Aubert Bonn Noémie, Pinxten Wim
1 Hasselt University, Belgium.
J Empir Res Hum Res Ethics. 2019 Oct;14(4):338-352. doi: 10.1177/1556264619858534. Epub 2019 Jul 30.
Research on research integrity has become a field of its own; yet, a comprehensive overview the field is still missing. We systematically searched SCOPUS, Web of Science, and PubMed for relevant articles published between 2005 and 2015. We extracted the topic, methodology, focus, and citations from each articles. From the 986 articles included, only 342 report empirical data. Empirical papers predominantly targeted researchers and students. Although empirical articles questioning causes for misconduct mostly blamed research systems (e.g., pressure, competition) for detrimental research practices, articles proposing approaches to foster integrity focused on researchers' awareness and compliance rather than on system changes. Involving nonresearchers and reconnecting what is known to what is proposed may help research on research integrity move forward.
关于研究诚信的研究已自成一个领域；然而，该领域仍缺乏全面概述。我们系统检索了Scopus、科学网和PubMed，以查找2005年至2015年间发表的相关文章。我们从每篇文章中提取了主题、方法、重点和引用情况。在纳入的986篇文章中，只有342篇报告了实证数据。实证论文主要针对研究人员和学生。尽管质疑不当行为成因的实证文章大多将有害的研究行为归咎于研究体系（如压力、竞争），但提出促进诚信方法的文章则侧重于研究人员的意识和合规性，而非体系变革。让非研究人员参与进来，并将已知内容与所提出的内容重新联系起来，可能有助于推动关于研究诚信的研究向前发展。
