• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

疾病修正抗风湿药物治疗类风湿关节炎患者的医疗效果。

Health Care Effect of Disease-Modifying Antirheumatic Drug Use on Patients with Rheumatoid Arthritis.

机构信息

1Eli Lilly, Indianapolis, Indiana.

2Humana Healthcare Research, Louisville, Kentucky.

出版信息

J Manag Care Spec Pharm. 2019 Aug;25(8):879-887. doi: 10.18553/jmcp.2019.25.8.879.

DOI:10.18553/jmcp.2019.25.8.879
PMID:31347977
原文链接:https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC10398047/
Abstract

BACKGROUND

Disease-modifying antirheumatic drugs (DMARDs) are recommended as the standard of care for patients with rheumatoid arthritis (RA) due to their ability to reduce pain and disability; however, DMARD use is low in some subgroups of the RA population.

OBJECTIVE

To identify characteristics associated with DMARD use in the overall cohort of patients with RA and newly diagnosed RA patients.

METHODS

This retrospective observational study used claims from a large national health plan. Use of DMARDs was measured according to the Healthcare Effectiveness Data and Information Set (HEDIS) as the proportion of patients with RA receiving DMARDs. Following HEDIS measure technical specifications, we identified patients aged 18-89 years with continuous enrollment during 2014 (measurement year) with ≥ 2 claims for RA outpatient visits and/or discharges on different dates between January and November 2014. Additionally, we identified a subset of patients newly diagnosed with RA in 2014 based on absence of any claims for RA or DMARDs in 2013. Descriptive analyses and bivariate associations were used to compare demographic and clinical characteristics of patients with RA with or without DMARD use in 2014. Health care resource utilization (HCRU) and costs were compared in 2014 for patients enrolled in Medicare Advantage Prescription Drug (MAPD) plans during both 2014 and 2015. Regression models were used to evaluate patient and provider characteristics associated with DMARD use in 2014 and the effect on HCRU and costs.

RESULTS

Among the 33,880 patients identified with RA in 2014, most patients received a DMARD (75.2%); 29.4% of patients newly diagnosed with RA had been treated with DMARDs in 2014. Patients with DMARD use, on average, were younger (aged 67 years ± 10.7 vs. 69 years ± 10.7) and healthier (Deyo-Charlson Comorbidity Index [DCCI] 2.4 ± 1.9 vs. 2.6 ± 2.1) and included a greater proportion of women (75.9% vs. 71.0%) than those with no DMARD use ( < 0.0001). Use of DMARDs ( < 0.0001) was associated with 14.5% fewer hospitalizations and 18.0% fewer emergency department visits. Although total costs increased by 15.0% with use of DMARDs, when the cost of DMARDs was excluded, the total cost decreased by 13.7% ( < 0.0001). Female gender (32.2%), higher claims-based index for RA severity score (47.0%), higher RxRisk-V score (26.7%), visit to a rheumatologist (34.3%), and use of glucocorticoids (17.7%) increased the odds of DMARD use ( < 0.0001). Use of certain classes of medication, such as nonsteroidal anti-inflammatory drugs (12.3%), opioids (19.5%), antidepressants (20.0%), muscle relaxants (12.5%), and anticonvulsants (15.5%), were associated with lower use of DMARDs ( < 0.0001).

CONCLUSIONS

We found significant differences in demographic and clinical characteristics between patients with and without DMARD use, which can potentially inform treatment decisions regarding DMARD use as deemed necessary by the provider. Future research should investigate the reasons for lack of treatment.

DISCLOSURES

This study was supported by funding from Eli Lilly to Humana as a collaborative research project involving employees of both companies. Boytsov, Saverno, Zhang, and Gaich are employees of Eli Lilly. Nair, Bhattacharya, Abbott, and Dixon are employees of Humana, which received funding from Eli Lilly to complete this research.

摘要

背景

由于疾病修饰抗风湿药物(DMARD)能够减轻疼痛和残疾,因此被推荐为类风湿关节炎(RA)患者的标准治疗方法;然而,在 RA 患者的某些亚组中,DMARD 的使用较低。

目的

确定与 RA 患者总体队列和新诊断的 RA 患者中 DMARD 使用相关的特征。

方法

这是一项回顾性观察性研究,使用了来自大型全国健康计划的索赔数据。DMARD 的使用根据医疗保健效果数据和信息集(HEDIS)进行衡量,即接受 DMARD 治疗的 RA 患者比例。根据 HEDIS 测量技术规范,我们确定了在 2014 年(测量年)期间连续入组、2014 年 1 月至 11 月期间有≥2 次 RA 门诊就诊和/或不同日期出院的 18-89 岁患者。此外,我们根据 2013 年没有任何 RA 或 DMARD 索赔,确定了 2014 年新诊断为 RA 的患者亚组。比较 2014 年有或没有 DMARD 使用的 RA 患者的人口统计学和临床特征。比较 2014 年和 2015 年同时参加医疗保险优势处方药(MAPD)计划的患者的医疗保健资源利用(HCRU)和费用。使用回归模型评估与 2014 年 DMARD 使用相关的患者和提供者特征以及对 HCRU 和费用的影响。

结果

在 2014 年确定的 33880 名 RA 患者中,大多数患者接受了 DMARD(75.2%);29.4%的新诊断为 RA 的患者在 2014 年接受了 DMARD 治疗。使用 DMARD 的患者平均年龄较小(67 岁±10.7 岁比 69 岁±10.7 岁),健康状况较好(Deyo-Charlson 合并症指数[DCCI] 2.4±1.9 比 2.6±2.1),女性比例较高(75.9%比 71.0%),而不使用 DMARD 的患者(<0.0001)。使用 DMARD(<0.0001)与住院减少 14.5%和急诊就诊减少 18.0%相关。虽然使用 DMARD 会导致总费用增加 15.0%,但当排除 DMARD 的费用时,总费用减少了 13.7%(<0.0001)。女性(32.2%)、较高的基于索赔的 RA 严重程度评分指数(47.0%)、较高的 RxRisk-V 评分(26.7%)、看风湿病医生(34.3%)和使用糖皮质激素(17.7%)增加了使用 DMARD 的几率(<0.0001)。使用某些类别的药物,如非甾体抗炎药(12.3%)、阿片类药物(19.5%)、抗抑郁药(20.0%)、肌肉松弛剂(12.5%)和抗惊厥药(15.5%),与 DMARD 使用减少相关(<0.0001)。

结论

我们发现使用和不使用 DMARD 的患者在人口统计学和临床特征方面存在显著差异,这可能为提供者根据需要决定 DMARD 使用提供依据。未来的研究应调查缺乏治疗的原因。

披露

这项研究得到了礼来公司向Humana 提供的资金支持,作为涉及两家公司员工的合作研究项目。Boytsov、Saverno、Zhang 和 Gaich 是礼来公司的员工。Nair、Bhattacharya、Abbott 和 Dixon 是 Humana 的员工,该公司接受了礼来公司的资金支持以完成这项研究。

相似文献

1
Health Care Effect of Disease-Modifying Antirheumatic Drug Use on Patients with Rheumatoid Arthritis.疾病修正抗风湿药物治疗类风湿关节炎患者的医疗效果。
J Manag Care Spec Pharm. 2019 Aug;25(8):879-887. doi: 10.18553/jmcp.2019.25.8.879.
2
Factors associated with the initiation of biologic disease-modifying antirheumatic drugs in Texas Medicaid patients with rheumatoid arthritis.与德克萨斯州医疗补助计划(Medicaid)类风湿关节炎患者开始使用生物类改善病情抗风湿药物相关的因素。
J Manag Care Spec Pharm. 2015 May;21(5):401-7. doi: 10.18553/jmcp.2015.21.5.401.
3
Economic Burden of Patients with Inadequate Response to Targeted Immunomodulators for Rheumatoid Arthritis.类风湿关节炎患者对靶向免疫调节剂应答不足的经济负担。
J Manag Care Spec Pharm. 2018 Apr;24(4):344-352. doi: 10.18553/jmcp.2018.24.4.344.
4
Impact of Out-of-Pocket Costs on Prescription Fills Among New Initiators of Biologic Therapies for Rheumatoid Arthritis.生物制剂治疗类风湿关节炎新使用者自付费用对处方配药的影响。
J Manag Care Spec Pharm. 2016 Feb;22(2):122-30. doi: 10.18553/jmcp.2016.14261. Epub 2015 Dec 14.
5
Predictors of treatment initiation with tumor necrosis factor-α inhibitors in patients with rheumatoid arthritis.类风湿关节炎患者使用肿瘤坏死因子-α 抑制剂治疗的预测因素。
J Manag Care Spec Pharm. 2014 Nov;20(11):1110-20. doi: 10.18553/jmcp.2014.20.11.1110.
6
Economic Burden and Treatment Patterns of Cycling between Conventional Synthetic Disease-modifying Antirheumatic Drugs Among Biologic-treated Patients with Rheumatoid Arthritis.类风湿关节炎生物制剂治疗患者在传统合成改善病情抗风湿药物间转换的经济负担及治疗模式
Clin Ther. 2016 May;38(5):1205-16. doi: 10.1016/j.clinthera.2016.03.013. Epub 2016 Apr 2.
7
The Economic Burden of ACPA-Positive Status Among Patients with Rheumatoid Arthritis.抗环瓜氨酸肽抗体阳性的类风湿关节炎患者的经济负担。
J Manag Care Spec Pharm. 2018 Jan;24(1):4-11. doi: 10.18553/jmcp.2017.17129. Epub 2017 Jul 17.
8
Factors associated with the initiation of disease-modifying antirheumatic drugs in newly diagnosed rheumatoid arthritis: a retrospective claims database study.与新诊断类风湿关节炎开始使用疾病修正抗风湿药物相关的因素:一项回顾性理赔数据库研究。
Clin Ther. 2012 Feb;34(2):457-67. doi: 10.1016/j.clinthera.2011.12.016. Epub 2012 Jan 28.
9
Economic Evaluation of Anticyclic Citrullinated Peptide Positivity in Rheumatoid Arthritis.抗环瓜氨酸肽抗体阳性在类风湿关节炎中的经济学评价。
J Manag Care Spec Pharm. 2019 Apr;25(4):469-477. doi: 10.18553/jmcp.2019.25.4.469.
10
Determinants of first-line biological treatment in patients with rheumatoid arthritis: Results from an observational study.类风湿关节炎患者一线生物治疗的决定因素:一项观察性研究的结果。
Medicine (Baltimore). 2021 May 14;100(19):e25943. doi: 10.1097/MD.0000000000025943.

引用本文的文献

1
Disease-Modifying Antirheumatic Drug Use and Its Effect on Long-term Opioid Use in Patients With Rheumatoid Arthritis.改变病情抗风湿药物的使用及其对类风湿关节炎患者长期阿片类药物使用的影响。
J Clin Rheumatol. 2023 Sep 1;29(6):262-267. doi: 10.1097/RHU.0000000000001972. Epub 2023 Apr 26.
2
Identification and Validation of Hub Genes for Predicting Treatment Targets and Immune Landscape in Rheumatoid Arthritis.鉴定和验证类风湿关节炎治疗靶点和免疫景观的枢纽基因。
Biomed Res Int. 2022 Oct 22;2022:8023779. doi: 10.1155/2022/8023779. eCollection 2022.
3
Chrono-moxibustion adjusts circadian rhythm of CLOCK and BMAL1 in adjuvant-induced arthritic rats.时辰艾灸调节佐剂诱导性关节炎大鼠中CLOCK和BMAL1的昼夜节律。
Am J Transl Res. 2022 Jul 15;14(7):4880-4897. eCollection 2022.
4
Influence of Multimorbidity on New Treatment Initiation and Achieving Target Disease Activity Thresholds in Active Rheumatoid Arthritis: A Cohort Study Using the Rheumatology Informatics System for Effectiveness Registry.多病症对活动性类风湿关节炎中新治疗方案起始和达到目标疾病活动阈值的影响:使用类风湿关节炎疗效登记系统的信息学系统进行的队列研究。
Arthritis Care Res (Hoboken). 2023 Feb;75(2):231-239. doi: 10.1002/acr.24762. Epub 2022 Sep 10.
5
Methodological and reporting quality evaluation of meta-analyses on the Chinese herbal preparation Zheng Qing Feng Tong Ning for the treatment of rheumatoid arthritis.方法学和报告质量评价的荟萃分析,对中药制剂正清风痛宁治疗类风湿关节炎。
BMC Complement Med Ther. 2020 Jun 26;20(1):195. doi: 10.1186/s12906-020-02978-5.

本文引用的文献

1
How Do the Hospital Prices Paid by Medicare Advantage Plans and Commercial Plans Compare With Medicare Fee-for-Service Prices?医疗保险优势计划和商业保险计划支付的医院价格与医疗保险按服务收费价格相比如何?
Inquiry. 2018 Jan-Dec;55:46958018779654. doi: 10.1177/0046958018779654.
2
Treatment Patterns of Newly Diagnosed Rheumatoid Arthritis Patients from a Commercially Insured Population.来自商业保险人群的新诊断类风湿关节炎患者的治疗模式
Rheumatol Ther. 2018 Dec;5(2):355-369. doi: 10.1007/s40744-018-0114-6. Epub 2018 May 30.
3
Modeling Health Care Expenditures and Use.建模医疗保健支出和使用。
Annu Rev Public Health. 2018 Apr 1;39:489-505. doi: 10.1146/annurev-publhealth-040617-013517. Epub 2018 Jan 12.
4
Prevalence of rheumatoid arthritis in the United States adult population in healthcare claims databases, 2004-2014.2004-2014 年美国医疗保健索赔数据库中成年人群类风湿关节炎的流行率。
Rheumatol Int. 2017 Sep;37(9):1551-1557. doi: 10.1007/s00296-017-3726-1. Epub 2017 Apr 28.
5
EULAR recommendations for the management of rheumatoid arthritis with synthetic and biological disease-modifying antirheumatic drugs: 2016 update.EULAR 推荐的类风湿关节炎治疗策略:2016 年更新版
Ann Rheum Dis. 2017 Jun;76(6):960-977. doi: 10.1136/annrheumdis-2016-210715. Epub 2017 Mar 6.
6
Geographic Variation in the Quality and Cost of Care for Patients with Rheumatoid Arthritis.类风湿关节炎患者的医疗质量和费用的地域差异。
J Manag Care Spec Pharm. 2016 Dec;22(12):1472-1481. doi: 10.18553/jmcp.2016.22.12.1472.
7
2015 American College of Rheumatology Guideline for the Treatment of Rheumatoid Arthritis.2015 年美国风湿病学会类风湿关节炎治疗指南。
Arthritis Rheumatol. 2016 Jan;68(1):1-26. doi: 10.1002/art.39480. Epub 2015 Nov 6.
8
Epidemiology and Treatment of New-Onset and Established Rheumatoid Arthritis in an Insured US Population.美国参保人群中新发和已确诊类风湿关节炎的流行病学及治疗情况
Arthritis Care Res (Hoboken). 2015 Dec;67(12):1646-55. doi: 10.1002/acr.22646.
9
Pain in rheumatoid arthritis: a critical review.类风湿关节炎中的疼痛:一项批判性综述。
Reumatismo. 2014 Jun 6;66(1):18-27. doi: 10.4081/reumatismo.2014.760.
10
Predictors of stopping and starting disease-modifying antirheumatic drugs for rheumatoid arthritis.类风湿关节炎疾病改善抗风湿药物停药和重新用药的预测因素
Arthritis Care Res (Hoboken). 2014 Aug;66(8):1152-8. doi: 10.1002/acr.22286.