Suppr超能文献

碳离子再放疗治疗复发性头颈部肿瘤:单机构经验。

Carbon Ion Reirradiation for Recurrent Head and Neck Cancer: A Single-Institutional Experience.

机构信息

Heidelberg University Hospital, Department of Radiation Oncology, Heidelberg, Germany; Heidelberg Institute of Radiation Oncology (HIRO), Heidelberg, Germany; National Center for Tumor Diseases (NCT), Heidelberg, Germany.

Department of Otorhinolaryngology, University of Heidelberg, Heidelberg, Germany.

出版信息

Int J Radiat Oncol Biol Phys. 2019 Nov 15;105(4):803-811. doi: 10.1016/j.ijrobp.2019.07.021. Epub 2019 Jul 23.

Abstract

PURPOSE

This study aimed to assess the feasibility of carbon ion reirradiation (CIR) for recurrent head and neck cancer (HNC).

METHODS AND MATERIALS

This retrospective study included 229 patients with recurrent HNC who were treated with CIR between 2010 and 2017. We assessed progression-free survival, overall survival, pattern of failure, and toxicity. Of the primary tumors, 54.1% were adenoid cystic carcinomas, 26.2% were squamous cell carcinomas, 8.3% were adenocarcinomas, and 11.4% were other tumor entities.

RESULTS

The median radiation therapy interval was 3.9 years (range, 0.3-46.5 years), and patients received a median dose of 51 Gy (relative biological effectiveness [RBE]; range, 30-66 Gy [RBE]) in 3 Gy (RBE) fractions. The median cumulative lifetime dose after CIR was 132.8 Gy (range, 88.8-155.0 Gy). The median local progression-free survival after CIR was 24.2 months (95% confidence interval, 19.4-29.0 months), and the median overall survival was 26.1 months (95% confidence interval, 21.9-30.3 months). Serious acute toxicity (grade ≥3) after CIR included laryngeal edema, grade 4 (n = 2; 0.9%); dysphagia, grade 3 (n = 3; 1.3%); fistula, grade 3 (n = 1; 0.4%); and impaired hearing, grade 3 (n = 1; 0.4%). Late toxicities of grades 3 or higher (n = 18; 14.5%) included central nervous system necrosis, grades 4/3 (n = 1; 0.8%/n = 5; 4.0%); optic nerve disorder, grades 4/3 (n = 2; 1.6%/n = 2; 1.6%); impaired hearing, grade 3 (n = 5; 4.0%), osteonecrosis, grade 3 (n = 1; 0.8%); and carotid blowout, grade 4 (n = 1; 0.8%).

CONCLUSIONS

In patients with locally recurrent HNC, CIR was a feasible, effective treatment with acceptable toxicity and good local control. Thus, CIR represented a valuable alternative to surgical salvage and palliative chemotherapy in selected patients.

摘要

目的

本研究旨在评估碳离子再放疗(CIR)治疗复发性头颈部癌症(HNC)的可行性。

方法与材料

本回顾性研究纳入了 2010 年至 2017 年间接受 CIR 治疗的 229 例复发性 HNC 患者。我们评估了无进展生存期、总生存期、失败模式和毒性。原发性肿瘤中,54.1%为腺样囊性癌,26.2%为鳞状细胞癌,8.3%为腺癌,11.4%为其他肿瘤实体。

结果

中位放疗间隔时间为 3.9 年(范围,0.3-46.5 年),患者接受的中位剂量为 51 Gy(相对生物效应[RBE];范围,30-66 Gy [RBE]),分割剂量为 3 Gy(RBE)。CIR 后的中位累积终生剂量为 132.8 Gy(范围,88.8-155.0 Gy)。CIR 后中位局部无进展生存期为 24.2 个月(95%置信区间,19.4-29.0 个月),中位总生存期为 26.1 个月(95%置信区间,21.9-30.3 个月)。CIR 后严重的急性毒性(≥3 级)包括喉水肿,4 级(n=2;0.9%);吞咽困难,3 级(n=3;1.3%);瘘管,3 级(n=1;0.4%);听力受损,3 级(n=1;0.4%)。3 级或更高(n=18;14.5%)的迟发性毒性包括中枢神经系统坏死,4/3 级(n=1;0.8%/n=5;4.0%);视神经障碍,4/3 级(n=2;1.6%/n=2;1.6%);听力受损,3 级(n=5;4.0%),骨坏死,3 级(n=1;0.8%);颈动脉破裂,4 级(n=1;0.8%)。

结论

在局部复发性 HNC 患者中,CIR 是一种可行、有效的治疗方法,具有可接受的毒性和良好的局部控制。因此,在选择的患者中,CIR 是手术挽救和姑息性化疗的有价值的替代方法。

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验