• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

前瞻性观察研究,评估在常规临床实践中,用于治疗实体瘤骨转移患者的地舒单抗的持续性:最终分析。

Prospective observational study to evaluate the persistence of treatment with denosumab in patients with bone metastases from solid tumors in routine clinical practice: final analysis.

机构信息

Abteilung für Innere Medizin, Salzkammergut Klinikum Vöcklabruck, Dr.-Wilhelm-Bock-Straße 1, A-4840, Vöcklabruck, Austria.

Ordensklinikum Linz Barmherzige Schwestern/Elisabethinen, Linz, Austria.

出版信息

Support Care Cancer. 2020 Apr;28(4):1855-1865. doi: 10.1007/s00520-019-04988-7. Epub 2019 Jul 26.

DOI:10.1007/s00520-019-04988-7
PMID:31350601
原文链接:https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC7036060/
Abstract

PURPOSE

In the integrated analysis of phase III head-to-head trials in patients with advanced solid tumors, denosumab demonstrated superiority over zoledronic acid in preventing skeletal-related events (SREs). Regular and continued drug use (persistence) is a precondition of clinical efficacy; persistence in real-life is yet undetermined for denosumab.

METHODS

This was a single-arm, prospective, observational, non-interventional study in 598 patients with bone metastases from breast, prostate, lung, or other solid tumors treated with denosumab every four weeks in real-world clinical practice in Austria, Czech Republic, Hungary, Slovakia, and Bulgaria. Persistence was defined as denosumab administration at ≤ 35-day intervals over 24 or 48 weeks, respectively.

RESULTS

Previous SREs were found in 10.9% of patients. 62.6% were persistent over 24 weeks and 40.1% over 48 weeks. The Kaplan-Meier median (95% CI) time to non-persistence was 274.0 days (232.0, 316.0). The most frequent reason for non-persistence was delayed administration. There was a trend towards weaker analgesics over time, with approximately 60% of patients not requiring any analgesics. Serum calcium remained within the normal range throughout the study. Adjudicated osteonecrosis of the jaw was documented in three patients with an incidence per patient-year (95% CI) of 0.012 (0.004, 0.029).

CONCLUSIONS

Most patients received denosumab regularly once every four weeks over 24 weeks of treatment. Non-persistence was mainly due to delayed administration. The incidence of adverse drug reactions, especially of osteonecrosis of the jaw, was in line with expectations from previous studies.

摘要

目的

在晚期实体瘤患者的 III 期头对头试验的综合分析中,地舒单抗在预防骨骼相关事件(SREs)方面优于唑来膦酸。定期和持续用药(持久性)是临床疗效的前提;然而,地舒单抗在现实生活中的持久性尚未确定。

方法

这是一项在奥地利、捷克共和国、匈牙利、斯洛伐克和保加利亚的 598 名患有乳腺癌、前列腺癌、肺癌或其他实体瘤骨转移的患者中进行的单臂、前瞻性、观察性、非干预性研究,这些患者在现实临床实践中每四周接受一次地舒单抗治疗。持久性定义为在 24 或 48 周内,地舒单抗的给药间隔≤35 天。

结果

10.9%的患者有既往 SREs。62.6%的患者在 24 周内持续用药,40.1%的患者在 48 周内持续用药。非持久性的 Kaplan-Meier 中位(95%CI)时间为 274.0 天(232.0,316.0)。非持久性最常见的原因是给药延迟。随着时间的推移,镇痛药的使用呈下降趋势,约 60%的患者无需使用任何镇痛药。整个研究期间血清钙均保持在正常范围内。三名患者确诊为颌骨坏死,每位患者的年发生率(95%CI)为 0.012(0.004,0.029)。

结论

大多数患者在 24 周的治疗中每四周接受一次地舒单抗常规治疗。非持久性主要是由于给药延迟。不良药物反应的发生率,特别是颌骨坏死的发生率,与之前研究的预期一致。

相似文献

1
Prospective observational study to evaluate the persistence of treatment with denosumab in patients with bone metastases from solid tumors in routine clinical practice: final analysis.前瞻性观察研究,评估在常规临床实践中,用于治疗实体瘤骨转移患者的地舒单抗的持续性:最终分析。
Support Care Cancer. 2020 Apr;28(4):1855-1865. doi: 10.1007/s00520-019-04988-7. Epub 2019 Jul 26.
2
Persistence of denosumab in Slovak patients with bone metastases - a prospective observational study.在伴有骨转移的斯洛伐克患者中地舒单抗的持久性-一项前瞻性观察性研究。
Klin Onkol. 2023 Winter;36(1):54-64. doi: 10.48095/ccko202354.
3
Delaying skeletal-related events in a randomized phase 3 study of denosumab versus zoledronic acid in patients with advanced cancer: an analysis of data from patients with solid tumors.在一项针对晚期癌症患者的地舒单抗与唑来膦酸的随机 3 期研究中延迟骨骼相关事件:来自实体瘤患者的数据分析。
Support Care Cancer. 2014 Mar;22(3):679-87. doi: 10.1007/s00520-013-2022-1. Epub 2013 Oct 26.
4
Osteonecrosis of the jaw among patients with cancer treated with denosumab or zoledronic acid: Results of a regulator-mandated cohort postauthorization safety study in Denmark, Norway, and Sweden.癌症患者接受地舒单抗或唑来膦酸治疗后的颌骨坏死:丹麦、挪威和瑞典监管机构授权后队列安全性研究结果。
Cancer. 2021 Nov 1;127(21):4050-4058. doi: 10.1002/cncr.33802. Epub 2021 Jul 26.
5
Safety of long-term denosumab therapy: results from the open label extension phase of two phase 3 studies in patients with metastatic breast and prostate cancer.长期地诺单抗治疗的安全性:两项针对转移性乳腺癌和前列腺癌患者的3期研究开放标签扩展阶段的结果
Support Care Cancer. 2016 Jan;24(1):447-455. doi: 10.1007/s00520-015-2904-5. Epub 2015 Sep 3.
6
Incidence of osteonecrosis of the jaw in patients with bone metastases treated sequentially with bisphosphonates and denosumab.接受双膦酸盐和地诺单抗序贯治疗的骨转移患者颌骨坏死的发生率。
Acta Clin Belg. 2018 Apr;73(2):100-109. doi: 10.1080/17843286.2017.1348001. Epub 2017 Jul 10.
7
Denosumab Versus Zoledronic Acid in the Prevention of Skeletal-related Events in Vulnerable Cancer Patients: A Meta-analysis of Randomized, Controlled Trials.地舒单抗与唑来膦酸预防脆弱性癌症患者骨骼相关事件的比较:一项随机对照试验的荟萃分析。
Clin Ther. 2020 Aug;42(8):1494-1507.e1. doi: 10.1016/j.clinthera.2020.05.019. Epub 2020 Jul 24.
8
Persistence, adherence, and medication-taking behavior in women with postmenopausal osteoporosis receiving denosumab in routine practice in Germany, Austria, Greece, and Belgium: 12-month results from a European non-interventional study.在德国、奥地利、希腊和比利时接受地诺单抗治疗的绝经后骨质疏松症女性的持续性、依从性和服药行为:一项欧洲非干预性研究的12个月结果
Osteoporos Int. 2015 Oct;26(10):2479-89. doi: 10.1007/s00198-015-3164-4. Epub 2015 May 28.
9
Factors associated with high 24-month persistence with denosumab: results of a real-world, non-interventional study of women with postmenopausal osteoporosis in Germany, Austria, Greece, and Belgium.与地诺单抗24个月高持续率相关的因素:德国、奥地利、希腊和比利时绝经后骨质疏松症女性的一项真实世界、非干预性研究结果
Arch Osteoporos. 2017 Dec;12(1):58. doi: 10.1007/s11657-017-0351-2. Epub 2017 Jun 22.
10
Cost-effectiveness of denosumab versus zoledronic acid for preventing skeletal-related events in the Czech Republic.在捷克共和国,地诺单抗与唑来膦酸预防骨相关事件的成本效益比较
J Med Econ. 2017 Aug;20(8):799-812. doi: 10.1080/13696998.2017.1328423. Epub 2017 Jun 7.

引用本文的文献

1
Treatment of bone metastases from solid tumors with bone-modifying agents: a web survey of Italian oncologists investigating patterns of practice drug prescription and prevention of side effects.实体瘤骨转移的骨改良药物治疗:一项针对意大利肿瘤学家的网络调查,旨在研究药物处方和预防副作用的实践模式。
Support Care Cancer. 2024 Mar 1;32(3):202. doi: 10.1007/s00520-024-08392-8.
2
Medication adherence with denosumab in patients with bone metastases from solid tumors treated in routine clinical settings: a retrospective study.在常规临床环境中治疗的实体瘤骨转移患者中使用地舒单抗的药物依从性:一项回顾性研究。
Support Care Cancer. 2022 Nov;30(11):9267-9278. doi: 10.1007/s00520-022-07333-7. Epub 2022 Sep 6.
3

本文引用的文献

1
Cost of skeletal complications from bone metastases in six European countries.六个欧洲国家骨转移引起的骨骼并发症的成本。
J Med Econ. 2016 Jun;19(6):611-8. doi: 10.3111/13696998.2016.1150852. Epub 2016 Feb 23.
2
Superiority of denosumab to zoledronic acid for prevention of skeletal-related events: a combined analysis of 3 pivotal, randomised, phase 3 trials.地舒单抗优于唑来膦酸预防骨骼相关事件:3 项关键性、随机、3 期临床试验的联合分析。
Eur J Cancer. 2012 Nov;48(16):3082-92. doi: 10.1016/j.ejca.2012.08.002. Epub 2012 Sep 10.
3
Denosumab versus zoledronic acid for treatment of bone metastases in men with castration-resistant prostate cancer: a randomised, double-blind study.
Safety and efficacy of extended dosing intervals of denosumab in patients with solid cancers and bone metastases: a retrospective study.
地诺单抗延长给药间隔时间在实体癌和骨转移患者中的安全性和有效性:一项回顾性研究。
Ther Adv Med Oncol. 2020 Dec 23;12:1758835920982859. doi: 10.1177/1758835920982859. eCollection 2020.
4
A Retrospective Observational Study of Risk Factors for Denosumab-Related Osteonecrosis of the Jaw in Patients with Bone Metastases from Solid Cancers.实体癌骨转移患者中地诺单抗相关颌骨坏死危险因素的回顾性观察研究
Cancers (Basel). 2020 May 12;12(5):1209. doi: 10.3390/cancers12051209.
地舒单抗对比唑来膦酸治疗去势抵抗性前列腺癌骨转移患者的随机、双盲研究。
Lancet. 2011 Mar 5;377(9768):813-22. doi: 10.1016/S0140-6736(10)62344-6. Epub 2011 Feb 25.
4
Randomized, double-blind study of denosumab versus zoledronic acid in the treatment of bone metastases in patients with advanced cancer (excluding breast and prostate cancer) or multiple myeloma.随机、双盲研究地舒单抗与唑来膦酸治疗晚期癌症(不包括乳腺癌和前列腺癌)或多发性骨髓瘤患者的骨转移。
J Clin Oncol. 2011 Mar 20;29(9):1125-32. doi: 10.1200/JCO.2010.31.3304. Epub 2011 Feb 22.
5
Denosumab compared with zoledronic acid for the treatment of bone metastases in patients with advanced breast cancer: a randomized, double-blind study.地舒单抗对比唑来膦酸治疗晚期乳腺癌骨转移患者的随机、双盲研究。
J Clin Oncol. 2010 Dec 10;28(35):5132-9. doi: 10.1200/JCO.2010.29.7101. Epub 2010 Nov 8.
6
Medication compliance and persistence: terminology and definitions.药物依从性和持续性:术语与定义。
Value Health. 2008 Jan-Feb;11(1):44-7. doi: 10.1111/j.1524-4733.2007.00213.x.
7
The significance of skeletal-related events for the health-related quality of life of patients with metastatic prostate cancer.骨相关事件对转移性前列腺癌患者健康相关生活质量的意义。
Ann Oncol. 2005 Apr;16(4):579-84. doi: 10.1093/annonc/mdi122. Epub 2005 Feb 25.
8
Safety and pain palliation of zoledronic acid in patients with breast cancer, prostate cancer, or multiple myeloma who previously received bisphosphonate therapy.唑来膦酸对先前接受过双膦酸盐治疗的乳腺癌、前列腺癌或多发性骨髓瘤患者的安全性及疼痛缓解作用。
Oncologist. 2004;9(6):687-95. doi: 10.1634/theoncologist.9-6-687.
9
Bisphosphonates: clinical experience.双膦酸盐类药物:临床经验
Oncologist. 2004;9 Suppl 4:14-27. doi: 10.1634/theoncologist.9-90004-14.