Percutaneous endoscopic debridement and drainage for the treatment of instrumented lumbar spine infection.

PURPOSE

The purpose of this study is to evaluate the efficacy of percutaneous endoscopic debridement and drainage (PEDD) in patients with surgical site infection (SSI) following instrumented lumbar fusion.

METHODS

We retrospectively reviewed the medical records of 20 patients (6 women and 14 men; average age, 60.1 years) who underwent PEDD at our institute to treat SSI following instrumented lumbar fusion from January 2010 to December 2015. The terminal event, or failure of PEDD treatment, was defined as a shift in treatment methods to open surgery. Risk factors were analyzed to determine their effect on the therapeutic results of PEDD. Clinical outcomes were assessed by careful physical examination, regular serologic testing, and imaging studies to determine whether continued conservative treatment or open surgery was necessary.

RESULTS

Causative bacteria was identified in 17 (85%) of the 20 biopsy specimens. Successful infection control through PEDD was identified in 13 patients (65%). Both the visual analog scale and Oswestry disability index significantly improved in these patients. Detection of the causative pathogens was the only risk factor influencing the terminal event in the remaining seven patients (35%).

CONCLUSION

In this study, PEDD was an effective treatment approach for obtaining a bacteriological diagnosis, relieving the patient's symptoms, and assisting in eradication of SSI following instrumented lumbar fusion. The use of species-specific antibiotics for the offending pathogens appears to be the most important factor to determine the success rate. The indications of this procedure could be extended to treat patients with SSI after instrumented lumbar fusion.