• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

空气抛光联合手动器械或超声器械产生的根面粗糙度比较:一项体外研究。

Comparison of root surface roughness produced by air polishing combined with hand instrumentation or ultrasonic instrumentation: an in vitro study.

作者信息

Poornima Rajendran, Meena Anand Kukkamalla, Pratibha G

出版信息

Gen Dent. 2019 Jul-Aug;67(4):75-77.

PMID:31355770
Abstract

The aim of this study was to examine the surface roughness produced by root debridement during periodontal maintenance therapy. The root surface roughness produced by hand scaling and subsequent glycine powder air polishing (GPAP) was compared with that produced by ultrasonic scaling and subsequent GPAP. Fifty extracted incisor and premolar teeth were collected and randomly allocated to the following 5 groups (n = 10 per group): 1, hand scaling followed by GPAP; 2, ultrasonic scaling followed by GPAP; 3, hand scaling alone; 4, ultrasonic scaling alone; and 5, no treatment. After the initial scaling procedure, specimens in groups 1 and 2 were incubated at 37°C for 3 days. The specimens then underwent GPAP for 5 seconds. All specimens were examined under a profilometer, and the root surface roughness was measured in micrometers. The specimens in groups 1 (hand scaling with GPAP) and 2 (ultrasonic scaling with GPAP) were studied in detail under a scanning electron microscope. The different protocols produced the following mean root surface roughness values: group 1, 2.31 µm; group 2, 4.33 µm; group 3, 5.84 µm; group 4, 6.32 µm; and group 5, 9.20 µm. The difference between groups 1 and 2 was statistically significant (P < 0.05). In this in vitro study, hand scaling with curettes produced smoother root surfaces than ultrasonic scaling. Adjunctive use of GPAP for 5 seconds along with hand scaling or ultrasonic scaling resulted in improved root surface smoothness during periodontal maintenance therapy.

摘要

本研究的目的是检查牙周维护治疗期间根面清创所产生的表面粗糙度。将手工洁治及后续甘氨酸粉末空气抛光(GPAP)所产生的根面粗糙度与超声洁治及后续GPAP所产生的根面粗糙度进行比较。收集50颗拔除的切牙和前磨牙,随机分为以下5组(每组n = 10):1组,手工洁治后进行GPAP;2组,超声洁治后进行GPAP;3组,单纯手工洁治;4组,单纯超声洁治;5组,不进行处理。在初始洁治程序后,第1组和第2组的标本在37°C下孵育3天。然后对标本进行5秒的GPAP处理。所有标本均在轮廓仪下检查,并以微米为单位测量根面粗糙度。在扫描电子显微镜下对第1组(手工洁治加GPAP)和第2组(超声洁治加GPAP)的标本进行详细研究。不同方案产生的平均根面粗糙度值如下:第1组为2.31 µm;第2组为4.33 µm;第3组为5.84 µm;第4组为6.32 µm;第5组为9.20 µm。第1组和第2组之间的差异具有统计学意义(P < 0.05)。在这项体外研究中,用刮治器进行手工洁治比超声洁治产生的根面更光滑。在牙周维护治疗期间,将GPAP与手工洁治或超声洁治联合使用5秒可改善根面光滑度。

相似文献

1
Comparison of root surface roughness produced by air polishing combined with hand instrumentation or ultrasonic instrumentation: an in vitro study.空气抛光联合手动器械或超声器械产生的根面粗糙度比较:一项体外研究。
Gen Dent. 2019 Jul-Aug;67(4):75-77.
2
Efficacy of glycine powder air polishing in comparison with sodium bicarbonate air polishing and ultrasonic scaling - a double-blind clinico-histopathologic study.甘氨酸粉末空气抛光与碳酸氢钠空气抛光及超声洁治的疗效比较——一项双盲临床病理研究。
Int J Dent Hyg. 2015 Aug;13(3):177-83. doi: 10.1111/idh.12133. Epub 2015 Feb 26.
3
Evaluation of root surface microtopography following the use of four instrumentation systems by confocal microscopy and scanning electron microscopy: an in vitro study.应用共聚焦显微镜和扫描电子显微镜评估四种根管预备器械系统对根管表面微观形貌的影响:一项体外研究。
J Periodontal Res. 2012 Oct;47(5):608-15. doi: 10.1111/j.1600-0765.2012.01473.x. Epub 2012 Apr 12.
4
Root surface alterations following manual and mechanical scaling: A comparative study.手工和机械洁治后的牙根表面改变:一项对比研究。
Int J Dent Hyg. 2018 Nov;16(4):553-558. doi: 10.1111/idh.12349. Epub 2018 May 25.
5
Effect of glycine powder air-polishing on the gingiva.甘氨酸粉末空气抛光对牙龈的影响。
J Clin Periodontol. 2008 Apr;35(4):324-32. doi: 10.1111/j.1600-051X.2007.01195.x. Epub 2008 Feb 20.
6
Comparison of the effect of sodium bicarbonate and glycine air polishing systems on tooth surface roughness: An atomic force microscopic analysis.碳酸氢钠和甘氨酸空气喷砂系统对牙面粗糙度影响的比较:原子力显微镜分析。
Technol Health Care. 2021;29(3):489-498. doi: 10.3233/THC-202210.
7
Preservation of root cementum: a comparative evaluation of power-driven versus hand instruments.牙根骨质黏固剂的保存:电动器械与手动器械的对比评估
Int J Dent Hyg. 2018 May;16(2):202-209. doi: 10.1111/idh.12249. Epub 2016 Nov 16.
8
A comparative scanning electron microscopy study between the effect of an ultrasonic scaler, reciprocating handpiece, and combined approach on the root surface topography in subgingival debridement.超声洁牙机、往复式手机和联合方法在龈下刮治中对根面形貌影响的对比扫描电子显微镜研究。
Clin Exp Dent Res. 2020 Aug;6(4):470-477. doi: 10.1002/cre2.299. Epub 2020 Jun 22.
9
[Preliminary study of subgingival microorganism changes after glycine powder air-polishing treatment during periodontal maintenance phase].[牙周维护期甘氨酸粉末空气抛光治疗后龈下微生物变化的初步研究]
Zhonghua Kou Qiang Yi Xue Za Zhi. 2017 Jul 9;52(7):410-414. doi: 10.3760/cma.j.issn.1002-0098.2017.07.004.
10
In vitro evaluation of surface roughness, adhesion of periodontal ligament fibroblasts, and Streptococcus gordonii following root instrumentation with Gracey curettes and subsequent polishing with diamond-coated curettes.体外评价龈下Gracey 刮治器和随后使用金刚石涂层刮治器抛光后牙周膜成纤维细胞的表面粗糙度、黏附以及链球菌戈登的情况。
Clin Oral Investig. 2013 Mar;17(2):397-404. doi: 10.1007/s00784-012-0719-z. Epub 2012 Apr 17.

引用本文的文献

1
Subgingival Use of Air-Polishing Powders: Status of Knowledge: A Systematic Review.龈下使用空气抛光粉:知识现状:一项系统评价
J Clin Med. 2023 Nov 5;12(21):6936. doi: 10.3390/jcm12216936.
2
In Vitro Study of Surface Changes Induced on Enamel and Cementum by Different Scaling and Polishing Techniques.不同洁治与抛光技术对牙釉质和牙骨质表面影响的体外研究。
Oral Health Prev Dent. 2021 Jan 28;19:85-92. doi: 10.3290/j.ohpd.b927695.