• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

对YouTube上妇产科体格检查视频的批判性综述:内容分析与用户参与度评估。

A critical review of obstetric and gynecological physical examination videos available on YouTube: Content analysis and user engagement evaluation.

作者信息

Abdulghani Hamza Mohammad, Haque Shafiul, Ahmad Tauseef, Irshad Mohammad, Sattar Kamran, Al-Harbi Mohammed Meteb, Khamis Nehal

机构信息

Department of Medical Education.

Research and Scientific Studies Unit, College of Nursing and Allied Health Sciences, Jazan University, Jazan.

出版信息

Medicine (Baltimore). 2019 Jul;98(30):e16459. doi: 10.1097/MD.0000000000016459.

DOI:10.1097/MD.0000000000016459
PMID:31348247
原文链接:https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC6708872/
Abstract

BACKGROUND

Video-sharing website "YouTube" is a growing source of healthcare information. But, the videos uploaded on this open platform are not peer reviewed, therefore, the information available needs to be sufficiently evaluated. No studies have been conducted to evaluate the authenticity and utility of obstetrics and gynecology (Obs/Gyne) physical examination YouTube videos. This study was performed to analyze the sources, contents, and quality of videos about the Obs/Gyne clinical examination available on YouTube.

METHODS

A systematic search was performed on YouTube website using the following key words: "OBSTETRIC," "GYNECOLOGICAL," "SPECULUM OBSTETRIC," "OBSTETRIC CLINICAL," "BIMANUAL PELVIC," and "EXAMINATION" to analyze the sources, contents, and the quality of YouTube videos about the Obs/Gyne clinical examination during the period between November 2015 and March 2017. The videos were classified into educationally useful and useless based on the content, accuracy of the knowledge, and the demonstration.

RESULTS

Out of total 457 screened videos, 176 (38.51%) videos met the pre-set inclusion criteria. After review, out of 176 pertinent videos, 84 (47.7%) videos were found educationally useful, and out of these 84 useful videos, only 29 (34.5%) were highly educational in nature.

CONCLUSION

YouTube videos showed variable educational value. Only, a small number of videos were identified as useful and can be used by the medical students for self-directed learning and by the clinical teachers for educational purposes or other academic activities.

摘要

背景

视频分享网站“YouTube”正日益成为医疗保健信息的来源。但是,在这个开放平台上上传的视频未经同行评审,因此,所提供的信息需要充分评估。尚未有研究对妇产科体格检查的YouTube视频的真实性和实用性进行评估。本研究旨在分析YouTube上有关妇产科临床检查视频的来源、内容和质量。

方法

在YouTube网站上进行系统搜索,使用以下关键词:“产科”、“妇科”、“产科窥器”、“产科临床”、“双合诊盆腔”和“检查”,以分析2015年11月至2017年3月期间有关妇产科临床检查的YouTube视频的来源、内容和质量。根据内容、知识准确性和演示情况,将这些视频分为具有教育价值和无教育价值两类。

结果

在总共筛选的457个视频中,176个(38.51%)视频符合预设的纳入标准。经审查,在176个相关视频中,84个(47.7%)视频被认为具有教育价值,在这84个有用的视频中,只有29个(34.5%)具有高度教育性质。

结论

YouTube视频显示出不同的教育价值。只有少数视频被确定为有用,可供医学生进行自主学习,也可供临床教师用于教学目的或其他学术活动。

https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/0f7e/6708872/f080c59e5636/medi-98-e16459-g001.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/0f7e/6708872/f080c59e5636/medi-98-e16459-g001.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/0f7e/6708872/f080c59e5636/medi-98-e16459-g001.jpg

相似文献

1
A critical review of obstetric and gynecological physical examination videos available on YouTube: Content analysis and user engagement evaluation.对YouTube上妇产科体格检查视频的批判性综述:内容分析与用户参与度评估。
Medicine (Baltimore). 2019 Jul;98(30):e16459. doi: 10.1097/MD.0000000000016459.
2
Medical professionalism videos on YouTube: Content exploration and appraisal of user engagement.YouTube 上的医学专业精神视频:内容探索与用户参与度评估
Saudi J Biol Sci. 2020 Sep;27(9):2287-2292. doi: 10.1016/j.sjbs.2020.06.007. Epub 2020 Jun 12.
3
Evaluation of the Reliability, Utility, and Quality of the Information in Sleeve Gastrectomy Videos Shared on Open Access Video Sharing Platform YouTube.开放获取视频分享平台YouTube上袖状胃切除术视频中信息的可靠性、实用性及质量评估
Obes Surg. 2019 May;29(5):1477-1484. doi: 10.1007/s11695-019-03738-2.
4
An Evaluation of the Usefulness of YouTube® Videos on Crown Preparation.《关于 YouTube®视频在牙冠预备中应用价值的评估》
Biomed Res Int. 2022 Jan 22;2022:1897705. doi: 10.1155/2022/1897705. eCollection 2022.
5
Evaluation of the educational value of YouTube videos about physical examination of the cardiovascular and respiratory systems.关于心血管和呼吸系统体格检查的YouTube视频的教育价值评估。
J Med Internet Res. 2013 Nov 13;15(11):e241. doi: 10.2196/jmir.2728.
6
Evaluation of the reliability, utility, and quality of the information in cardiopulmonary resuscitation videos shared on Open access video sharing platform YouTube.评估在开放获取视频分享平台 YouTube 上分享的心肺复苏术视频的可靠性、实用性和信息质量。
Australas Emerg Care. 2020 Sep;23(3):211-216. doi: 10.1016/j.auec.2020.05.005. Epub 2020 Jun 17.
7
Evaluating the Accuracy and Quality of the Information in Kyphosis Videos Shared on YouTube.评估 YouTube 上分享的脊柱后凸视频中的信息准确性和质量。
Spine (Phila Pa 1976). 2018 Nov 15;43(22):E1334-E1339. doi: 10.1097/BRS.0000000000002691.
8
Understanding pharmacokinetics: are YouTube videos a useful learning resource?了解药物动力学:YouTube视频是有用的学习资源吗?
Eur Rev Med Pharmacol Sci. 2014 Jul;18(13):1957-67.
9
Analysis of the quality, reliability, and popularity of information on strabismus on YouTube.分析 YouTube 上斜视相关信息的质量、可靠性和普及度。
Strabismus. 2020 Dec;28(4):175-180. doi: 10.1080/09273972.2020.1836002. Epub 2020 Oct 19.
10
Is quality of YouTube content on Bankart lesion and its surgical treatment adequate?关于 Bankart 损伤及其手术治疗的 YouTube 内容质量是否足够?
J Orthop Surg Res. 2020 Feb 26;15(1):78. doi: 10.1186/s13018-020-01590-0.

引用本文的文献

1
YouTube Hindi Videos Proved to be a Valid and Reliable Source of Health Information: A Case Study of COVID-19 Vaccine.YouTube上的印地语视频被证明是健康信息的有效且可靠来源:以新冠疫苗为例的一项案例研究。
Indian J Community Med. 2025 Jan-Feb;50(1):169-174. doi: 10.4103/ijcm.ijcm_813_23. Epub 2025 Jan 23.
2
YouTube as a Source of Patient Information on External Cephalic Version: Cross-Sectional Study.YouTube作为外部胎位倒转术患者信息来源的横断面研究。
JMIR Form Res. 2024 Jun 6;8:e50087. doi: 10.2196/50087.
3
Neurological Examination: An Evaluation of Video-Based Learning.

本文引用的文献

1
YouTube in medical education: a student's perspective.医学教育中的YouTube:学生视角
Med Educ Online. 2015 Sep 16;20:29507. doi: 10.3402/meo.v20.29507. eCollection 2015.
2
Evaluation of the educational value of YouTube videos about physical examination of the cardiovascular and respiratory systems.关于心血管和呼吸系统体格检查的YouTube视频的教育价值评估。
J Med Internet Res. 2013 Nov 13;15(11):e241. doi: 10.2196/jmir.2728.
3
Identifying Measures Used for Assessing Quality of YouTube Videos with Patient Health Information: A Review of Current Literature.
神经学检查:基于视频学习的评估
Cureus. 2024 Jan 8;16(1):e51866. doi: 10.7759/cureus.51866. eCollection 2024 Jan.
4
Content and quality of YouTube regarding women's health: a scoping review.YouTube 上有关女性健康的内容和质量:范围综述。
Korean J Women Health Nurs. 2023 Sep;29(3):179-189. doi: 10.4069/kjwhn.2023.08.19. Epub 2023 Sep 26.
5
Hysteroscopy in the new media: quality and reliability analysis of hysteroscopy procedures on YouTube™.新媒体中的宫腔镜:YouTube™ 上宫腔镜手术的质量和可靠性分析。
Arch Gynecol Obstet. 2023 Nov;308(5):1515-1524. doi: 10.1007/s00404-023-07172-9. Epub 2023 Aug 12.
6
Evaluation of the Reliability and Quality of YouTube Videos on Ovarian Cysts.YouTube上关于卵巢囊肿视频的可靠性和质量评估。
Cureus. 2022 Mar 1;14(3):e22739. doi: 10.7759/cureus.22739. eCollection 2022 Mar.
7
Harnessing Machine Learning to Personalize Web-Based Health Care Content.利用机器学习实现基于网络的个性化医疗保健内容。
J Med Internet Res. 2021 Oct 19;23(10):e25497. doi: 10.2196/25497.
8
Implications of the COVID-19 Pandemic on the Mental Health and Professional Psychomotor Skills of Dental Students.新冠疫情对牙科专业学生心理健康及专业心理运动技能的影响
Psychol Res Behav Manag. 2021 Jun 3;14:675-685. doi: 10.2147/PRBM.S317641. eCollection 2021.
9
Objective validation of YouTube™ educational videos for the instruction of regional anesthesia nerve blocks: a novel approach.YouTube™ 教育视频用于指导区域麻醉神经阻滞的客观验证:一种新方法。
BMC Anesthesiol. 2020 Jul 9;20(1):168. doi: 10.1186/s12871-020-01084-w.
识别用于评估包含患者健康信息的YouTube视频质量的指标:当前文献综述
Interact J Med Res. 2013 Feb 28;2(1):e6. doi: 10.2196/ijmr.2465.
4
A systematic review of healthcare applications for smartphones.智能手机在医疗保健领域的应用:系统评价
BMC Med Inform Decis Mak. 2012 Jul 10;12:67. doi: 10.1186/1472-6947-12-67.
5
How to inform: comparing written and video education interventions to increase human papillomavirus knowledge and vaccination intentions in young adults.如何告知:比较书面和视频教育干预措施,以提高年轻人对人乳头瘤病毒的知识和接种意愿。
J Am Coll Health. 2012;60(4):316-22. doi: 10.1080/07448481.2011.615355.
6
The use of video-clips as a teaching aide.使用视频片段作为教学辅助工具。
Eur J Dent Educ. 2012 May;16(2):91-6. doi: 10.1111/j.1600-0579.2011.00724.x. Epub 2011 Dec 20.
7
Sicily statement on classification and development of evidence-based practice learning assessment tools.西西里岛关于循证实践学习评估工具的分类和发展的声明。
BMC Med Educ. 2011 Oct 5;11:78. doi: 10.1186/1472-6920-11-78.
8
Learning physical examination skills outside timetabled training sessions: what happens and why?在规定的培训课程之外学习体检技能:会发生什么,为什么会发生?
Adv Health Sci Educ Theory Pract. 2012 Aug;17(3):339-55. doi: 10.1007/s10459-011-9312-5. Epub 2011 Jun 28.
9
Cancer survivorship in the age of YouTube and social media: a narrative analysis.YouTube和社交媒体时代的癌症幸存者经历:一项叙事分析
J Med Internet Res. 2011 Jan 17;13(1):e7. doi: 10.2196/jmir.1569.
10
YouTube as a source of information on cardiopulmonary resuscitation.YouTube 作为心肺复苏术信息来源。
Resuscitation. 2011 Mar;82(3):332-4. doi: 10.1016/j.resuscitation.2010.11.015. Epub 2010 Dec 24.