Harding Andrew J E, Morbey Hazel, Ahmed Faraz, Opdebeeck Carol, Wang Ying-Ying, Williamson Paula, Swarbrick Caroline, Leroi Iracema, Challis David, Davies Linda, Reeves David, Holland Fiona, Hann Mark, Hellström Ingrid, Hydén Lars-Christer, Burns Alistair, Keady John, Reilly Siobhan
Lancaster University, Lancaster, UK.
Manchester Metropolitan University, Manchester, UK.
Trials. 2018 Apr 24;19(1):247. doi: 10.1186/s13063-018-2584-9.
The key aim of the study is to establish an agreed standardised core outcome set (COS) for use when evaluating non-pharmacological health and social care interventions for people living at home with dementia.
METHODS/DESIGN: Drawing on the guidance and approaches of the Core Outcome Measures in Effectiveness Trials (COMET), this study uses a four-phase mixed-methods design: 1 Focus groups and interviews with key stakeholder groups (people living with dementia, care partners, relevant health and social care professionals, researchers and policymakers) and a review of the literature will be undertaken to build a long list of outcomes. 2 Two rounds of Delphi surveys will be used with key stakeholder groups. Statements for the Delphi surveys and participation processes will be developed and informed through substantial member involvement with people living with dementia and care partners. A consensus meeting will be convened with key participant groups to discuss the key findings and finalise the COS. 3 A systematic literature review will be undertaken to assess the properties of tools and instruments to assess components of the COS. Measurement properties, validity and reliability will be assessed using the Consensus-based Standards for the Selection of Health Measurement (COSMIN) and COMET guidance. 4 A stated preference survey will elicit the preferences of key stakeholders for the outcomes identified as important to measure in the COS.
To the best of our knowledge, this study is the first to use a modified Delphi process to involve people living with dementia as a participant group. Though the study is confined to collecting data in the United Kingdom, use of the COS by researchers will enhance the comparability of studies evaluating non-pharmacological and community-based interventions.
The study is registered on the COMET initiative, registered in 2014 at comet-initiative.org .
本研究的主要目的是建立一个商定的标准化核心结局集(COS),用于评估针对居家痴呆患者的非药物健康和社会护理干预措施。
方法/设计:借鉴有效性试验核心结局指标(COMET)的指导意见和方法,本研究采用四阶段混合方法设计:1. 将与关键利益相关者群体(痴呆患者、护理伙伴、相关健康和社会护理专业人员、研究人员和政策制定者)进行焦点小组讨论和访谈,并对文献进行综述,以列出一长串结局指标。2. 将与关键利益相关者群体进行两轮德尔菲调查。德尔菲调查的陈述和参与过程将通过痴呆患者和护理伙伴的大量参与来制定和完善。将与关键参与群体召开共识会议,讨论关键结果并确定核心结局集。3. 将进行系统的文献综述,以评估用于评估核心结局集各组成部分的工具和仪器的特性。将使用基于共识的健康测量选择标准(COSMIN)和COMET指南评估测量特性、有效性和可靠性。4. 一项陈述偏好调查将征求关键利益相关者对核心结局集中确定为重要测量指标的结局的偏好。
据我们所知,本研究是首次使用改良德尔菲法将痴呆患者作为参与群体纳入研究。尽管该研究仅限于在英国收集数据,但研究人员使用核心结局集将提高评估非药物和社区干预措施的研究的可比性。
该研究已在COMET计划中注册,于2014年在comet-initiative.org上注册。