• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

相似文献

1
Long-term Experience of Single-port and Multi-port Total Laparoscopic Hysterectomy in a Single Center.单孔与多孔全腹腔镜子宫切除术在单中心的长期经验。
In Vivo. 2022 Sep-Oct;36(5):2409-2413. doi: 10.21873/invivo.12974.
2
Abdominal, multi-port and single-port total laparoscopic hysterectomy: eleven-year trends comparison of surgical outcomes complications of 936 cases.腹部、多端口与单端口全腹腔镜子宫切除术:936例手术结果及并发症的11年趋势比较
Arch Gynecol Obstet. 2015 Jun;291(6):1313-9. doi: 10.1007/s00404-014-3576-y. Epub 2014 Dec 9.
3
Operative outcomes of single-port-access laparoscopy-assisted vaginal hysterectomy compared with single-port-access total laparoscopic hysterectomy.经单孔腹腔镜辅助阴道子宫切除术与经单孔腹腔镜全子宫切除术的手术效果比较。
Taiwan J Obstet Gynecol. 2014 Dec;53(4):486-9. doi: 10.1016/j.tjog.2013.07.003.
4
A comparison of postoperative pain after transumbilical single-port access and conventional three-port total laparoscopic hysterectomy: a randomized controlled trial.经脐单孔入路与传统三孔全腹腔镜子宫切除术后疼痛的比较:一项随机对照试验
Acta Obstet Gynecol Scand. 2015 Dec;94(12):1290-6. doi: 10.1111/aogs.12767. Epub 2015 Sep 28.
5
Overcoming the learning curve of single-port total laparoscopic hysterectomy with barbed suture: a single surgeon's initial experience.使用倒刺缝线克服单孔全腹腔镜子宫切除术的学习曲线:一位外科医生的初步经验。
Wideochir Inne Tech Maloinwazyjne. 2017 Sep;12(3):264-270. doi: 10.5114/wiitm.2017.68106. Epub 2017 May 30.
6
Laparoscopic supracervical hysterectomy (LSH) versus total laparoscopic hysterectomy (TLH): an implementation study in 1,952 patients with an analysis of risk factors for conversion to laparotomy and complications, and of procedure-specific re-operations.腹腔镜下子宫次全切除术(LSH)与全腹腔镜子宫切除术(TLH):1952 例患者的实施研究,分析中转开腹的风险因素和并发症,以及手术特异性再次手术。
Arch Gynecol Obstet. 2013 Dec;288(6):1329-39. doi: 10.1007/s00404-013-2921-x. Epub 2013 Jun 18.
7
Single-port access total laparoscopic hysterectomy with Korean-made OCTO Port: Turkish surgeons' initial experience.使用韩国产OCTO Port的单孔通道全腹腔镜子宫切除术:土耳其外科医生的初步经验。
J Obstet Gynaecol. 2016;36(1):114-8. doi: 10.3109/01443615.2015.1041885. Epub 2015 Sep 25.
8
Transumbilical single-port access versus conventional total laparoscopic hysterectomy: surgical outcomes.经脐单孔与传统腹腔镜子宫切除术:手术结局比较。
Am J Obstet Gynecol. 2010 Jul;203(1):26.e1-6. doi: 10.1016/j.ajog.2010.02.026. Epub 2010 Apr 24.
9
Comparison of surgical outcomes between robot-assisted laparoscopic hysterectomy and conventional total laparoscopic hysterectomy in gynecologic benign disease: a single-center cohort study.机器人辅助腹腔镜子宫切除术与传统全腹腔镜子宫切除术治疗妇科良性疾病的手术效果比较:一项单中心队列研究
J Robot Surg. 2023 Oct;17(5):2221-2228. doi: 10.1007/s11701-023-01638-3. Epub 2023 Jun 6.
10
Feasibility and Surgical Outcomes of Hybrid Robotic Single-Site Hysterectomy Compared with Single-Port Access Total Laparoscopic Hysterectomy.杂交机器人单孔子宫切除术与单端口全腹腔镜子宫切除术的可行性及手术结果比较
J Pers Med. 2023 Jul 24;13(7):1178. doi: 10.3390/jpm13071178.

引用本文的文献

1
Comparison of barbed suture and conventional suture in laparoendoscopic single-site myomectomy.倒刺缝线与传统缝线在腹腔镜单孔子宫肌瘤剔除术中的比较
Front Oncol. 2025 May 1;15:1541002. doi: 10.3389/fonc.2025.1541002. eCollection 2025.
2
Postoperative abdominopelvic adhesion and umbilical wound validation after single-port laparoscopy or two-port laparoscopy for gynecological surgery: a comparison with conventional laparoscopy.单孔腹腔镜或两孔腹腔镜妇科手术后腹腔盆腔粘连及脐部伤口验证:与传统腹腔镜的比较
Arch Gynecol Obstet. 2025 Jun;311(6):1599-1607. doi: 10.1007/s00404-025-07951-6. Epub 2025 Jan 30.

本文引用的文献

1
Comparison of laparoendoscopic single-site (LESS) surgery and conventional multiport laparoscopic (CMPL) surgery for hysterectomy: long-term outcomes of abdominal incisional scar.腹腔镜单孔手术(LESS)与传统多孔腹腔镜手术(CMPL)行子宫切除术的比较:腹部切口瘢痕的长期结局
J Obstet Gynaecol. 2020 Feb;40(2):217-221. doi: 10.1080/01443615.2019.1606183. Epub 2019 Jul 26.
2
Laparoendoscopic single-site surgery versus conventional laparoscopy for hysterectomy: a systematic review and meta-analysis.腹腔镜单孔手术与传统腹腔镜手术治疗子宫切除术的系统评价和荟萃分析
Arch Gynecol Obstet. 2017 May;295(5):1089-1103. doi: 10.1007/s00404-017-4323-y. Epub 2017 Mar 29.
3
Single-Port vs Multiport Laparoscopic Hysterectomy: A Meta-Analysis of Randomized Controlled Trials.单孔与多孔腹腔镜子宫切除术:随机对照试验的荟萃分析
J Minim Invasive Gynecol. 2016 Nov-Dec;23(7):1049-1056. doi: 10.1016/j.jmig.2016.08.826. Epub 2016 Aug 30.
4
Review and meta-analysis of prospective randomized controlled trials (RCTs) comparing laparo-endoscopic single site and multiport laparoscopy in gynecologic operative procedures.比较腹腔镜单孔与多孔腹腔镜在妇科手术中的前瞻性随机对照试验(RCT)的综述与荟萃分析。
Arch Gynecol Obstet. 2016 Sep;294(3):567-77. doi: 10.1007/s00404-016-4108-8. Epub 2016 May 11.
5
Total vaginal and single-port total laparoscopic hysterectomy for uterine benign diseases.全阴道及单孔全腹腔镜子宫切除术治疗子宫良性疾病
Minim Invasive Ther Allied Technol. 2016;25(3):148-53. doi: 10.3109/13645706.2016.1141102. Epub 2016 Feb 23.
6
Systematic review and meta-analysis of single-port versus conventional laparoscopic hysterectomy.单孔腹腔镜子宫切除术与传统腹腔镜子宫切除术的系统评价和荟萃分析
Int J Gynaecol Obstet. 2016 Apr;133(1):9-16. doi: 10.1016/j.ijgo.2015.08.013. Epub 2015 Dec 15.
7
Statistical power in parallel group point exposure studies with time-to-event outcomes: an empirical comparison of the performance of randomized controlled trials and the inverse probability of treatment weighting (IPTW) approach.具有事件发生时间结局的平行组点暴露研究中的统计效能:随机对照试验与治疗权重逆概率(IPTW)方法性能的实证比较。
BMC Med Res Methodol. 2015 Oct 15;15:87. doi: 10.1186/s12874-015-0081-3.
8
Moving towards best practice when using inverse probability of treatment weighting (IPTW) using the propensity score to estimate causal treatment effects in observational studies.在观察性研究中,利用倾向得分采用治疗权重的逆概率(IPTW)估计因果治疗效果时,朝着最佳实践迈进。
Stat Med. 2015 Dec 10;34(28):3661-79. doi: 10.1002/sim.6607. Epub 2015 Aug 3.
9
Robotic hysterectomy or myomectomy without power morcellation: A single-port assisted three-incision technique with manual morcellation.无动力粉碎的机器人子宫切除术或子宫肌瘤切除术:单孔辅助三切口技术及手动粉碎术
Int J Med Robot. 2016 Sep;12(3):483-9. doi: 10.1002/rcs.1668. Epub 2015 Jun 8.
10
YS knot: A new technique for a tension-controlled slip knot using a trocar.YS结:一种使用套管针的张力控制滑结新技术。
Obstet Gynecol Sci. 2015 Mar;58(2):171-4. doi: 10.5468/ogs.2015.58.2.171. Epub 2015 Mar 16.

单孔与多孔全腹腔镜子宫切除术在单中心的长期经验。

Long-term Experience of Single-port and Multi-port Total Laparoscopic Hysterectomy in a Single Center.

机构信息

Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, School of Medicine, Kyungpook National University, Kyungpook National University Chilgok Hospital, Daegu, Republic of Korea.

Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, School of Medicine, Kyungpook National University, Kyungpook National University Chilgok Hospital, Daegu, Republic of Korea

出版信息

In Vivo. 2022 Sep-Oct;36(5):2409-2413. doi: 10.21873/invivo.12974.

DOI:10.21873/invivo.12974
PMID:36099098
原文链接:https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC9463880/
Abstract

BACKGROUND/AIM: Short-term feasibility and safety of single-port total laparoscopic hysterectomy (TLH) compared with conventional multi-port TLH have been previously demonstrated. However, recent studies are insufficient. This study aimed to analyze long-term data from our center to examine the current status of single-port and multi-port TLH.

PATIENTS AND METHODS

In 766 patients who received TLH from 2005 to 2019, 325 were single-port and 441 were multi-port. Inclusion criteria were benign and premalignant uterine diseases. To reduce the impact of treatment selection bias and potential confounding factors, inverse probability of treatment weighting was applied.

RESULTS

Single-port TLH showed significantly better clinical outcomes for hospital stay, operative time, hemoglobin decrease, and complication rate than the multi-port TLH after correction of biases. C-reactive protein increased after the single-port TLH.

CONCLUSION

As laparoscopic surgical instruments and surgeon's skill have been improved, some surgical outcomes have become significantly better in single-port TLH after long-term observation.

摘要

背景/目的:与传统多孔腹腔镜子宫切除术(TLH)相比,单孔 TLH 的短期可行性和安全性已得到证实。然而,最近的研究还不够充分。本研究旨在分析我们中心的长期数据,以检查单孔和多孔 TLH 的现状。

患者和方法

在 2005 年至 2019 年间接受 TLH 的 766 名患者中,325 名接受了单孔 TLH,441 名接受了多孔 TLH。纳入标准为良性和癌前子宫疾病。为了减少治疗选择偏差和潜在混杂因素的影响,应用了逆概率治疗加权。

结果

经偏差校正后,单孔 TLH 在住院时间、手术时间、血红蛋白下降和并发症发生率方面的临床结局明显优于多孔 TLH。单孔 TLH 后 C 反应蛋白升高。

结论

随着腹腔镜手术器械和外科医生技能的提高,经过长期观察,单孔 TLH 的一些手术结果显著改善。