• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

炎症性肠病中美沙拉嗪-别嘌醇联合治疗的安全性真实世界研究:骨髓毒性和肝毒性很少影响维持治疗。

Real-life study of safety of thiopurine-allopurinol combination therapy in inflammatory bowel disease: myelotoxicity and hepatotoxicity rarely affect maintenance treatment.

机构信息

Department of Gastroenterology and Hepatology, Erasmus MC University Medical Center, Rotterdam, The Netherlands.

Department of Gastroenterology and Hepatology, Amsterdam UMC, Vrije Universiteit Amsterdam, AG&M Research Institute, Amsterdam, The Netherlands.

出版信息

Aliment Pharmacol Ther. 2019 Aug;50(4):407-415. doi: 10.1111/apt.15402.

DOI:10.1111/apt.15402
PMID:31359480
Abstract

BACKGROUND

Low-dose thiopurine-allopurinol (LDTA) combination therapy is a commonly applied optimisation strategy in IBD patients with a skewed thiopurine metabolism.

AIM

To assess continued LDTA maintenance treatment at annual intervals and explore risk factors for treatment cessation METHODS: Adult IBD patients treated with LDTA between 2009 and 2016 were retrospectively included. Data on the incidence of clinical and laboratory adverse events (AEs), including hepatotoxicity and myelotoxicity resulting in imposing LDTA therapy cessation and associated risk factors were collected.

RESULTS

In total, 221 IBD patients (46% male, median age 42 years) were included. Maintenance LDTA treatment was continued in 78% of patients at 1 year (n = 145), 66% at 2 years (n = 83), 57% at 3 years (n = 52) and 52% at 4 years (n = 33). Treatment in patients receiving LDTA therapy for AEs during thiopurine monotherapy was more often continued than in patients initiating LDTA for other indications (eg, ineffectiveness of thiopurine monotherapy, routinely discovered skewed metabolism) (P = 0.016). Myelotoxicity during thiopurine monotherapy resolved in 87% and hepatotoxicity in 86% after median of 1.2 and 1.4 months after LDTA initiation. Cumulative incidence of AEs during LDTA resulting in therapy cessation within total follow-up of 449 treatment-years was 7% for clinical AEs, 4% for myelotoxicity and 1% for hepatotoxicity.

CONCLUSION

LDTA therapy is a safe and beneficial optimisation strategy in IBD patients. Continued maintenance LDTA treatment is 52% after 4 years of treatment and most commonly affected by ineffectiveness of LDTA rather than LDTA-attributed toxicity. LDTA optimisation strategy is most advantageous in patients failing thiopurine monotherapy due to AEs.

摘要

背景

低剂量巯嘌呤-别嘌呤醇(LDTA)联合治疗是一种常用于巯嘌呤代谢异常的 IBD 患者的优化策略。

目的

评估每年一次的 LDTA 维持治疗,并探讨治疗终止的危险因素。

方法

回顾性纳入 2009 年至 2016 年接受 LDTA 治疗的成年 IBD 患者。收集包括肝毒性和骨髓毒性导致 LDTA 治疗终止在内的临床和实验室不良事件(AE)的发生率,以及相关的危险因素。

结果

共纳入 221 例 IBD 患者(46%为男性,中位年龄 42 岁)。1 年时(n=145)78%的患者继续维持 LDTA 治疗,2 年时(n=83)66%,3 年时(n=52)57%,4 年时(n=33)52%。在因 AE 接受 LDTA 治疗的患者中,继续治疗的比例高于因其他原因(如巯嘌呤单药治疗无效、常规发现代谢异常)开始 LDTA 治疗的患者(P=0.016)。巯嘌呤单药治疗期间发生的骨髓毒性在 LDTA 治疗开始后中位数 1.2 个月和 1.4 个月分别有 87%和 86%得到缓解。在 449 个治疗年的总随访期间,LDTA 相关 AE 导致治疗终止的累积发生率为临床 AE 7%,骨髓毒性 4%,肝毒性 1%。

结论

LDTA 治疗是 IBD 患者安全有效的优化策略。在 4 年的治疗后,继续维持 LDTA 治疗的比例为 52%,最常见的原因是 LDTA 治疗无效,而不是 LDTA 相关毒性。在因 AE 而导致巯嘌呤单药治疗失败的患者中,LDTA 优化策略最具优势。

相似文献

1
Real-life study of safety of thiopurine-allopurinol combination therapy in inflammatory bowel disease: myelotoxicity and hepatotoxicity rarely affect maintenance treatment.炎症性肠病中美沙拉嗪-别嘌醇联合治疗的安全性真实世界研究:骨髓毒性和肝毒性很少影响维持治疗。
Aliment Pharmacol Ther. 2019 Aug;50(4):407-415. doi: 10.1111/apt.15402.
2
Limited added value of laboratory monitoring in thiopurine maintenance monotherapy in inflammatory bowel disease patients.在炎症性肠病患者中,硫唑嘌呤维持单药治疗时,实验室监测的附加价值有限。
Aliment Pharmacol Ther. 2020 Jun;51(12):1353-1364. doi: 10.1111/apt.15734. Epub 2020 Apr 28.
3
Long-term outcome of using allopurinol co-therapy as a strategy for overcoming thiopurine hepatotoxicity in treating inflammatory bowel disease.使用别嘌呤醇联合治疗作为克服硫唑嘌呤肝毒性以治疗炎症性肠病的策略的长期结果。
Aliment Pharmacol Ther. 2008 Sep 15;28(6):734-41. doi: 10.1111/j.1365-2036.2008.03782.x.
4
Thiopurine hepatotoxicity in inflammatory bowel disease: the role for adding allopurinol.硫嘌呤在炎症性肠病中的肝毒性:加用别嘌醇的作用。
Expert Opin Drug Saf. 2008 Sep;7(5):607-16. doi: 10.1517/14740338.7.5.607.
5
Low-dose thiopurine with allopurinol co-therapy overcomes thiopurine intolerance and allows thiopurine continuation in inflammatory bowel disease.低剂量巯嘌呤联合别嘌醇共同治疗可克服巯嘌呤不耐受,使炎症性肠病患者能继续使用巯嘌呤。
Dig Liver Dis. 2018 Jul;50(7):682-688. doi: 10.1016/j.dld.2018.02.001. Epub 2018 Feb 10.
6
Optimizing Thiopurine Therapy in Inflammatory Bowel Disease Among 2 Real-life Intercept Cohorts: Effect of Allopurinol Comedication?优化 2 个真实队列中炎症性肠病的硫唑嘌呤治疗:别嘌醇合并用药的影响?
Inflamm Bowel Dis. 2017 Nov;23(11):2011-2017. doi: 10.1097/MIB.0000000000001168.
7
Nodular Regenerative Hyperplasia of the Liver in Patients with IBD Treated with Allopurinol-Thiopurine Combination Therapy.接受别嘌醇-硫嘌呤联合治疗的炎症性肠病患者的肝脏结节性再生性增生
Inflamm Bowel Dis. 2017 Mar;23(3):448-452. doi: 10.1097/MIB.0000000000001036.
8
Feasibility of Reduced Clinical Monitoring in Patients with Inflammatory Bowel Disease Treated with Thiopurine Therapy.硫嘌呤治疗炎症性肠病患者减少临床监测的可行性。
Dig Dis Sci. 2023 Jul;68(7):2936-2945. doi: 10.1007/s10620-023-07950-0. Epub 2023 May 2.
9
Influence of allopurinol on thiopurine associated toxicity: A retrospective population-based cohort study.别嘌醇对硫唑嘌呤相关毒性的影响:一项基于人群的回顾性队列研究。
Br J Clin Pharmacol. 2021 May;87(5):2333-2340. doi: 10.1111/bcp.14625. Epub 2020 Nov 20.
10
A comparative analysis of tioguanine versus low-dose thiopurines combined with allopurinol in inflammatory bowel disease patients.硫鸟嘌呤与小剂量巯嘌呤联合别嘌醇治疗炎症性肠病的对比分析。
Aliment Pharmacol Ther. 2020 Jun;51(11):1076-1086. doi: 10.1111/apt.15730. Epub 2020 Apr 27.

引用本文的文献

1
The Effectiveness and Safety of First-Line Thioguanine in Thiopurine-Naïve Inflammatory Bowel Disease Patients.一线硫鸟嘌呤在硫嘌呤初治炎症性肠病患者中的疗效和安全性。
Inflamm Bowel Dis. 2024 Sep 3;30(9):1492-1499. doi: 10.1093/ibd/izad197.
2
Liver involvement in inflammatory bowel disease: What should the clinician know?炎症性肠病中的肝脏受累:临床医生应该了解什么?
World J Hepatol. 2021 Nov 27;13(11):1534-1551. doi: 10.4254/wjh.v13.i11.1534.
3
Azathioprine with Allopurinol Is a Promising First-Line Therapy for Inflammatory Bowel Diseases.
硫唑嘌呤联合别嘌醇治疗炎症性肠病有较好的前景。
Dig Dis Sci. 2022 Aug;67(8):4008-4019. doi: 10.1007/s10620-021-07273-y. Epub 2021 Nov 2.
4
Clinical effects of ursodeoxycholic acid on patients with ulcerative colitis may improve via the regulation of IL-23-IL-17 axis and the changes of the proportion of intestinal microflora.熊去氧胆酸对溃疡性结肠炎患者的临床疗效可能通过调节 IL-23-IL-17 轴和肠道菌群比例的变化来改善。
Saudi J Gastroenterol. 2021 May-Jun;27(3):149-157. doi: 10.4103/sjg.SJG_462_20.
5
Thalidomide Combined With Azathioprine as Induction and Maintenance Therapy for Azathioprine-Refractory Crohn's Disease Patients.沙利度胺联合硫唑嘌呤用于硫唑嘌呤难治性克罗恩病患者的诱导和维持治疗
Front Med (Lausanne). 2020 Nov 6;7:557986. doi: 10.3389/fmed.2020.557986. eCollection 2020.
6
A comparative analysis of tioguanine versus low-dose thiopurines combined with allopurinol in inflammatory bowel disease patients.硫鸟嘌呤与小剂量巯嘌呤联合别嘌醇治疗炎症性肠病的对比分析。
Aliment Pharmacol Ther. 2020 Jun;51(11):1076-1086. doi: 10.1111/apt.15730. Epub 2020 Apr 27.
7
Can We Predict the Toxicity and Response to Thiopurines in Inflammatory Bowel Diseases?我们能否预测炎症性肠病患者对硫嘌呤类药物的毒性反应和疗效?
Front Med (Lausanne). 2019 Nov 28;6:279. doi: 10.3389/fmed.2019.00279. eCollection 2019.