, body image scale and cosmesis scale outcomes between laparoendoscopic single-site (LESS) surgery and conventional multiport laparoscopy (CMPL) for hysterectomy. Eighty women, who underwent total hysterectomy by the LESS ( = 40) and CMPL ( = 40) technique due to benign and malign gynecological disorders, were evaluated with a cosmesis and body image questionnaire in an age-matched cohort study.Median follow-up time was 25 (6-30) months in both groups. The mean age of the patients was 49.3 ± 6.3 years. The mean body image scale scores were 5.3 ± 0.6 and 5.5 ± 1.2 in the LESS and CMPL groups, respectively ( = 0.268). The mean cosmesis and scar scale scores were significantly higher in the LESS group compared to the CMPL group ( = .011 and  < .001, respectively). Port-site hernia was detected in two patients in the LESS group, but not in the CMPL group. There was no cuff dehiscence in the LESS nor in the CMPL group. The LESS technique provides better cosmesis when compared with the CMPL technique. The body image perceptions in the two groups were similar. Women who wish to undergo the LESS surgery should be informed about the risk of incisional hernia.Impact statement Short-term results of LESS hysterectomy such as complication rates, additional port requirement, conversion to CMPL or laparotomy, pain score and analgesic use were evaluated in various studies. Several studies have been published on the safety and efficacy of single-port laparoscopic hysterectomy (LH); however, it has been unclear whether single-port LH offers benefits over multiport LH regarding long-term patient satisfaction and cosmetic satisfaction. In this prospective cohort study, we aimed to compare long-term results (at least six months) of abdominal incisional scar between LESS and CMPL surgery for hysterectomy. The LESS technique provides better cosmesis when compared with the CMPL technique, although, the body image perceptions in the two groups were similar. LESS technique can be offered as an option for hysterectomy since it provides better long-term cosmesis compared to CMPL.

摘要

关于腹腔镜单孔手术(LESS)与传统多孔腹腔镜手术(CMPL)子宫切除术的长期结果,如切口疝、身体形象量表和美容量表结果的数据较少。在一项年龄匹配的队列研究中,对80名因良性和恶性妇科疾病分别接受LESS(n = 40)和CMPL(n = 40)技术全子宫切除术的女性进行了美容和身体形象问卷调查。两组的中位随访时间均为25(6 - 30)个月。患者的平均年龄为49.3±6.3岁。LESS组和CMPL组的平均身体形象量表得分分别为5.3±0.6和5.5±1.2(P = 0.268)。LESS组的平均美容和瘢痕量表得分显著高于CMPL组(分别为P = 0.011和P < 0.001)。LESS组有2例患者发生切口疝,而CMPL组未发生。LESS组和CMPL组均未出现袖口裂开。与CMPL技术相比,LESS技术具有更好的美容效果。两组的身体形象认知相似。希望接受LESS手术的女性应被告知切口疝风险。影响声明 在各项研究中评估了LESS子宫切除术的短期结果,如并发症发生率、额外端口需求、转为CMPL或开腹手术、疼痛评分和镇痛药物使用情况。关于单孔腹腔镜子宫切除术(LH)的安全性和有效性已经发表了多项研究;然而,单孔LH在长期患者满意度和美容满意度方面是否优于多孔LH尚不清楚。在这项前瞻性队列研究中,我们旨在比较LESS和CMPL子宫切除术腹部切口瘢痕的长期结果(至少6个月)。与CMPL技术相比,LESS技术具有更好的美容效果,尽管两组的身体形象认知相似。由于与CMPL相比,LESS技术提供了更好的长期美容效果,因此可以作为子宫切除术的一种选择。

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验