Northwestern University Feinberg School of Medicine, Chicago, Illinois.
Brigham and Women's Hospital, Boston, Massachusetts.
Arthritis Care Res (Hoboken). 2020 Oct;72(10):1481-1489. doi: 10.1002/acr.24036.
Nonwhite racial/ethnic groups remain underrepresented in rheumatic disease-related research, despite being disproportionately affected by these disorders. Our objective was to systematically review the literature regarding underrepresented patients' perceptions of participation in rheumatic disease research and to develop strategies to improve diversity.
A systematic search of Embase, PubMed/Medline, PsycINFO, and Cochrane was performed through October 2018. Two independent reviewers identified 642 unique studies; 7 met inclusion criteria (peer-reviewed articles, published in English in the last 20 years, adult population, and with a focus on underrepresented patients' participation in rheumatic research). Five coauthors provided final approval of included articles. Data abstraction was performed, and common themes and key differences were determined and adjudicated.
The 7 articles included (n = 1,892 patients, range per article 20-961) evaluated factors associated with research participation of underrepresented populations. Five articles were related to lupus and 2 to rheumatoid arthritis, and 5 focused on African American patients and 1 on Hispanic patients. Five of the studies provided quantitative data through surveys (n = 3) and chart review (n = 2), while 2 used qualitative analyses. Key themes regarding underrepresented patients' perceptions of participating in research included: 1) the importance of trust in the patient- physician relationship, 2) the understanding of heterogeneity within and between ethnic groups, 3) the need for authentic academic-community partnerships, and 4) the implications of strict inclusion criteria on study participant diversity.
Limited evidence exists regarding underrepresented patients' attitudes toward research participation in rheumatology, and further investigation is warranted. The themes identified provide a starting point for future interventions that promote increased diversity in rheumatic disease-related research studies.
尽管非白人群体受风湿性疾病的影响不成比例,但他们在风湿性疾病相关研究中的代表性仍然不足。我们的目的是系统地回顾文献,了解代表性不足的患者对参与风湿性疾病研究的看法,并制定改善多样性的策略。
通过 2018 年 10 月对 Embase、PubMed/Medline、PsycINFO 和 Cochrane 进行了系统搜索。两名独立的审查员确定了 642 项独特的研究;符合纳入标准的有 7 项(同行评议文章,在过去 20 年中以英文发表,成人人群,重点关注代表性不足的患者参与风湿研究)。五位合著者对纳入的文章进行了最终批准。进行了数据提取,并确定和裁决了共同的主题和关键差异。
7 篇文章(n = 1892 名患者,每篇文章范围为 20-961)评估了与代表性不足人群参与研究相关的因素。其中 5 篇与狼疮有关,2 篇与类风湿关节炎有关,5 篇重点关注非裔美国患者,1 篇关注西班牙裔患者。其中 5 项研究通过调查(n = 3)和图表审查(n = 2)提供了定量数据,而 2 项研究则使用了定性分析。关于代表性不足的患者对参与研究的看法的关键主题包括:1)对医患关系信任的重要性,2)对族裔群体内部和之间异质性的理解,3)对真实的学术-社区伙伴关系的需求,以及 4)严格纳入标准对研究参与者多样性的影响。
关于代表性不足的患者对风湿学研究参与态度的证据有限,需要进一步研究。确定的主题为促进风湿性疾病相关研究中多样性增加的未来干预措施提供了起点。