• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

从临床试验疗效到实际生活有效性:为何传统指标行不通。

From Clinical Trial Efficacy to Real-Life Effectiveness: Why Conventional Metrics do not Work.

作者信息

Boissel Jean-Pierre, Cogny Frédéric, Marko Nicholas, Boissel François-Henri

机构信息

Novadiscovery, Lyon, France.

Department of Neurosurgery, MD Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, TX, USA.

出版信息

Drugs Real World Outcomes. 2019 Sep;6(3):125-132. doi: 10.1007/s40801-019-0159-z.

DOI:10.1007/s40801-019-0159-z
PMID:31359347
原文链接:https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC6702507/
Abstract

BACKGROUND

Randomised, double-blind, clinical trial methodology minimises bias in the measurement of treatment efficacy. However, most phase III trials in non-orphan diseases do not include individuals from the population to whom efficacy findings will be applied in the real world. Thus, a translation process must be used to infer effectiveness for these populations. Current conventional translation processes are not formalised and do not have a clear theoretical or practical base. There is a growing need for accurate translation, both for public health considerations and for supporting the shift towards personalised medicine.

OBJECTIVE

Our objective was to assess the results of translation of efficacy data to population efficacy from two simulated clinical trials for two drugs in three populations, using conventional methods.

METHODS

We simulated three populations, two drugs with different efficacies and two trials with different sampling protocols.

RESULTS

With few exceptions, current translation methods do not result in accurate population effectiveness predictions. The reason for this failure is the non-linearity of the translation method. One of the consequences of this inaccuracy is that pharmacoeconomic and postmarketing surveillance studies based on direct use of clinical trial efficacy metrics are flawed.

CONCLUSION

There is a clear need to develop and validate functional and relevant translation approaches for the translation of clinical trial efficacy to the real-world setting.

摘要

背景

随机双盲临床试验方法可最大程度减少治疗效果测量中的偏差。然而,大多数非罕见病的III期试验并未纳入那些在现实世界中将应用疗效研究结果的人群。因此,必须采用一种转化过程来推断这些人群的有效性。当前的传统转化过程未被形式化,也没有明确的理论或实践基础。出于公共卫生考虑以及支持向个性化医疗的转变,对准确转化的需求日益增长。

目的

我们的目的是使用传统方法评估在三种人群中针对两种药物的两项模拟临床试验将疗效数据转化为人群疗效的结果。

方法

我们模拟了三种人群、两种疗效不同的药物以及两项采用不同抽样方案的试验。

结果

除少数例外情况外,当前的转化方法无法得出准确的人群有效性预测结果。这种失败的原因在于转化方法的非线性。这种不准确性的后果之一是,基于直接使用临床试验疗效指标的药物经济学和上市后监测研究存在缺陷。

结论

显然需要开发并验证将临床试验疗效转化至现实环境的实用且相关的转化方法。

https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/6477/6702507/8613ac644e71/40801_2019_159_Fig2_HTML.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/6477/6702507/4f0a993dbc18/40801_2019_159_Fig1_HTML.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/6477/6702507/8613ac644e71/40801_2019_159_Fig2_HTML.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/6477/6702507/4f0a993dbc18/40801_2019_159_Fig1_HTML.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/6477/6702507/8613ac644e71/40801_2019_159_Fig2_HTML.jpg

相似文献

1
From Clinical Trial Efficacy to Real-Life Effectiveness: Why Conventional Metrics do not Work.从临床试验疗效到实际生活有效性:为何传统指标行不通。
Drugs Real World Outcomes. 2019 Sep;6(3):125-132. doi: 10.1007/s40801-019-0159-z.
2
The Effectiveness of Integrated Care Pathways for Adults and Children in Health Care Settings: A Systematic Review.综合护理路径在医疗环境中对成人和儿童的有效性:一项系统评价。
JBI Libr Syst Rev. 2009;7(3):80-129. doi: 10.11124/01938924-200907030-00001.
3
Review of methodological issues of clinical trials in multiple sclerosis.多发性硬化症临床试验的方法学问题综述
J Neurol Sci. 2011 Dec;311 Suppl 1:S35-42. doi: 10.1016/S0022-510X(11)70007-7.
4
A rapid and systematic review of the clinical effectiveness and cost-effectiveness of topotecan for ovarian cancer.拓扑替康治疗卵巢癌的临床有效性和成本效益的快速系统评价。
Health Technol Assess. 2001;5(28):1-110. doi: 10.3310/hta5280.
5
6
How to anticipate the assessment of the public health benefit of new medicines?如何预测对新药公共卫生效益的评估?
Therapie. 2007 Sep-Oct;62(5):427-35. doi: 10.2515/therapie:2007071. Epub 2008 Jan 19.
7
8
Right care, first time: a highly personalised and measurement-based care model to manage youth mental health.精准医疗,首次就诊:高度个性化和基于评估的青少年心理健康管理医疗模式。
Med J Aust. 2019 Nov;211 Suppl 9:S3-S46. doi: 10.5694/mja2.50383.
9
Repaglinide : a pharmacoeconomic review of its use in type 2 diabetes mellitus.瑞格列奈:对其在2型糖尿病治疗中应用的药物经济学综述
Pharmacoeconomics. 2004;22(6):389-411. doi: 10.2165/00019053-200422060-00005.
10
Opioids and the management of chronic severe pain in the elderly: consensus statement of an International Expert Panel with focus on the six clinically most often used World Health Organization Step III opioids (buprenorphine, fentanyl, hydromorphone, methadone, morphine, oxycodone).阿片类药物与老年人慢性重度疼痛的管理:一个国际专家小组的共识声明,重点关注世界卫生组织第三阶梯临床最常用的六种阿片类药物(丁丙诺啡、芬太尼、氢吗啡酮、美沙酮、吗啡、羟考酮)。
Pain Pract. 2008 Jul-Aug;8(4):287-313. doi: 10.1111/j.1533-2500.2008.00204.x. Epub 2008 May 23.

引用本文的文献

1
Primary Technology-Enhanced Care for Hypertension Scaling Program: Trial-Based Economic Evaluation Examining Effectiveness and Cost-Effectiveness Using Real-World Data in Singapore.高血压初级技术强化护理扩展项目:在新加坡使用真实世界数据进行基于试验的经济评估,考察有效性和成本效益。
J Med Internet Res. 2025 Apr 15;27:e59275. doi: 10.2196/59275.
2
Real-life effectiveness of FLOT in resectable gastric cancer: existing challenges.氟尿嘧啶、亚叶酸钙、奥沙利铂和多西他赛(FLOT)方案在可切除胃癌中的实际疗效:现存挑战
Drugs Context. 2025 Feb 18;14. doi: 10.7573/dic.2024-10-7. eCollection 2025.
3
Clinical Guidance on the Monitoring and Management of Trastuzumab Deruxtecan (T-DXd)-Related Adverse Events: Insights from an Asia-Pacific Multidisciplinary Panel.

本文引用的文献

1
Inclusion and Exclusion Criteria of Clinical Trials for Insomnia.失眠临床试验的纳入和排除标准。
J Clin Med. 2018 Aug 8;7(8):206. doi: 10.3390/jcm7080206.
2
Pragmatic Trials.实用性试验
N Engl J Med. 2016 Aug 4;375(5):454-63. doi: 10.1056/NEJMra1510059.
3
Effect model law: an approach for the implementation of personalized medicine.效应模型定律:实施个性化医疗的一种方法。
曲妥珠单抗-德鲁替康(T-DXd)相关不良事件监测与管理的临床指导:来自亚太多学科专家组的见解。
Drug Saf. 2023 Oct;46(10):927-949. doi: 10.1007/s40264-023-01328-x. Epub 2023 Aug 8.
4
Modeling the disruption of respiratory disease clinical trials by non-pharmaceutical COVID-19 interventions.模拟非药物 COVID-19 干预措施对呼吸道疾病临床试验的干扰。
Nat Commun. 2022 Apr 13;13(1):1980. doi: 10.1038/s41467-022-29534-8.
5
Solving the Evidence Interpretability Crisis in Health Technology Assessment: A Role for Mechanistic Models?解决卫生技术评估中的证据可解释性危机:机制模型能发挥作用吗?
Front Med Technol. 2022 Feb 24;4:810315. doi: 10.3389/fmedt.2022.810315. eCollection 2022.
6
Using numerical modeling and simulation to assess the ethical burden in clinical trials and how it relates to the proportion of responders in a trial sample.使用数值建模和模拟来评估临床试验中的伦理负担,以及其与试验样本中应答者比例的关系。
PLoS One. 2021 Oct 11;16(10):e0258093. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0258093. eCollection 2021.
J Pers Med. 2013 Aug 15;3(3):177-90. doi: 10.3390/jpm3030177.
4
Comparison of an effect-model-law-based method versus traditional clinical practice guidelines for optimal treatment decision-making: application to statin treatment in the French population.基于效应模型法则的方法与传统临床实践指南在优化治疗决策方面的比较:在法国人群他汀类药物治疗中的应用
J R Soc Interface. 2014 Nov 6;11(100):20140867. doi: 10.1098/rsif.2014.0867.
5
Generalizing evidence from randomized clinical trials to target populations: The ACTG 320 trial.将随机临床试验证据推广到目标人群:ACTG 320 试验。
Am J Epidemiol. 2010 Jul 1;172(1):107-15. doi: 10.1093/aje/kwq084. Epub 2010 Jun 14.
6
Randomized clinical trials and observational studies: guidelines for assessing respective strengths and limitations.随机临床试验与观察性研究:评估各自优势与局限性的指南
JACC Cardiovasc Interv. 2008 Jun;1(3):211-7. doi: 10.1016/j.jcin.2008.01.008.
7
Revisiting the relationship between baseline risk and risk under treatment.重新审视基线风险与治疗中风险之间的关系。
Emerg Themes Epidemiol. 2009 Feb 17;6:1. doi: 10.1186/1742-7622-6-1.
8
Exaggeration of treatment benefits using the "event-based" number needed to treat.使用“基于事件”的治疗所需人数来夸大治疗益处。
CMAJ. 2008 Sep 23;179(7):669-71. doi: 10.1503/cmaj.080018.
9
Remifentanil for general anaesthesia: a systematic review.瑞芬太尼用于全身麻醉:一项系统评价
Anaesthesia. 2007 Dec;62(12):1266-80. doi: 10.1111/j.1365-2044.2007.05221.x.
10
Limitations of applying summary results of clinical trials to individual patients: the need for risk stratification.将临床试验的总结结果应用于个体患者的局限性:风险分层的必要性。
JAMA. 2007 Sep 12;298(10):1209-12. doi: 10.1001/jama.298.10.1209.