Okano Kana, Lee Marissa Marko, Hart-Pomerantz Hannah, Smith Marisa, Sandone Madelyn K, Harvey Travis, Brunyé Tad T
Center for Applied Brain and Cognitive Sciences, Tufts University, Medford, MA, United States.
Teamworks Innovations Inc., Durham, NC, United States.
Front Hum Neurosci. 2025 Aug 13;19:1641801. doi: 10.3389/fnhum.2025.1641801. eCollection 2025.
Cranial electrotherapy stimulation (CES) is a low-intensity, pulsed neuromodulation technique widely marketed for reducing stress and anxiety. Despite its popularity, empirical evidence for its efficacy remains mixed, with few studies employing rigorous controls, standardized protocols, and repeated CES exposures.
To evaluate whether repeated CES sessions can attenuate physiological, biochemical, cognitive, and affective responses to an acute laboratory stressor.
A double-blind, randomized, placebo-controlled clinical trial was conducted with 46 healthy participants (27 military personnel, 19 civilians). Participants were randomized to receive either active CES (250-500 μA at 0.5Hz, individualized intensity) or sham stimulation for 20 sessions over approximately four weeks. At baseline and follow-up visits, participants underwent acute stress induction using torso shock; measures included physiological (heart rate, heart rate variability, respiration rate, pupil diameter), biochemical (salivary alpha-amylase, cortisol), cognitive (spatial orientation, recognition memory, decision-making), and affective (State-Trait Anxiety Inventory) indices.
Stress induction reliably elevated sympathetic-adrenal medulla (SAM) and hypothalamic-pituitary-adrenal (HPA) markers as well as subjective anxiety. However, across nearly all outcomes, active CES did not differ significantly from sham, nor were there interactions with session (baseline vs. follow-up). No meaningful group differences were observed in stress recovery, self-reported anxiety, or stress-related cognitive performance.
These predominantly null findings challenge prevailing mechanistic accounts of CES and suggest limited efficacy in buffering acute stress responses in healthy, neurotypical individuals. Further controlled trials are needed to explore alternative parameters, populations, and neurophysiological endpoints to better understand CES's therapeutic potential.
https://clinicaltrials.gov/, identifier NCT06034496.
颅部电刺激疗法(CES)是一种低强度的脉冲神经调节技术,在市场上广泛用于减轻压力和焦虑。尽管其很受欢迎,但其疗效的实证证据仍参差不齐,很少有研究采用严格的对照、标准化方案以及重复的CES暴露。
评估重复进行CES疗程是否能减轻对急性实验室应激源的生理、生化、认知和情感反应。
对46名健康参与者(27名军人,19名平民)进行了一项双盲、随机、安慰剂对照临床试验。参与者被随机分配接受主动CES(0.5赫兹下250 - 500微安,个体化强度)或假刺激,在大约四周内进行20次疗程。在基线和随访时,参与者通过躯干电击进行急性应激诱导;测量指标包括生理指标(心率、心率变异性、呼吸频率、瞳孔直径)、生化指标(唾液α淀粉酶、皮质醇)、认知指标(空间定向、识别记忆、决策)和情感指标(状态 - 特质焦虑量表)。
应激诱导可靠地提高了交感 - 肾上腺髓质(SAM)和下丘脑 - 垂体 - 肾上腺(HPA)标志物以及主观焦虑水平。然而,几乎在所有结果中,主动CES与假刺激之间没有显著差异,也没有与疗程(基线与随访)的相互作用。在应激恢复、自我报告的焦虑或与应激相关的认知表现方面未观察到有意义的组间差异。
这些主要为阴性的结果对CES流行的作用机制解释提出了挑战,并表明在缓冲健康、神经正常个体的急性应激反应方面疗效有限。需要进一步的对照试验来探索替代参数、人群和神经生理终点,以更好地了解CES的治疗潜力。