Diener Valeria, Zinelis Spiros, Eliades Theodore
Clinic of Orthodontics and Pediatric Dentistry, Center of Dental Medicine, University of Zurich, Zuirch, Switzerland.
Department of Biomaterials, University of Athens, Athens, Greece.
J Contemp Dent Pract. 2019 Jun 1;20(6):653-656.
To compare the mechanical properties of four different types of contemporary fissure sealants before and after water storage employing a modern instrumented indentation testing (IIT) method.
Four different types of materials used in everyday practice were deliberately selected. Fissurit (FIS) is a highly filled resin, Embrace (EMB) is a bisphenol A (BPA)-free unfilled resin, Helioseal (HEL) is an unfilled resin, and Riva Protect (RIV) is a glass-ionomer material. Six cylindrical specimens from each material were prepared (: 3 mm, : 15 mm), and Martens hardness (HM), elastic modulus (), elastic index (), and Vickers hardness (HV) were determined employing an IIT machine according to International Organization for Standardization (ISO) 14577:2015. Then, the samples were stored in water at 37°C for 48 hours and measured again at the same surface. The mechanical properties tested (HM, , , and HV) were statistically analyzed by two-way repeated measurements analysis of variance (ANOVA) employing materials and conditions as discriminating variables. Statistically significant differences were identified by Tukey's post hoc multiple comparison test. In all cases, a 95% level of significance was set ( = 0.05).
Statistically significant differences in selected mechanical properties were allocated among materials tested. The artificial aging had a detrimental effect on HM, , and HV apart from for FIS, EMB, and HEL. In contrast, no significant differences were identified for RIV before and after water storage for all aforementioned properties apart from .
Significant differences were identified in mechanical properties among materials tested and thus differences in their clinical behavior are anticipated.
This study contributes to the understanding of the mechanical properties of different dental sealants with respect to water contact, which may influence the choice by the therapist.
采用现代仪器化压痕测试(IIT)方法,比较四种不同类型的当代窝沟封闭剂在储水前后的机械性能。
特意选择了日常实践中使用的四种不同类型的材料。Fissurit(FIS)是一种高填充树脂,Embrace(EMB)是一种不含双酚A(BPA)的未填充树脂,Helioseal(HEL)是一种未填充树脂,而Riva Protect(RIV)是一种玻璃离子材料。每种材料制备六个圆柱形试样(直径:3毫米,高度:15毫米),并根据国际标准化组织(ISO)14577:2015,使用IIT机器测定马丁硬度(HM)、弹性模量( )、弹性指数( )和维氏硬度(HV)。然后,将样品在37°C的水中储存48小时,并在同一表面再次测量。采用双向重复测量方差分析(ANOVA),以材料和条件作为区分变量,对测试的机械性能(HM、 、 和HV)进行统计分析。通过Tukey事后多重比较检验确定统计学上的显著差异。在所有情况下,设定显著性水平为95%( = 0.05)。
在所测试的材料之间,选定的机械性能存在统计学上的显著差异。除了FIS、EMB和HEL的 之外,人工老化对HM、 和HV有不利影响。相比之下,对于RIV,除 之外,上述所有性能在储水前后均未发现显著差异。
在所测试的材料之间,机械性能存在显著差异,因此预计它们的临床行为也会有所不同。
本研究有助于了解不同牙科封闭剂在与水接触方面的机械性能,这可能会影响治疗师的选择。