Department of Biomedical Engineering, The City College of the City University of New York, New York, NY, USA.
Department of Biomedical Engineering, The City College of the City University of New York, New York, NY, USA.
Brain Stimul. 2019 Nov-Dec;12(6):1349-1366. doi: 10.1016/j.brs.2019.07.010. Epub 2019 Jul 17.
Transcranial electrical stimulation (tES) aims to alter brain function non-invasively by applying current to electrodes on the scalp. Decades of research and technological advancement are associated with a growing diversity of tES methods and the associated nomenclature for describing these methods. Whether intended to produce a specific response so the brain can be studied or lead to a more enduring change in behavior (e.g. for treatment), the motivations for using tES have themselves influenced the evolution of nomenclature, leading to some scientific, clinical, and public confusion. This ambiguity arises from (i) the infinite parameter space available in designing tES methods of application and (ii) varied naming conventions based upon the intended effects and/or methods of application. Here, we compile a cohesive nomenclature for contemporary tES technologies that respects existing and historical norms, while incorporating insight and classifications based on state-of-the-art findings. We consolidate and clarify existing terminology conventions, but do not aim to create new nomenclature. The presented nomenclature aims to balance adopting broad definitions that encourage flexibility and innovation in research approaches, against classification specificity that minimizes ambiguity about protocols but can hinder progress. Constructive research around tES classification, such as transcranial direct current stimulation (tDCS), should allow some variations in protocol but also distinguish from approaches that bear so little resemblance that their safety and efficacy should not be compared directly. The proposed framework includes terms in contemporary use across peer-reviewed publications, including relatively new nomenclature introduced in the past decade, such as transcranial alternating current stimulation (tACS) and transcranial pulsed current stimulation (tPCS), as well as terms with long historical use such as electroconvulsive therapy (ECT). We also define commonly used terms-of-the-trade including electrode, lead, anode, and cathode, whose prior use, in varied contexts, can also be a source of confusion. This comprehensive clarification of nomenclature and associated preliminary proposals for standardized terminology can support the development of consensus on efficacy, safety, and regulatory standards.
经颅电刺激(tES)通过将电流施加到头皮上的电极来非侵入性地改变大脑功能。几十年来的研究和技术进步与 tES 方法的日益多样化以及用于描述这些方法的相关命名法相关。无论其目的是产生特定的反应以便研究大脑,还是导致行为上更持久的变化(例如治疗),使用 tES 的动机本身也影响了命名法的演变,导致了一些科学、临床和公众的混淆。这种歧义源于 (i) 在设计 tES 应用方法时可用的无限参数空间,以及 (ii) 基于预期效果和/或应用方法的不同命名约定。在这里,我们为当代 tES 技术编制了一个连贯的命名法,既尊重现有的和历史上的规范,又结合了基于最先进发现的见解和分类。我们整合和澄清了现有的术语约定,但不是为了创造新的命名法。所提出的命名法旨在在鼓励研究方法的灵活性和创新性的广泛定义之间取得平衡,同时在协议分类的特异性方面取得平衡,以最大限度地减少协议的歧义,但又不会阻碍进展。围绕 tES 分类的建设性研究,例如经颅直流电刺激(tDCS),应该允许在协议上有一些变化,但也应该与那些相似之处很少以至于不能直接比较其安全性和有效性的方法区分开来。所提出的框架包括在同行评议的出版物中使用的术语,包括过去十年中引入的相对较新的命名法,例如经颅交流电刺激(tACS)和经颅脉冲电流刺激(tPCS),以及具有长期历史使用的术语,如电惊厥疗法(ECT)。我们还定义了常用的行业术语,包括电极、导联、阳极和阴极,它们在不同的上下文中的先前使用也可能是混淆的来源。这种对命名法的全面澄清以及对标准化术语的初步建议可以支持就疗效、安全性和监管标准达成共识。