Suppr超能文献

重复颅电刺激对急性应激的生理和行为反应的影响:一项双盲随机临床试验。

Effects of repeated cranial electrotherapy stimulation on physiological and behavioral responses to acute stress: a double-blind randomized clinical trial.

作者信息

Okano Kana, Lee Marissa Marko, Hart-Pomerantz Hannah, Smith Marisa, Sandone Madelyn K, Harvey Travis, Brunyé Tad T

机构信息

Center for Applied Brain and Cognitive Sciences, Tufts University, Medford, MA, United States.

Teamworks Innovations Inc., Durham, NC, United States.

出版信息

Front Hum Neurosci. 2025 Aug 13;19:1641801. doi: 10.3389/fnhum.2025.1641801. eCollection 2025.

Abstract

BACKGROUND

Cranial electrotherapy stimulation (CES) is a low-intensity, pulsed neuromodulation technique widely marketed for reducing stress and anxiety. Despite its popularity, empirical evidence for its efficacy remains mixed, with few studies employing rigorous controls, standardized protocols, and repeated CES exposures.

OBJECTIVE

To evaluate whether repeated CES sessions can attenuate physiological, biochemical, cognitive, and affective responses to an acute laboratory stressor.

METHODS

A double-blind, randomized, placebo-controlled clinical trial was conducted with 46 healthy participants (27 military personnel, 19 civilians). Participants were randomized to receive either active CES (250-500 μA at 0.5Hz, individualized intensity) or sham stimulation for 20 sessions over approximately four weeks. At baseline and follow-up visits, participants underwent acute stress induction using torso shock; measures included physiological (heart rate, heart rate variability, respiration rate, pupil diameter), biochemical (salivary alpha-amylase, cortisol), cognitive (spatial orientation, recognition memory, decision-making), and affective (State-Trait Anxiety Inventory) indices.

RESULTS

Stress induction reliably elevated sympathetic-adrenal medulla (SAM) and hypothalamic-pituitary-adrenal (HPA) markers as well as subjective anxiety. However, across nearly all outcomes, active CES did not differ significantly from sham, nor were there interactions with session (baseline vs. follow-up). No meaningful group differences were observed in stress recovery, self-reported anxiety, or stress-related cognitive performance.

CONCLUSIONS

These predominantly null findings challenge prevailing mechanistic accounts of CES and suggest limited efficacy in buffering acute stress responses in healthy, neurotypical individuals. Further controlled trials are needed to explore alternative parameters, populations, and neurophysiological endpoints to better understand CES's therapeutic potential.

CLINICAL TRIAL REGISTRATION

https://clinicaltrials.gov/, identifier NCT06034496.

摘要

背景

颅部电刺激疗法(CES)是一种低强度的脉冲神经调节技术,在市场上广泛用于减轻压力和焦虑。尽管其很受欢迎,但其疗效的实证证据仍参差不齐,很少有研究采用严格的对照、标准化方案以及重复的CES暴露。

目的

评估重复进行CES疗程是否能减轻对急性实验室应激源的生理、生化、认知和情感反应。

方法

对46名健康参与者(27名军人,19名平民)进行了一项双盲、随机、安慰剂对照临床试验。参与者被随机分配接受主动CES(0.5赫兹下250 - 500微安,个体化强度)或假刺激,在大约四周内进行20次疗程。在基线和随访时,参与者通过躯干电击进行急性应激诱导;测量指标包括生理指标(心率、心率变异性、呼吸频率、瞳孔直径)、生化指标(唾液α淀粉酶、皮质醇)、认知指标(空间定向、识别记忆、决策)和情感指标(状态 - 特质焦虑量表)。

结果

应激诱导可靠地提高了交感 - 肾上腺髓质(SAM)和下丘脑 - 垂体 - 肾上腺(HPA)标志物以及主观焦虑水平。然而,几乎在所有结果中,主动CES与假刺激之间没有显著差异,也没有与疗程(基线与随访)的相互作用。在应激恢复、自我报告的焦虑或与应激相关的认知表现方面未观察到有意义的组间差异。

结论

这些主要为阴性的结果对CES流行的作用机制解释提出了挑战,并表明在缓冲健康、神经正常个体的急性应激反应方面疗效有限。需要进一步的对照试验来探索替代参数、人群和神经生理终点,以更好地了解CES的治疗潜力。

临床试验注册

https://clinicaltrials.gov/,标识符NCT06034496。

https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/64af/12380913/f3717284dd35/fnhum-19-1641801-g001.jpg

相似文献

3
Non-invasive brain stimulation techniques for chronic pain.
Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2018 Mar 16;3(3):CD008208. doi: 10.1002/14651858.CD008208.pub4.
4
Non-invasive brain stimulation techniques for chronic pain.
Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2018 Apr 13;4(4):CD008208. doi: 10.1002/14651858.CD008208.pub5.
5
Electrotherapy modalities for rotator cuff disease.
Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2016 Jun 10;2016(6):CD012225. doi: 10.1002/14651858.CD012225.
6
Electrotherapy modalities for adhesive capsulitis (frozen shoulder).
Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2014 Oct 1;2014(10):CD011324. doi: 10.1002/14651858.CD011324.
8
Selegiline for Alzheimer's disease.
Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2003(1):CD000442. doi: 10.1002/14651858.CD000442.
9
Repetitive transcranial magnetic stimulation for post-traumatic stress disorder in adults.
Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2024 Aug 2;8(8):CD015040. doi: 10.1002/14651858.CD015040.pub2.
10
Ketamine and other glutamate receptor modulators for depression in bipolar disorder in adults.
Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2015 Sep 29(9):CD011611. doi: 10.1002/14651858.CD011611.pub2.

本文引用的文献

1
Identifying the most effective acute stress induction methods for producing SAM- and HPA-related physiological responses: a meta-analysis.
Anxiety Stress Coping. 2025 May;38(3):263-285. doi: 10.1080/10615806.2025.2450620. Epub 2025 Jan 9.
2
Towards optimized methodological parameters for maximizing the behavioral effects of transcranial direct current stimulation.
Front Hum Neurosci. 2024 Jul 2;18:1305446. doi: 10.3389/fnhum.2024.1305446. eCollection 2024.
3
Efficacy and Tolerability of Cranial Electrotherapy Stimulation in the Treatment of Anxiety: A Systemic Review and Meta-Analysis.
Front Psychiatry. 2022 Jun 9;13:899040. doi: 10.3389/fpsyt.2022.899040. eCollection 2022.
4
A Critical Review of Cranial Electrotherapy Stimulation for Neuromodulation in Clinical and Non-clinical Samples.
Front Hum Neurosci. 2021 Feb 1;15:625321. doi: 10.3389/fnhum.2021.625321. eCollection 2021.
5
A meta-analysis of cranial electrotherapy stimulation in the treatment of depression.
J Psychiatr Res. 2021 Mar;135:119-134. doi: 10.1016/j.jpsychires.2020.12.043. Epub 2020 Dec 21.
6
Transcranial electrical stimulation nomenclature.
Brain Stimul. 2019 Nov-Dec;12(6):1349-1366. doi: 10.1016/j.brs.2019.07.010. Epub 2019 Jul 17.
7
tACS motor system effects can be caused by transcutaneous stimulation of peripheral nerves.
Nat Commun. 2019 Jan 17;10(1):266. doi: 10.1038/s41467-018-08183-w.

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验