Department of Radiology, University Hospital François-Mitterrand, 21000 Dijon, France.
Inserm, U1032, LabTau, 69003 Lyon, France.
Diagn Interv Imaging. 2019 Dec;100(12):801-811. doi: 10.1016/j.diii.2019.06.012. Epub 2019 Jul 23.
To assess the performance of a computer-aided diagnosis (CADx) system trained at characterizing International Society of Urological Pathology (ISUP) grade≥2 peripheral zone (PZ) prostate cancers on multiparametric magnetic resonance imaging (mpMRI) examinations from a different institution and acquired on different scanners than those used for the training database.
Preoperative mpMRIs of 74 men (median age, 65.7 years) treated by prostatectomy between 2014 and 2017 were retrospectively selected. One radiologist outlined suspicious lesions and scored them using Prostate Imaging-Reporting and Data System version 2 (PI-RADSv2); their CADx score was calculated using a classifier trained on an independent database of 106 patients treated by prostatectomy in another institution. The lesions' nature was assessed by comparison with prostatectomy whole-mounts. Diagnostic accuracy was estimated with areas under receiver operating characteristic curves (AUCs). Sensitivity and specificity were calculated using a CADx threshold (≥0.21) that yielded 95% sensitivity in the training database, and a PI-RADSv2≥3 threshold.
A total of 127 lesions (PZ, n=104; transition zone [TZ], n=23) were described. In PZ, CADx and PI-RADSv2 scores had similar AUCs for characterizing ISUP grade≥2 cancers (0.78 [95% confidence interval (CI): 0.69-0.87] vs. 0.74 [95%CI: 0.62-0.82], respectively) (P=0.59). Sensitivity and specificity were respectively 89% (95%CI: 82-97%) and 42% (95%CI: 26-58%) for the CADx score, and 97% (95%CI: 93-100%) and 37% (95%CI: 22-52%) for the PI-RADSv2 score. In TZ, both scores showed poor specificity.
In this external cohort, the CADx and PI-RADSv2 scores showed similar performances in characterizing ISUP grade≥2 cancers.
评估一个计算机辅助诊断(CADx)系统的性能,该系统经过训练,可以对来自不同机构的多参数磁共振成像(mpMRI)检查中国际泌尿病理学会(ISUP)分级≥2 的外周区(PZ)前列腺癌进行特征描述,这些检查使用的扫描仪与训练数据库中的扫描仪不同。
回顾性选择了 2014 年至 2017 年间接受前列腺切除术治疗的 74 名男性患者(中位年龄 65.7 岁)的术前 mpMRI。一位放射科医生对可疑病变进行轮廓描绘,并使用前列腺影像报告和数据系统第 2 版(PI-RADSv2)进行评分;他们的 CADx 评分是使用另一家机构接受前列腺切除术的 106 名患者的独立数据库中的分类器计算得出的。通过与前列腺切除术全切片进行比较来评估病变的性质。使用受试者工作特征曲线下面积(AUC)来评估诊断准确性。使用在训练数据库中产生 95%敏感性的 CADx 阈值(≥0.21)和 PI-RADSv2≥3 阈值来计算敏感性和特异性。
共描述了 127 个病变(PZ,n=104;移行区[TZ],n=23)。在 PZ 中,CADx 和 PI-RADSv2 评分在特征描述 ISUP 分级≥2 癌症方面具有相似的 AUC(分别为 0.78 [95%置信区间(CI):0.69-0.87] 和 0.74 [95%CI:0.62-0.82])(P=0.59)。CADx 评分的敏感性和特异性分别为 89%(95%CI:82-97%)和 42%(95%CI:26-58%),PI-RADSv2 评分的敏感性和特异性分别为 97%(95%CI:93-100%)和 37%(95%CI:22-52%)。在 TZ 中,两个评分的特异性都较差。
在这个外部队列中,CADx 和 PI-RADSv2 评分在特征描述 ISUP 分级≥2 癌症方面表现相似。