Siril Hellen, Kaale Anna, Minja Anna, Kilewo Japheth, Mugusi Ferdinand, Sunguya Bruno, Todd Jim, Kaaya Sylvia, Smith Fawzi Mary C
Department of Psychiatry and Mental Health, Muhimbili University of Health and Allied Sciences, Dar es Salaam, Tanzania.
Department of Public Health Evaluations and Quality Improvement, Management and Development for Health, Dar es Salaam, Tanzania.
Cogent Med. 2019;6. doi: 10.1080/2331205X.2019.1600230. Epub 2019 Mar 31.
Although a number of HIV prevention programs have been implemented, such as mass media campaigns, high rates of unprotected and concurrent sexual partnerships, as well as low uptake HIV testing and limited HIV knowledge, persist in Tanzania. We examined the effect and predicting factors of HIV prevention communication among people living with HIV (PLH) exposed to intervention, and their at-risk social network members (NMs) Quantitative data were collected from 326 participants at baseline and 24 months of follow-up. In-depth interviews with 20 PLH were conducted at follow-up. Results indicated specific communication about condom use and HIV testing increased; (mean increase of 0.28 (SD = 0.14) scores, P = 0.012 and 0.42 (SD = 0.11) scores, p < 0.001 respectively while general discussion about protecting other people from HIV did not change significantly; mean increase was 0.01 scores (SD = 0.005), p = 0.890. Positive predictors of communication included being single; OR = 1.10, p = 0.01, female; OR = 1.15, p = 0.03, aged 30 years or older; OR = 1.23, p < 0.01, HIV knowledge, dose of participation; OR = 1.01, p < 0.001, and high self-efficacy for condom use; OR = 1.4, p < 0.001. Stigma demonstrated a significant but negative association with communication for condom use; OR = 1.01, p < 0.01.Qualitative data reflected perceived possession of more individual skills and ability to address some personal/cultural obstacles to communicating about HIV prevention including those observed in the quantitative data. improved communication about HIV prevention among PLH with their at-risk-NMs. The approach is a promising complement to media campaigns in similar populations. Future research and program evaluation efforts should explore how communities perceive and communicate about protecting others from HIV.
尽管坦桑尼亚已经实施了一些艾滋病毒预防项目,如大众媒体宣传活动,但不安全和同时存在的性伙伴关系比例仍然很高,艾滋病毒检测率低以及艾滋病毒知识有限的情况依然存在。我们研究了艾滋病毒预防宣传对接受干预的艾滋病毒感染者(PLH)及其高危社会网络成员(NMs)的影响及预测因素。在基线和随访24个月时从326名参与者收集了定量数据。随访时对20名艾滋病毒感染者进行了深入访谈。结果表明,关于避孕套使用和艾滋病毒检测的具体宣传有所增加;(得分平均增加0.28(标准差=0.14),P=0.012和0.42(标准差=0.11),p<0.001),而关于保护他人免受艾滋病毒感染的一般性讨论没有显著变化;平均增加0.01分(标准差=0.005),p=0.890。沟通的积极预测因素包括单身;比值比=1.10,p=0.01,女性;比值比=1.15,p=0.03,年龄30岁及以上;比值比=1.23,p<0.01,艾滋病毒知识,参与剂量;比值比=1.01,p<0.001,以及使用避孕套的自我效能感高;比值比=1.4,p<0.001。耻辱感与避孕套使用沟通呈显著负相关;比值比=1.01,p<0.01。定性数据反映出人们认为自己拥有更多个人技能,并有能力克服一些在艾滋病毒预防沟通方面的个人/文化障碍,包括定量数据中观察到的那些障碍。改善了艾滋病毒感染者与其高危网络成员之间关于艾滋病毒预防的沟通。该方法是类似人群中媒体宣传活动的一个有前景的补充。未来的研究和项目评估工作应探讨社区如何看待和沟通保护他人免受艾滋病毒感染的问题。