Suppr超能文献

远程缺血预处理对非瓣膜性阵发性心房颤动电生理参数的影响:RIPPAF 随机临床试验。

Effect of remote ischemic preconditioning on electrophysiological parameters in nonvalvular paroxysmal atrial fibrillation: The RIPPAF Randomized Clinical Trial.

机构信息

Department of Electrophysiology, Heart Center Leipzig, University of Leipzig, Leipzig, Germany.

Department of Electrophysiology, Heart Center Leipzig, University of Leipzig, Leipzig, Germany.

出版信息

Heart Rhythm. 2020 Jan;17(1):3-9. doi: 10.1016/j.hrthm.2019.07.026. Epub 2019 Jul 26.

Abstract

BACKGROUND

Atrial fibrillation (AF) remains the most relevant arrhythmia with a prevalence of 2%. The treatment options are either highly invasive and cost-intensive or limited by potential side effects or insufficient efficacy. However, no direct means of prevention that could reduce the burden of AF have been tested.

OBJECTIVE

The purpose of this study was to determine whether remote ischemic preconditioning (RIPC) has an impact on inducibility and sustainability of AF.

METHODS

A total of 146 patients with paroxysmal AF undergoing electrophysiology study were randomized to receive either RIPC, performed by short episodes of forearm ischemia, or sham intervention (clinicaltrials.gov identifier: NCT02779660). Effective refractory periods, conduction times, velocities, and conduction delays measured were analyzed by pacing from the coronary sinus (CS). End points of the study were the inducibility and sustainability of AF after prespecified rapid pacing sequences.

RESULTS

RIPC significantly reduces the inducibility (odds ratio 0.35; 95% confidence interval 0.17-0.71; P = .003) and sustainability (odds ratio 0.36; 95% confidence interval 0.16-0.81; P = .01) of AF. Furthermore, it decreased dispersion of atrial refractory periods (16.0 ± 14.0 ms vs 22.7 ± 19.0 ms; P = .021) as well as atrial conduction delays (49.2 ± 19.6 ms vs 56.2 ± 22.5 ms; P = .049 for proximal CS and 42.4 ± 16.6 ms vs 49.8 ± 22.2 ms; P = .029 for distal CS). In the whole cohort, longer atrial conduction delay (57.6 ± 22.2 ms vs 50.0 ± 20.5 ms; P = .044) and slower conduction velocity (1.74 ± 0.3 mm/ms vs 1.93 ± 0.5 mm/ms; P = .006) were associated with inducibility of AF whereas a wider dispersion of effective refractory periods (25.9 ± 18.3 ms vs 15.7 ± 11.6 ms; P = .028) maintained AF episodes.

CONCLUSION

RIPC reduces the inducibility and sustainability of AF, which is possibly mediated by changes in electrophysiological properties of the atria. It may be used as a simple noninvasive procedure to reduce AF burden.

摘要

背景

心房颤动(AF)仍然是最相关的心律失常,患病率为 2%。治疗选择要么是高度侵入性和成本密集型,要么是受到潜在副作用或疗效不足的限制。然而,尚未测试任何可以降低 AF 负担的直接预防措施。

目的

本研究旨在确定远程缺血预处理(RIPC)是否对 AF 的可诱导性和持续性有影响。

方法

共纳入 146 例阵发性 AF 行电生理研究的患者,随机分为 RIPC 组(通过短暂的前臂缺血进行)或假手术组(临床研究标识:NCT02779660)。通过从冠状窦(CS)起搏来分析有效不应期、传导时间、速度和传导延迟。研究终点为预设快速起搏序列后 AF 的可诱导性和持续性。

结果

RIPC 可显著降低 AF 的可诱导性(比值比 0.35;95%置信区间 0.17-0.71;P =.003)和持续性(比值比 0.36;95%置信区间 0.16-0.81;P =.01)。此外,它还降低了心房不应期的离散度(16.0 ± 14.0 ms 与 22.7 ± 19.0 ms;P =.021)和心房传导延迟(49.2 ± 19.6 ms 与 56.2 ± 22.5 ms;P =.049 对于近端 CS 和 42.4 ± 16.6 ms 与 49.8 ± 22.2 ms;P =.029 对于远端 CS)。在整个队列中,较长的心房传导延迟(57.6 ± 22.2 ms 与 50.0 ± 20.5 ms;P =.044)和较慢的传导速度(1.74 ± 0.3 mm/ms 与 1.93 ± 0.5 mm/ms;P =.006)与 AF 的可诱导性相关,而有效不应期离散度的增加(25.9 ± 18.3 ms 与 15.7 ± 11.6 ms;P =.028)维持 AF 发作。

结论

RIPC 降低了 AF 的可诱导性和持续性,这可能是通过心房电生理特性的改变介导的。它可以作为一种简单的非侵入性程序,以降低 AF 的负担。

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验