Department of Prosthetic Dentistry, LMU München, Goethestrasse 70, 80336 Munich, Germany.
Department of Prosthetic Dentistry, LMU München, Goethestrasse 70, 80336 Munich, Germany.
J Mech Behav Biomed Mater. 2018 Oct;86:191-198. doi: 10.1016/j.jmbbm.2018.06.028. Epub 2018 Jun 25.
To determine the Martens hardness parameters for five different classes of CAD/CAM restorative materials after storage in water and thermo-cycling.
Lithium disilicate ceramic IPS e.max CAD (EX), silicate ceramic IPS Empress CAD (EC), a polymer infiltrated interpenetrating network material (hybrid material) VITA Enamic (VE), two compact filled composites Lava Ultimate (LU), experimental material (EM), two low filled resin composites Katana Avencia (KA), Ambarino High-Class (AH) and ultra-low/unfilled acrylic polymers CAD-Temp (CT), Telio CAD (TC), breCAM.HIPC (BC) were tested. Specimens were stored in water at 37 °C for 30, 60, 90, 120 days and afterwards thermo-cycled (30,000×, 5 °C/55 °C). Martens hardness (HM) and indentation modulus (E) were longitudinally investigated after each storage time. For structural analysis, each material was analyzed by scanning electron microscopy (SEM) and energy dispersive X-ray spectroscopy (EDX).
The groups of unfilled polymers/ultra-low filled composite (CT, TC, BC) followed by low (KA, AH) and compact filled resin composites (LU, EM) showed the lowest HM and E values (p < 0.001). The highest values presented ceramics (EX, EC) followed by hybrid material (VE) (p < 0.001). High influence on the Martens hardness parameters was exerted by the aging duration (HM: η = 0.108, p < 0.001; E: η = 0.074, p < 0.001). Structural analyses of resin composites revealed big differences in shape, size and distribution of filler particles.
The tested CAD/CAM materials showed differences in Martens hardness and indentation modulus pursuant to the material class. Ceramics showed highest values, followed by the hybrid material. For resin composites the Martens hardness and indentation modulus increased with the filler content. Artificial aging affected CAD/CAM materials differently. Some materials tested are prone to aging, the Martens hardness and indentation modulus decreased after thermo-cycling.
确定在水存储和热循环后,五类不同 CAD/CAM 修复材料的马氏体硬度参数。
测试了锂硅陶瓷 IPS e.max CAD(EX)、硅酸盐陶瓷 IPS Empress CAD(EC)、聚合物渗透互穿网络材料(混合材料)VITA Enamic(VE)、两种致密填充复合材料 Lava Ultimate(LU)、实验材料(EM)、两种低填充树脂复合材料 Katana Avencia(KA)、Ambarino High-Class(AH)和超低填充/无填充丙烯酸聚合物 CAD-Temp(CT)、Telio CAD(TC)、breCAM.HIPC(BC)。将试件在 37°C 的水中储存 30、60、90、120 天,然后进行热循环(30,000×,5°C/55°C)。在每次储存后,纵向研究马氏体硬度(HM)和压痕模量(E)。为了进行结构分析,使用扫描电子显微镜(SEM)和能量色散 X 射线光谱(EDX)对每种材料进行分析。
无填充聚合物/超低填充复合材料组(CT、TC、BC),其次是低填充树脂复合材料组(KA、AH)和致密填充树脂复合材料组(LU、EM),其马氏体硬度和压痕模量最低(p<0.001)。陶瓷(EX、EC)的数值最高,其次是混合材料(VE)(p<0.001)。老化时间对马氏体硬度参数的影响很大(HM:η=0.108,p<0.001;E:η=0.074,p<0.001)。树脂复合材料的结构分析显示出填料颗粒的形状、大小和分布有很大差异。
测试的 CAD/CAM 材料在马氏体硬度和压痕模量方面表现出不同的材料类别。陶瓷的数值最高,其次是混合材料。对于树脂复合材料,马氏体硬度和压痕模量随填料含量的增加而增加。人工老化对 CAD/CAM 材料的影响不同。一些测试材料容易老化,热循环后马氏体硬度和压痕模量降低。