• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

用于评估针对痴呆症患者的身体活动干预的核心结局集。

A Core Outcome Set to Evaluate Physical Activity Interventions for People Living With Dementia.

机构信息

School of Health Sciences, Faculty of Environmental and Life Sciences, University of Southampton, UK.

Research and Development, Solent NHS Trust, Southampton, UK.

出版信息

Gerontologist. 2020 May 15;60(4):682-692. doi: 10.1093/geront/gnz100.

DOI:10.1093/geront/gnz100
PMID:31350898
Abstract

BACKGROUND AND OBJECTIVES

A core outcome set (COS) to evaluate physical activity (PA) interventions for people living with dementia is needed, as the development of guidelines is currently limited by important heterogeneity in this field of research. Development of COS often includes Delphi surveys, but people living with dementia are often excluded. This study aimed to reach consensus on this COS using a modified Delphi survey to enable the participation of people living with dementia.

RESEARCH DESIGN AND METHODS

Two stakeholders groups took part in a Delphi survey (Group 1: people living with dementia and family caregivers; Group 2: professionals from different backgrounds, including physiotherapists, occupational therapists, and researchers). Caregivers and professionals completed the survey remotely. Participants living with dementia took part face-to-face, using a card sorting strategy. The consensus process was finalized with a consensus meeting.

RESULTS

Ninety-five participants of both groups completed the modified Delphi. Of those, 11 attended the consensus meeting. The card sorting strategy was successful at including people living with dementia. Seven outcomes reached consensus: preventing falls; doing what you can do; staying healthy and fit; walking better, being able to stand up and climb stairs; feeling brighter; enjoying the moment; and, feeling useful and having a purpose.

DISCUSSION AND IMPLICATIONS

Robust and innovative methodological strategies were used to reach a consensus on a COS (what to measure) to evaluate PA for people living with dementia. Future work will focus on the selection of the most appropriate tools to measure these outcomes (how to measure).

摘要

背景与目的

需要制定一个针对痴呆症患者的体力活动(PA)干预措施的核心结局集(COS),因为该领域的研究存在重要的异质性,目前指南的制定受到限制。COS 的制定通常包括德尔菲调查,但往往排除了痴呆症患者。本研究旨在通过一项修改后的德尔菲调查达成共识,使痴呆症患者能够参与其中。

研究设计与方法

两组利益相关者(Group 1:痴呆症患者和家庭照顾者;Group 2:来自不同背景的专业人员,包括物理治疗师、职业治疗师和研究人员)参与了德尔菲调查。照顾者和专业人员远程完成调查。痴呆症患者通过卡片分类策略面对面参与。共识过程最终通过共识会议确定。

结果

两组共有 95 名参与者完成了修改后的德尔菲调查,其中 11 名参加了共识会议。卡片分类策略成功地包括了痴呆症患者。有 7 个结果达成共识:预防跌倒;做力所能及的事;保持健康和体能;走得更好,能够站立和爬楼梯;感觉更愉快;享受当下;以及,感觉有用和有目标。

讨论与意义

采用了稳健和创新的方法策略,就评估痴呆症患者 PA 的 COS(测量什么)达成了共识。未来的工作将侧重于选择最合适的工具来衡量这些结果(如何衡量)。

相似文献

1
A Core Outcome Set to Evaluate Physical Activity Interventions for People Living With Dementia.用于评估针对痴呆症患者的身体活动干预的核心结局集。
Gerontologist. 2020 May 15;60(4):682-692. doi: 10.1093/geront/gnz100.
2
Developing a core outcome set for people living with dementia at home in their neighbourhoods and communities: study protocol for use in the evaluation of non-pharmacological community-based health and social care interventions.为居家社区中的痴呆症患者制定核心结局集:用于评估基于社区的非药物健康和社会护理干预措施的研究方案
Trials. 2018 Apr 24;19(1):247. doi: 10.1186/s13063-018-2584-9.
3
Selecting Core Outcomes for Randomised Effectiveness trials In Type 2 diabetes (SCORE-IT): a patient and healthcare professional consensus on a core outcome set for type 2 diabetes.选择 2 型糖尿病随机有效性试验的核心结局指标(SCORE-IT):2 型糖尿病核心结局集的患者和医疗保健专业人员共识。
BMJ Open Diabetes Res Care. 2019 Dec 29;7(1):e000700. doi: 10.1136/bmjdrc-2019-000700. eCollection 2019.
4
European Society of Coloproctology Core Outcome Set for haemorrhoidal disease: an international Delphi study among healthcare professionals.欧洲肛肠病学会痔病核心结局集:一项针对医疗保健专业人员的国际 Delphi 研究。
Colorectal Dis. 2019 May;21(5):570-580. doi: 10.1111/codi.14553. Epub 2019 Feb 8.
5
Cauda Equina Syndrome Core Outcome Set (CESCOS): An international patient and healthcare professional consensus for research studies.马尾综合征核心结局集(CESCOS):用于研究的国际患者和医疗保健专业人员共识。
PLoS One. 2020 Jan 10;15(1):e0225907. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0225907. eCollection 2020.
6
Developing a core outcome set for interventions to improve discharge from mental health inpatient services: a survey, Delphi and consensus meeting with key stakeholder groups.制定改善精神科住院服务出院干预的核心结局集:一项对关键利益相关者群体进行调查、德尔菲法和共识会议的研究。
BMJ Open. 2020 May 12;10(5):e034215. doi: 10.1136/bmjopen-2019-034215.
7
The development of a Core Outcome Set for medicines management interventions for people with dementia in primary care.制定核心结局集用于初级医疗中痴呆患者的药物管理干预措施。
Age Ageing. 2019 Mar 1;48(2):260-266. doi: 10.1093/ageing/afy172.
8
What is important to people living with dementia?: the 'long-list' of outcome items in the development of a core outcome set for use in the evaluation of non-pharmacological community-based health and social care interventions.对患有痴呆症的人来说重要的是什么?:在开发用于评估非药物性基于社区的健康和社会护理干预措施的核心结局集的过程中,“长列表”结局指标。
BMC Geriatr. 2019 Mar 27;19(1):94. doi: 10.1186/s12877-019-1103-5.
9
Involving people living with dementia in research: an accessible modified Delphi survey for core outcome set development.让痴呆症患者参与研究:一项用于核心结局集开发的可及性改良德尔菲调查。
Trials. 2019 Jan 6;20(1):12. doi: 10.1186/s13063-018-3069-6.
10
Protocol for the development of a core outcome set for pelvic girdle pain, including methods for measuring the outcomes: the PGP-COS study.骨盆带疼痛核心结局集制定方案,包括结局测量方法:PGP-COS 研究。
BMC Med Res Methodol. 2018 Dec 3;18(1):158. doi: 10.1186/s12874-018-0624-5.

引用本文的文献

1
James Lind Alliance Priority Setting Partnership in co-existing dementia and hearing conditions: a research agenda defined by people with lived experience and healthcare professionals.詹姆斯·林德联盟在并存的痴呆症和听力疾病方面的优先事项设定伙伴关系:由有实际经验的人和医疗保健专业人员确定的研究议程。
Age Ageing. 2025 Jul 1;54(7). doi: 10.1093/ageing/afaf191.
2
The effect of the APOE4 genotype on physiological and cognitive health in randomised controlled trials with an exercise intervention: a systematic review and meta-analysis.在有运动干预的随机对照试验中,APOE4基因型对生理和认知健康的影响:一项系统评价和荟萃分析。
Trials. 2025 Jan 20;26(1):20. doi: 10.1186/s13063-024-08696-4.
3
Evaluation of Digital Interventions for Physical Activity Promotion: Scoping Review.
数字干预措施在促进身体活动中的评估:范围综述。
JMIR Public Health Surveill. 2022 May 23;8(5):e37820. doi: 10.2196/37820.
4
A core outcome set for randomised controlled trials of physical activity interventions: development and challenges.体育活动干预随机对照试验的核心结局指标集:制定与挑战
BMC Public Health. 2022 Feb 24;22(1):389. doi: 10.1186/s12889-022-12600-7.
5
Outcomes valued by people living with dementia and their care partners: protocol for a qualitative systematic review and synthesis.患有痴呆症的人和他们的照护者重视的结果:一项定性系统评价和综合的方案。
BMJ Open. 2021 Aug 19;11(8):e050909. doi: 10.1136/bmjopen-2021-050909.
6
Physical activity for people living with dementia: carer outcomes and side effects from the perspectives of professionals and family carers.患有痴呆症的人的身体活动:从专业人员和家庭照顾者的角度来看照顾者的结果和副作用。
Aging Clin Exp Res. 2021 May;33(5):1267-1274. doi: 10.1007/s40520-020-01636-7. Epub 2020 Jul 3.
7
A Core Outcome Set for Nonpharmacological Community-Based Interventions for People Living With Dementia at Home: A Systematic Review of Outcome Measurement Instruments.用于居家老年痴呆症患者的非药物社区干预的核心结局集:结局测量工具的系统评价。
Gerontologist. 2021 Nov 15;61(8):e435-e448. doi: 10.1093/geront/gnaa071.