Kanya Piyapong, Rattarittamrong Ekarat, Wongtakan Ornkamon, Rattanathammethee Thanawat, Chai-Adisaksopha Chatree, Tantiworawit Adisak, Norrasethada Lalita
Department of Internal Medicine, Chiang Rai Prachanukroh Hospital, Chiang Rai, Thailand.
Division of Hematology, Department of Internal Medicine, Faculty of Medicine, Chiang Mai University, Chiang Rai, Thailand. Email:
Asian Pac J Cancer Prev. 2019 Jul 1;20(7):2079-2085. doi: 10.31557/APJCP.2019.20.7.2079.
Background: The prognosis and management of primary thrombocytosis (PT) and secondary thrombocytosis (ST) are different. This study aims to evaluate the role of platelet function tests by light transmission platelet aggregometry (LTA), plasma von Willebrand factor antigen (vWF:Ag), ristocetin cofactor activity (vWF:RCo) and inflammatory markers [erythrocyte sedimentation rate (ESR), C-reactive protein (CRP)] for the differentiation between PT and ST. Methods: This prospective study was carried out in patients with platelet counts greater than 450 x 109/L. Primary outcomes were the sensitivity and specificity of platelet function tests by LTA for the differentiation of PT and ST. Secondary outcomes were sensitivity and specificity of ESR, CRP, vWF:Ag, and vWF:RCo for the differentiation of PT and ST. Results: Fifty-two patients were enrolled onto the study of which 26 (50%) had PT. The sensitivity and specificity of epinephrine, collagen, and arachidonic acid (AA) induced abnormal LTA for the differentiation of PT from ST were sensitivity of 50%, 38.5%, 26.9% and specificity of 88.5%, 100%, 100% respectively. The sensitivity and specificity of abnormal ESR, CRP, and either abnormal ESR or CRP in the differentiation of ST from PT were sensitivity of 88.5%, 80.8%, 100% and specificity of 65.4%, 61.5%, 46.2% respectively. The sensitivity and specificity of low vWF:Ag and vWF:RCo in the differentiation of PT from ST were sensitivity of 7.69%, 42.3% and specificity of 100%, 88.5% respectively. Conclusions: Abnormal platelet function determined by LTA with collagen, AA, epinephrine had high specificity ratings enabling the differentiation between PT and ST. vWF:RCo, ESR and CRP levels could be helpful in differentiating between PT and ST.
原发性血小板增多症(PT)和继发性血小板增多症(ST)的预后及管理有所不同。本研究旨在评估通过光透射血小板聚集试验(LTA)、血浆血管性血友病因子抗原(vWF:Ag)、瑞斯托霉素辅因子活性(vWF:RCo)以及炎症标志物[红细胞沉降率(ESR)、C反应蛋白(CRP)]进行血小板功能检测在区分PT和ST中的作用。方法:本前瞻性研究针对血小板计数大于450×10⁹/L的患者开展。主要结局是LTA血小板功能检测在区分PT和ST方面的敏感性和特异性。次要结局是ESR、CRP、vWF:Ag和vWF:RCo在区分PT和ST方面的敏感性和特异性。结果:52例患者纳入本研究,其中26例(50%)患有PT。肾上腺素、胶原和花生四烯酸(AA)诱导的LTA异常用于区分PT和ST的敏感性分别为50%、38.5%、26.9%,特异性分别为88.5%、100%、100%。ESR异常、CRP异常以及ESR或CRP异常在区分ST和PT方面的敏感性分别为88.5%、80.8%、100%,特异性分别为65.4%、61.5%、46.2%。低vWF:Ag和vWF:RCo在区分PT和ST方面的敏感性分别为7.69%、42.3%,特异性分别为100%、88.5%。结论:LTA检测胶原、AA、肾上腺素时血小板功能异常具有较高的特异性评分,有助于区分PT和ST。vWF:RCo、ESR和CRP水平有助于区分PT和ST。