• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

相似文献

1
Assessment of different temporary immersion systems in the micropropagation of anthurium ().不同临时浸没系统在红掌微繁殖中的评估()。 (注:原文括号处内容缺失,翻译只能到此为止)
3 Biotech. 2019 Aug;9(8):307. doi: 10.1007/s13205-019-1833-2. Epub 2019 Jul 26.
2
Micropropagation of (Bateman) Dressler et W. E. Higging in Temporary Immersion Systems.(贝特曼)德雷斯勒与W. E. 希金在临时浸没系统中的微繁殖
3 Biotech. 2020 Jan;10(1):26. doi: 10.1007/s13205-019-2010-3. Epub 2020 Jan 3.
3
Temporary immersion systems induce photomixotrophism during in vitro propagation of agave Tobalá.临时浸没系统在托巴拉龙舌兰的离体繁殖过程中诱导光合混合营养。
3 Biotech. 2024 Mar;14(3):74. doi: 10.1007/s13205-024-03928-5. Epub 2024 Feb 14.
4
Comparison of conventional and temporary immersion systems on micropropagation (multiplication phase) of ''.常规培养系统与临时浸没培养系统对‘’微繁殖(增殖阶段)的比较
3 Biotech. 2021 Feb;11(2):77. doi: 10.1007/s13205-020-02604-8. Epub 2021 Jan 15.
5
A temporary immersion system for mass micropropagation of pitahaya ().一种用于火龙果大规模微繁殖的临时浸没系统。
3 Biotech. 2021 Oct;11(10):437. doi: 10.1007/s13205-021-02984-5. Epub 2021 Sep 17.
6
Comparison of Different Semi-Automated Bioreactors for In Vitro Propagation of Taro ( L. Schott).用于芋头(L. Schott)离体繁殖的不同半自动生物反应器的比较
Plants (Basel). 2021 May 19;10(5):1010. doi: 10.3390/plants10051010.
7
A Temporary Immersion System to Improve Micropropagation.一种用于改进微繁殖的临时浸没系统。
Front Plant Sci. 2022 Jun 23;13:895971. doi: 10.3389/fpls.2022.895971. eCollection 2022.
8
A novel temporary immersion bioreactor system for large scale multiplication of banana (Rasthali AAB-Silk).一种新型的大型临时沉浸生物反应器系统,用于香蕉(Rasthali AAB-Silk)的大规模繁殖。
Sci Rep. 2021 Oct 13;11(1):20371. doi: 10.1038/s41598-021-99923-4.
9
Temporary Immersion Systems in Plant Micropropagation.植物微繁殖中的临时浸没系统。
Methods Mol Biol. 2024;2759:3-8. doi: 10.1007/978-1-0716-3654-1_1.
10
In Vitro Regeneration of L. by Using a Temporary Immersion System.利用临时浸没系统对[植物名称未明确,推测为某种植物属名L.]进行离体再生
Plants (Basel). 2019 Jun 16;8(6):177. doi: 10.3390/plants8060177.

引用本文的文献

1
Chromosome-level genome assembly and annotation of Anthurium amnicola.安祖花(Anthurium amnicola)的染色体水平基因组组装与注释
Sci Data. 2025 Apr 10;12(1):605. doi: 10.1038/s41597-025-04939-4.
2
Increased Multiplication Rates of Vriesea hieroglyphica (Carriere) E. Morren Through a Temporary Immersion System.通过临时浸泡系统提高 Vriesea hieroglyphica(Carriere)E. Morren 的繁殖率。
Methods Mol Biol. 2024;2759:131-136. doi: 10.1007/978-1-0716-3654-1_12.
3
Temporary Immersion Systems in Plant Micropropagation.植物微繁殖中的临时浸没系统。
Methods Mol Biol. 2024;2759:3-8. doi: 10.1007/978-1-0716-3654-1_1.
4
A novel temporary immersion bioreactor system for large scale multiplication of banana (Rasthali AAB-Silk).一种新型的大型临时沉浸生物反应器系统,用于香蕉(Rasthali AAB-Silk)的大规模繁殖。
Sci Rep. 2021 Oct 13;11(1):20371. doi: 10.1038/s41598-021-99923-4.
5
Comparison of Different Semi-Automated Bioreactors for In Vitro Propagation of Taro ( L. Schott).用于芋头(L. Schott)离体繁殖的不同半自动生物反应器的比较
Plants (Basel). 2021 May 19;10(5):1010. doi: 10.3390/plants10051010.
6
Comparison of conventional and temporary immersion systems on micropropagation (multiplication phase) of ''.常规培养系统与临时浸没培养系统对‘’微繁殖(增殖阶段)的比较
3 Biotech. 2021 Feb;11(2):77. doi: 10.1007/s13205-020-02604-8. Epub 2021 Jan 15.

本文引用的文献

1
Schisandra lignans production regulated by different bioreactor type.不同生物反应器类型对五味子木脂素产量的调控
J Biotechnol. 2017 Apr 10;247:11-17. doi: 10.1016/j.jbiotec.2017.02.007. Epub 2017 Feb 14.
2
Responses of leaf stomatal density to water status and its relationship with photosynthesis in a grass.一种禾本科植物叶片气孔密度对水分状况的响应及其与光合作用的关系
J Exp Bot. 2008;59(12):3317-25. doi: 10.1093/jxb/ern185. Epub 2008 Jul 22.

不同临时浸没系统在红掌微繁殖中的评估()。 (注:原文括号处内容缺失,翻译只能到此为止)

Assessment of different temporary immersion systems in the micropropagation of anthurium ().

作者信息

Ramírez-Mosqueda Marco A, Cruz-Cruz Carlos A, Cano-Ricárdez Adrián, Bello-Bello Jericó J

机构信息

Colegio de Postgraduados Campus Córdoba, Km. 348 de la Carretera Federal Córdoba-Veracruz, Amatlán de los Reyes, C.P. 94946 Veracruz Mexico.

2Facultad de Ciencias Biológicas y Agropecuarias, Universidad Veracruzana, C.P. 94945 Amatlán de los Reyes, Veracruz Mexico.

出版信息

3 Biotech. 2019 Aug;9(8):307. doi: 10.1007/s13205-019-1833-2. Epub 2019 Jul 26.

DOI:10.1007/s13205-019-1833-2
PMID:31355116
原文链接:https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC6660536/
Abstract

has been micropropagated mainly through conventional techniques in semisolid culture medium. However, this culture system involves constraints due to the low number of shoots produced and the high costs of the gelling agent and labor. Temporary immersion systems (TIS) are an alternative for increasing biological performance, reducing costs, and facilitating a semi-automated micropropagation process. The objective of this study was to compare the efficiency of different types of TIS during the in vitro propagation of anthurium. We used 2-cm-long nodal segments from in vitro plants. Explants were cultured in different TIS: temporary immersion bioreactors (TIB), Ebb-and-Flow bioreactor, and recipient for automated temporary immersion (RITA), with a 2-min immersion frequency at 12-h intervals. We used Murashige and Skoog (MS) medium supplemented with 3% (/) of sucrose and 8.88 µM benzylaminopurine. After 60 days of culture, we evaluated various physiological variables and the percent survival in the different TIS. The largest numbers of shoots per explant were observed in TIB and Ebb-and-Flow, with 50.83 and 43.16 shoots per explant, respectively; the lowest number of shoots per explant was observed in RITA, with 30.66. TIB yielded the highest content of photosynthetic pigments (chlorophyll a, b, and total chlorophyll), stomatal index, and percentage of closed stomata relative to both Ebb-and-Flow and RITA. The TIB and RITA systems showed a 99% shoot survival, while Ebb-and-Flow yielded 86% survival. In conclusion, TIS design and type affect a number of physiological processes and in vitro development, with TIB as a feasible option for the commercial micropropagation of anthurium.

摘要

主要通过在半固体培养基中采用传统技术进行了红掌的微繁殖。然而,这种培养系统存在一些限制,因为产生的芽数量少,且凝胶剂和劳动力成本高。临时浸没系统(TIS)是提高生物学性能、降低成本并促进半自动微繁殖过程的一种替代方法。本研究的目的是比较不同类型的TIS在红掌离体繁殖过程中的效率。我们使用了来自离体植株的2厘米长的节段。外植体在不同的TIS中培养:临时浸没生物反应器(TIB)、潮汐式生物反应器和自动临时浸没容器(RITA),浸没频率为2分钟,间隔12小时。我们使用添加了3%(/)蔗糖和8.88µM苄氨基嘌呤的Murashige和Skoog(MS)培养基。培养60天后,我们评估了不同TIS中的各种生理变量和存活率。在TIB和潮汐式生物反应器中观察到每个外植体的芽数量最多,分别为每个外植体50.83个和43.16个芽;在RITA中观察到每个外植体的芽数量最少,为30.66个。相对于潮汐式生物反应器和RITA,TIB产生的光合色素(叶绿素a、b和总叶绿素)含量、气孔指数和气孔关闭百分比最高。TIB和RITA系统的芽存活率为99%,而潮汐式生物反应器的存活率为86%。总之,TIS的设计和类型影响许多生理过程和离体发育,TIB是红掌商业微繁殖的可行选择。