关于 Bankart 损伤及其手术治疗的 YouTube 内容质量是否足够？
Is quality of YouTube content on Bankart lesion and its surgical treatment adequate?
机构信息
Department of Orthopaedics and Traumatology, Fatih Sultan Mehmet Training and Research Hospital, Istanbul, Turkey.
出版信息
J Orthop Surg Res. 2020 Feb 26;15(1):78. doi: 10.1186/s13018-020-01590-0.
BACKGROUND
The Internet has developed into a fast and easy to access source of information. The second most popular social media network is YouTube. We aimed to evaluate the accuracy and quality of videos uploaded to YouTube about Bankart lesion without diagnostic or treatment-related criteria.
METHODS
Various keywords were searched for on YouTube. Videos were evaluated with the DISCERN and JAMA Benchmark scoring systems by two independent reviewers.
RESULTS
A total of 48 videos were taken into evaluation as a result of the search. The mean view count was 28909.68 ± 30264.3. Mean length of the videos was 313,06 ± 344.65. The average DISCERN score of both reviewers was 2.35 ± 0.91. The average JAMA Benchmark score of both reviewers was 2.11 ± 0.77.
CONCLUSION
We concluded that the accuracy and reliability of the videos obtained from YouTube by searching for the words Bankart and labrum lesion/injury/treatment are low.
背景
互联网已发展成为一个快速且易于获取信息的来源。第二大受欢迎的社交媒体网络是 YouTube。我们旨在评估关于 Bankart 病变的 YouTube 上未包含诊断或治疗相关标准的上传视频的准确性和质量。
方法
在 YouTube 上搜索了各种关键词。视频由两名独立评审员使用 DISCERN 和 JAMA 基准评分系统进行评估。
结果
由于搜索，共评估了 48 个视频。平均观看次数为 28909.68 ± 30264.3。视频的平均长度为 313.06 ± 344.65。两位评审员的平均 DISCERN 得分为 2.35 ± 0.91。两位评审员的平均 JAMA 基准评分均为 2.11 ± 0.77。
结论
我们得出结论，通过搜索 Bankart 和盂唇损伤/病变/治疗等关键词在 YouTube 上获得的视频的准确性和可靠性较低。
Zotero 插件