Knapik Derrick M, Buschbach James, Sabharwal Sanjeev, Liu Raymond W
Orthopedics. 2019 Nov 1;42(6):e485-e491. doi: 10.3928/01477447-20190723-04. Epub 2019 Jul 29.
This review assesses the outcomes of hemiepiphysiodesis in patients with idiopathic genu valgum (IGV) treated with physeal staples vs tension-band plating (TBP). A systematic review of the literature was conducted to identify articles examining the use of physeal staples vs TBP for the treatment of IGV in skeletally immature patients. No significant difference in overall mean deformity correction (P=.92) or correction per month (P=.61) was observed between groups. Repeat hemiepiphysiodesis was more common in patients who underwent TBP vs physeal staples (P=.05). Tension-band plating did not yield significantly improved results compared with physeal staples in skeletally immature patients with IGV. [Orthopedics. 2019; 42(6):e485-e491.].
本综述评估了采用骨骺钉与张力带钢板(TBP)治疗特发性膝外翻(IGV)患者的半骨骺阻滞术的疗效。对文献进行了系统回顾,以确定研究在骨骼未成熟患者中使用骨骺钉与TBP治疗IGV的文章。两组之间在总体平均畸形矫正(P = 0.92)或每月矫正(P = 0.61)方面未观察到显著差异。与接受骨骺钉治疗的患者相比,接受TBP治疗的患者再次进行半骨骺阻滞术更为常见(P = 0.05)。在骨骼未成熟的IGV患者中,与骨骺钉相比,张力带钢板并未产生显著更好的效果。[《骨科学》。2019年;42(6):e485 - e491。]